To be honest what's frustrating is all these XVI concerns (which are fair!) mainly come from people that haven't played Heavensward and who don't seem particularly driven to. And that's fine, I get that's a big investment. But we're not all in the dark here as far as the type of things this team would/wouldn't do with their fiction and their characters. We're not talking about Nomura and Nojima and nothing they've done - be it this year or ten years ago - actually has any bearing on what XVI is doing in all likelihood.
This feels disingenuous. There's been female XIV players on here that have critiqued the way women in XIV are written and broke down why have their own issues people on this very page aren't touching on but just do it in safe spaces like the why women critique sexualized designs thread - and considering some of these replies it's not hard to see why anymore. I've personally played about 95% of HW so indirectly implying I have no knowledge of what I'm talking about it and should shut up is weird. I don't find anything wowing or that progressive about how women are written in it from what I've played.
Maybe you thought his answer to the question was awful, but that article was a WOC reporter going out of her way to ask a question the community cares deeply about. I would think you would commend that.
Y'shtola bas been a black mage for years now, too. That's what I'm talking about. Like I said above, the skepticism you lay out is fair regardless, but we're not actually so in the dark on a lot of these things. There's an interesting female character involved in nearly every hour of FFXIVs narrative. I know this is a little "bingo card", but I'm saying: There's a good-faith reason it keeps coming up.
What does the writer being a WoC have to do with him giving her an awful answer to her question and basically trivializing the matter? 1). I know Natalie is brown and 2). if this is supposed to be some type of gotcha it just emphasizes how shitty the situation because where brown people's representation is easily handwaved away through excuses. I also know Y'shtola is a black mage (hence why I said she '
was' a white mage) which only just happened an expansion ago so again, it's weird for you to repeatedly indirectly imply that I'm entirely ignorant in what's going on within XIV just because I haven't fully played all the expansions. She's ultimately still a mage,
the role most main leading women are placed into...just like I said in my earlier post.
but we're not actually so in the dark on a lot of these things.
I've tried to be nice and respectful but the framing of this is so
fucking shitty lmao.
Nobody would argue against your skepticism, but you first based it on XV alone, and when given better examples by other members (who you assume are all men) you seem to dismiss them. XIV has a female monk as one of its main characters (also THE main character of one expansion), you can be a female Warrior of light, Alisaie fights with a sword (not only magic), and they just included male Viera and female Hrothgar options. Even if they make mistakes, at least they seem to be trying to improve in this aspect.
No, I don't assume. I check people's profile/what they identify as every time I see one of these types of posts and like literally 99% time of the case it's men citing reasons why people shouldn't be concerned. Which is what you're doing right now lmao.
Amazing. Besides, my skepticism goes back to various games with or without Nomura and Nojima - I've literally written essay on here on why Ashe's writing in XII is flawed as a female character. XII ain't a Nomura or Nojima game. Also I'm not going to praise Lyse, who is basically the equivalent of a white savior and just another reminder of XIV's issues with colorism - something that I've also written about on here. The problem isn't even about just having a female party member which I've literally explained in this thread and is a point that keeps getting missed.
But I guess I'm a dumb girl who doesn't know what I'm talking about and am totally in the dark lmao.