I was assuming their would be more fleshed out, narrative filler. I just didnt want "side quest" filler. In my experience side quests in jrpgs have never been good unless we're talking Yakuza.
The funny part is, the "ideas" behind the "new" story twists in FF7R are used to some degrees with Shadowbringers that I won't spoil, but are handled more evenly and more maturely imo.
Reviewers mentioned it, quite a few actually, and unless we outright spoiled it are you also going to attack every reviewer who mentioned it?
Many bugs influencing the experience of the game =/= insanely polished.
Awesome. Those were the most memorable parts of that game to me so I approve.
This is largely true. Still a shame japan hasn't taken just a little bit from witcher in that department but in the end I don't think sidequests matter all too much.
You're the first person I've seen complain about putting scores on the title. I never personally saw an issue with posting review aggregator scores on my thread titles and I've done this before on several review threads I've made.
Both is my impression from what I read. The one thing people have been saying though is the rewards are generally worth it though.
Did you end up playing the game? You were very skeptical before but it kinda sounds like you've turned around?
The majority of people didn't experience bugs though. That's the thing. People weren't turning a blind eye to rare cases.
lol @ anyone calling the game divisive based on these reviews. reminder:
2019 paid dust
Oh I was going to play it regardless.
Why don't you just do this in your head? If you want to view the game as an 89, 93, 97, or 100 or whatever, just hold that opinion yourself instead of trying to concoct some ass-backwards scoring schemes that give you the confirmation bias you're seeking.
