It seems to me that this fellow did so for that reason and some lackluster side quests:86. I'm gonna bet most feel it's a high 80s/maybe 90 level game, but some reviews will ding it for being a Part 1, and some for being a remake of FFVII.
It seems to me that this fellow did so for that reason and some lackluster side quests:86. I'm gonna bet most feel it's a high 80s/maybe 90 level game, but some reviews will ding it for being a Part 1, and some for being a remake of FFVII.
Whoa. This game was delayed and yet these exist in the final product. Makes me wonder if they will patch this soon. Seems like a texture missing or something. Guessing no matter how long your character stood there it didn't load in at all? Was wondering if I/O related.
Are these peeps on mc?Análisis de Final Fantasy VII Remake para PS4
Final Fantasy VII Remake se convierte por méritos propios en una obra maestra digna de recuerdoareajugones.sport.es
Areajugones 10/10
no thanks I'll use the word that describes what it is.. no /s at all..... the textures in that picture are fucking lazy and more over embarrassing.yup proof these devs are just lazy.
/s
Stop using that word when it comes to game development please.
Entitled gamer knows all about game developmentno thanks I'll use the word that describes what it is.. no /s at all..... the textures in that picture are fucking lazy and more over embarrassing.
Yes they are.Are these peeps on mc?
edit: oh they are
Areajugones Profile - Metacritic
Read what Areajugones had to say at Metacritic.comwww.metacritic.com
Considering how many people and hours go into making a product of this size, lazy is definitely not a good word to use.
It seems to me that this fellow did so for that reason and some lackluster side quests:
I don't think these issues are getting patched out. It's so frequent and widespread that I doubt it's a bug or optimisation issue. I think it's a limitation of the engine and visual style they went for - hyper detailed character models.
The game still looks beautiful, but this issue is going to get called out in reviews.
It was already stated a long time ago that it was going to be episodic, and some people are giving bad scores because it isn't a full game? Ok then...
First 15 seconds already tell me his review is entirely based on the original game and not the new one lol
I haven't watched the video but the project is selling on nostalgia, so it's just a fallacy if people try to dismiss some reviews that compare it unfavourably to the original. The game is likely going to score well and sell very well, so no there's no need for damage control.First 15 seconds already tell me his review is entirely based on the original game and not the new one lol
It has on the back of the box, at the bottom in smaller writing that it's just the first part. I think this problem is partly on SE.It was already stated a long time ago that it was going to be episodic, and some people are giving bad scores because it isn't a full game? Ok then...
Completely agree, you can try and not compare it to the original but they shouldn't be any shaming people that do. And it's bullshit when you're allowed to say "Honours the original" but not the other way round.People are really trying to damage control an 8.5 by questioning the integrity of the reviewer. Ok, it's officially FF7R review day. If some of y'all take issue with a reviewer scoring this game with the expectations that come purchasing and playing something called "Final Fantasy 7 Remake", then you are in for a long day as the rest of the reviews arrive. This game's main export is nostalgia. It's impossible to review this project as a stand-alone consumer good without viewing it comparatively to the source material.
Agreed. And people are trying to negate that score quickly. Imagine if a rogue 7 or 6 hits the aggregate scores.
Hi, I speak for all developers when I say please shut your mouth. You don't know what you're talking about and it's making you look very, very ignorant.no thanks I'll use the word that describes what it is.. no /s at all..... the textures in that picture are fucking lazy and more over embarrassing.
First 15 seconds already tell me his review is entirely based on the original game and not the new one lol
That is 100% going to happen. Always does no matter the game.Agreed. And people are trying to negate that score quickly. Imagine if a rogue 7 or 6 hits the aggregate scores.
Bad sidequests are exactly what I'd ding it for tho? Haven't watched the review, but I expect plenty of reviews to harp on sidequests.
They aren't. So much of this game is fantastically realized and beautiful. It's tragic the standards that they're held to, that somebody is going to point out a soap dispenser or whatever and say not enough polygons, lazy devs.
Agreed. And people are trying to negate that score quickly. Imagine if a rogue 7 or 6 hits the aggregate scores.
8.5 is a very fair score from what I've played but people are going to have meltdowns before even playing it if that's what the MC aggregate ends up being
It happens all the time in forums, always fallacies in review discussion, like in Death Stranding thread "it's because this reviewer can't handle something different", also remember "It's getting good reviews just because of Kojima's name" I haven't played it but I recognise that BS when I see it.Agreed. And people are trying to negate that score quickly. Imagine if a rogue 7 or 6 hits the aggregate scores.
Not sure if you are joking? I get waiting for reviews but putting that much stock in a MC score might work against you.
When I was a kid, I used to be like "Twilight Princess is going to be greatest game ever" Now I think if it's enjoyable for me, that's enough.
Right? An enormous portion of what makes this project so intriguing is seeing how they take the 1997 mega-classic and bring it into 2020 with modern tech. When Cloud and Co. arrive on screen in a trailer, the overwhelming majority reaction is "wow they nailed the look" and not "huh, so what's this Final Fantasy 7 game ... this spiky-haired guy looks neat, I'm sold!"It happens all the time in forums, always fallacies in review discussion, like in Death Stranding thread "it's because this reviewer can't handle something different", also remember "It's getting good reviews just because of Kojima's name" I haven't played it but I recognise that BS when I see it.
With FF VII, the excuse we're going to hear a lot is "Don't compare it to the original blah blah" well tough shit, the game is meant to make money off people's familiarity of the original, they can compare it all they want.
im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.Hi, I speak for all developers when I say please shut your mouth. You don't know what you're talking about and it's making you look very, very ignorant.
im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..
Well that was needlessly rude towards a developer.im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..
im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..
im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..
Your responses are incredibly ignorant and arrogant, and I'm surprised we let comments like this even exist on here because it's only meant to be inflammatory.im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..
im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..
im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..
people are going to get death threats when that happens.Agreed. And people are trying to negate that score quickly. Imagine if a rogue 7 or 6 hits the aggregate scores.
At risk of being warned/banned, you're an idiot who has no idea what they're talking about.im good... I'll post what i want! Just because you've worked on a few indie games doesn't mean you speak for "every developer" I see an insanely lazily low effort texture/polygonal object that has no business being that low res. I'm calling it what is.. which is lazy. They shouldn't have even put anything their at all if that's what they're gonna do.
They must have been busy though.... with other things like making this ps2 level foreground here..