The same ones that have already been calculated by the government up to that point. The system is pure corruption to allow the tax software/service industry to exist. See video I posted on previous page. The only tax service industry that should persist is for complicated corporate taxes.That's even weirder then, so what taxes do you need to fill in at the end of the financial year?
Why can't the IRS just do taxes for people? They have all the info already.
I like how much effort they put in trying to hid their free filing options.The same ones that have already been calculated by the government up to that point. The system is pure corruption to allow the tax software/service industry to exist. See video I posted on previous page. The only tax service industry that should persist is for complicated corporate taxes.
How the hell does H&R Block and TurboTax have more say in Congress than normal people do?
Your employer will only be withholding what you tell them to via a worksheet. Many people don't have the correct information on file, or they intentionally make it inaccurate so that they get a refund.That's even weirder then, so what taxes do you need to fill in at the end of the financial year?
Lol are you unfamiliar with how the US works?How the hell does H&R Block and TurboTax have more say in Congress than normal people do?
I mean, you don't go to jail unless you intentionally tried to not pay or underpay your taxes.
I've underpaid the IRS twice by accident/bad math and all they did was send me a notice showing me the error and saying, "Pay this much more." It's typically not a big deal.
I'm venting frustrations. A job that could be done by the government is being left in the hands of a private company bent on milking as much profit as possible.
I'm venting frustrations. A job that could be done by the government is being left in the hands of a private company bent on milking as much profit as possible.
Have you job send an official .pdf of W-2 form, with turbo tax I simply upload the official .pdf and and just answer questions my taxes takes 10mins..
The original W4 wasn't good for household with multiple streams of income. Doubt many people bothered filling out the extra worksheet either.Yeah it always bothered me how you can answer the questions on a W-4 honestly and end up owing money. When I got married my spouse (who worked at HR Block for years) was like "no you aren't supposed to answer the questions correctly, answer like this and you will always get money back" and I just stood there with a confused expression on my face.
Instead of questions about dependents, etc. why can't it be questions like "do you want more money now (that you will have to give back), do you want less money now (and we will give you more later), or do you want something in the middle" etc.
What I mean is our W-4s have always said that we are single and have no dependents and that hasn't been true in over 15 years (and also conflicts with how we file annually). And there is nobody going around behind us making sure that those fields are accurate, they just factor into the amount that gets taken out of your paycheck. Since the questions don't have to have real answers, to me it seems silly/meaningless (or deceptive in a way) and I would rather the questions be asked a different way.The original W4 wasn't good for household with multiple streams of income. Doubt many people bothered filling out the extra worksheet either.
They have to ask about dependents though because that can make a huge impact on your tax liability.
I'm curious, how do other countries collect income tax? I assume their systems aren't insanely nuts like the US's?
I'm curious, how do other countries collect income tax? I assume their systems aren't insanely nuts like the US's?
Well... How was payroll supposed to know that your circumstances had changed? Even in a more competent country, that information needs to be relayed to your employer.What I mean is our W-4s have always said that we are single and have no dependents and that hasn't been true in over 15 years (and also conflicts with how we file annually). And there is nobody going around behind us making sure that those fields are accurate, they just factor into the amount that gets taken out of your paycheck. Since the questions don't have to have real answers, to me it seems silly/meaningless (or deceptive in a way) and I would rather the questions be asked a different way.
Why does payroll need to know if I'm married or not or how many kids I have?Well... How was payroll supposed to know that your circumstances had changed? Even in a more competent country, that information needs to be relayed to your employer.
Because those affect your tax liability.Why does payroll need to know if I'm married or not or how many kids I have?
My company knows for benefits/life insurance reasons, but that doesn't come from a W-4.
TBH, most people's taxes are very simple. I'd recommend a site like CreditKarma for people with simple taxes, since they have a free file for federal *and* one state.
I have to do them for the first time this year and its giving me crazy anxiety. I'm probably just going to pay someone to do them so i dont fuck it up. Hopefully i dont have to pay anything since i made very little last year.
In Canada we still have to file our taxes... But the CRA has something called EFile which is a standard that they certify tax software against. And they certify both free and paid tax software with there being a tonne of free tax preparing software, including a couple really fancy and easy to use Web Apps.I'm curious, how do other countries collect income tax? I assume their systems aren't insanely nuts like the US's?
In this hypothetical "W-4s make more sense to mute" universe payroll would know how much to take out of my check via some method other than how many kids/spouses I have OR if it has to be based on things like kids/spouses then they already know the answer because everyone already knows the answer and they don't need to ask me on that particular form. The questions being asked have right and wrong answers and what they are being used for do not. In over complicated jargon it explains this on the form, but to the average person I do not think it is clear, and could be clearer, along with everything else involving taxes.
I mean, even the previous form said "enter this number for your spouse" and "enter this number for each child". It's not that difficult to parse.In this hypothetical "W-4s make more sense to mute" universe payroll would know how much to take out of my check via some method other than how many kids/spouses I have OR if it has to be based on things like kids/spouses then they already know the answer because everyone already knows the answer and they don't need to ask me on that particular form. The questions being asked have right and wrong answers and what they are being used for do not. In over complicated jargon it explains this on the form, but to the average person I do not think it is clear, and could be clearer, along with everything else involving taxes.
I'm curious, how do other countries collect income tax? I assume their systems aren't insanely nuts like the US's?
In Canada we still have to file our taxes... But the CRA has something called EFile which is a standard that they certify tax software against.
Right, how to fill out the form isn't difficult, but the dollar amount each child and spouse represents isn't clear. People may not understand "each kid I say I have = 30$ more per check (ex.)" and also "I have 3 kids, and if I claim them here I get more money now" and "I have 3 kids, but there are reasons I may want to say I have 2, or 1, or 0". The kids/spouses thing obfuscates the implications of the form. How you fill it out determines how much money you can potentially get now vs. later, when they could just as easily have a form that states more or less "do you want more money now or later?"I mean, even the previous form said "enter this number for your spouse" and "enter this number for each child". It's not that difficult to parse.
Did the declaration for my girlfriend in Spain, after logging in to the online system with her ID and password I didn't have to fill anything, she had all her income already there and tax calculated. I just wrote her bank account number and they took the money some weeks later.I'm curious, how do other countries collect income tax? I assume their systems aren't insanely nuts like the US's?
That's dangerous though because all those people who choose "more money now" could easily come up short on tax day, not to mention the underpayment penalty. And where do you draw the lines for those thresholds?Right, how to fill out the form isn't difficult, but the dollar amount each child and spouse represents isn't clear. People may not understand "each kid I say I have = 30$ more per check (ex.)" and also "I have 3 kids, and if I claim them here I get more money now" and "I have 3 kids, but there are reasons I may want to say I have 2, or 1, or 0". The kids/spouses thing obfuscates the implications of the form. How you fill it out determines how much money you can potentially get now vs. later, when they could just as easily have a form that states more or less "do you want more money now or later?"
The upper end of what you can have withheld can't be more than what you make, so that is easy. And the form can still have the write in box of how much extra you want withheld, since that makes sense.That's dangerous though because all those people who choose "more money now" could easily come up short on tax day, not to mention the underpayment penalty. And where do you draw the lines for those thresholds?
The upper end of what you can have withheld can't be more than what you make, so that is easy. And the form can still have the write in box of how much extra you want withheld, since that makes sense.
How little you can have withheld is more complicated for sure, but I don't think it would be too difficult to estimate where the line would be where you would start owing, and I think it should be around there. There is a ton of data available to where (under normal circumstances) you should be able to get in that ballpark. Ideally, it shouldn't be possible to owe (but also, the whole system should be simpler). To me, that that is even a possibility in the current system is a problem to be fixed.
There's a difference between a complicated tax code and the process of actually filing simple tax returns. They already have a figure for you that you owe in taxes even if the code itself is complicated...they could just bill you instead of making you fill out the paperwork even today for the mast majority of tax payers.The tax code will never be unraveled, not so much because of TurboTax/H&R, but because Republicans and Democrats both need a certain degree of complexity to it so they can push various political agendas. Deciding how things do (or don't) get taxed is like 95% of the actual power politicians wield.
Not even trying to make a value judgment on that, it's just the way our government works. The decision to leave so much of the actual law, policing, and punishment at the local level made it so the federal government's primary levers for everything from strategic resource exploitation to social issues is handled through taxation. That's just how the United States do.
Doesnt your IRS have an app?
We have here over the pond. Just a few clicks and an id signature with the phone and its done. Takes a couple of seconds.
There should definitely be some kind of mandatory education around this. I know the first time I interacted with it, I had none. But also it needing a couple weeks or a few days to explain probably shouldn't be something we aspire to either.Pretty sure the problem here is that people should be given a mandatory class on basic taxes in high school.
I swear all this could be covered in two weeks. Probably less.
Funny thing is, it's only this way to piss off the middle class and let the rich steal more.
The Gov/IRS has all the data anyways. If they were property funded and tasked, they could send you the bill, you audit them, and they send the checks.
It be cheaper and more efficient for everyone involved. Which is why the GOP will never allow it.
You can still do all that without making everybody else waste time when they DON'T have those sorts of deductions. I've never ONCE used anything but the standard deduction, so filing my taxes is nothing but a waste of time, but I understand that's not the case for everyone.Well, if you are going to audit them, then you are doing your own taxes anyway, as you are just running the numbers second, rather than first. Also, my wife is 1099 and self-employed and she works from home. The IRS would not know all of the deductions she uses like a potion of the mortgage payment based on the square footage of the room she uses, internet bill, etc.
I would not trust the IRS to "do my taxes for me" and just send me a bill/form. I would rather take the time myself, make sure all legal write-offs are being applied and then submit it to them, putting the ball in their court to take the time and double check.
There should definitely be some kind of mandatory education around this. I know the first time I interacted with it, I had none. But also it needing a couple weeks or a few days to explain probably shouldn't be something we aspire to either.
Well, if you are going to audit them, then you are doing your own taxes anyway, as you are just running the numbers second, rather than first. Also, my wife is 1099 and self-employed and she works from home. The IRS would not know all of the deductions she uses like a potion of the mortgage payment based on the square footage of the room she uses, internet bill, etc.
I would not trust the IRS to "do my taxes for me" and just send me a bill/form. I would rather take the time myself, make sure all legal write-offs are being applied and then submit it to them, putting the ball in their court to take the time and double check.
Well, if you are going to audit them, then you are doing your own taxes anyway, as you are just running the numbers second, rather than first. Also, my wife is 1099 and self-employed and she works from home. The IRS would not know all of the deductions she uses like a potion of the mortgage payment based on the square footage of the room she uses, internet bill, etc.
I would not trust the IRS to "do my taxes for me" and just send me a bill/form. I would rather take the time myself, make sure all legal write-offs are being applied and then submit it to them, putting the ball in their court to take the time and double check.
Why can't the IRS just do taxes for people? They have all the info already.
In America, there's always money to be made.Why can't the IRS just do taxes for people? They have all the info already.
The lobbying machine is ridiculous for these companies.You know how much HR Block, Turbo Tax, and all these other companies make?
They're not gonna let it happen, ever.