I'm pretty sure that's a selfie. Who in their right mind would use a random animal as an avatar when there are hundreds of humans to choose from.i get it, cause its a dog and his avatar is also a dog. Very clever.
It's his gimmick, which was old a decade ago. And he probably doesn't even have the rights to use that photo of a dog.i get it, cause its a dog and his avatar is also a dog. Very clever.
i get it, cause its a dog and his avatar is also a dog. Very clever.
I don't get it.i get it, cause its a dog and his avatar is also a dog. Very clever.
It's not even as cute as my dog which can be seen on the cover of magazines.It's his gimmick, which was old a decade ago. And he probably doesn't even have the rights to use that photo of a dog.
He actually did give it back at the end:
Good boy status restored.
No, he ran ahead of her.
He actually did give it back at the end:
Good boy status restored.
y'all really don't understand marketing like i do
sometimes you steal a mic, sometimes you purposefully put shrimp tails in cereal, you do what it takes to get ppl talking ABOUT THE BRAND
y'all are just 14 year-olds
Came to the thread for this and I leave happy.It's his gimmick, which was old a decade ago. And he probably doesn't even have the rights to use that photo of a dog.
He actually did give it back at the end:
Good boy status restored.
Any publicity is good publicity.This isn't the way you want to get on magazine covers, Fat4all
Those aren't legally binding and you know it.
im under EULA
Why do you have such a hate boner towards him lol this is like the 3rd time I've seen you say something about himIt's his gimmick, which was old a decade ago. And he probably doesn't even have the rights to use that photo of a dog.