Oh no.If past games are an indication they will probably be the villains of the game.
Welp :/
Not necessarily, yar? Blood Dragon and Primal both have the protagonist on the cover.
Oh no.If past games are an indication they will probably be the villains of the game.
Welp :/
Racist cover, ugh. Don't like it at all. You should know better, Ubisoft.
There have been six Far Cry games with the protagonist on the cover. There have been three Far Cry games with the antagonist on the cover. It's just that those three got way more attention than the other six.Don't the villains usually get the cover spot, not the protags?
it's all the same, just like Far Cry 5.
I would love to hear your reasoning for why you believe this cover to be racist.
There have been six Far Cry games with the protagonist on the cover. There have been three Far Cry games with the antagonist on the cover. It's just that those three got way more attention than the other six.
The cover is obviously created to cause controversy, so it is inherently racist.
Dude chill out, I didn't mean it that way. I meant the color scheme.
I agree the industry needs to grow up, but even if the cover was designed to generate controversy (which I disagree with), that doesn't make it inherently racist.The cover is obviously created to cause controversy, so it is inherently racist. I thought we were already past these kinds of publicity stunts, but I guess not...
Gaming industry needs to grow up.
Racist cover, ugh. Don't like it at all. You should know better, Ubisoft.
The cover is obviously created to cause controversy, so it is inherently racist. I thought we were already past these kinds of publicity stunts, but I guess not...
Gaming industry needs to grow up.
Yep, this is absolutely a follow-up to 5 and I'd be amazed if it didn't use at least the height map, like Primal did with 4's map.The little church on the left and the silo behind it are straight from 5, so I wouldn't get my hopes up