I wouldn't be surprised if Russian controlled accounts were pushing this. They certainly loved portraying Euromaidan and the various color revolutions in Eastern Europe as CIA plots, and Morales seems quite Russian friendly (he was happy to discuss how the Ukraine conflict is the US and NATOs fault with Sputnik News).
Well, if you've got proof that it "was" the CIA, I'm sure the Bolivians would love to hear about it. Because from the sounds of things, they don't have any.
We're talking about a woman who headed a government responsible for many massacres, a woman who referred to indigenous people as monkeys and who allied with far right militia.
I don't know how Mueller brain poisoned someone has to be to think the intelligence community funding anti-left movements in the global south comes from Putin's porn bot accounts.
russian controlled foreign actor wikipedia.
The OAS sucks, and if it were for me, it would disappear. It is just another shithole full of corrupt pieces of shit. That being said, it can't be denied Morales was subverting the Bolivian constitution and using his cronies inside the supreme court to run for reelection again. It isn't out of the realm of possibilities he did fraud to get himself reelected.
Well let's just see if there's any news reports about the United States, Argentina and Bolivia from that time...
theintercept.com
Hm, nevertheless it's probably Russia
Vladimir Putin have supported the know leftist Bolsonaro in Brazil
Mueller? Lol, my comment came from at my disgust of Morales' willingness to chat with Russian propaganda outlet Sputnik and throw his implicit support behind Russia's invasion of Ukraine and their massacring of its people and how they're trying to facilitate a famine in Africa and the Middle East to force the west to back off etc. I think it raises a legitimate question about how long he's been a useful tool for the Russians.
A list of things like 50+ years ago, and most of them merely seem to be political endorsements of actions done by internal actors, rather than the US actually causing something to happen through direct covert intervention - which was the implication I reacted to here.russian controlled foreign actor wikipedia.
Ivanka along with the rest of the Trump presidency was a useful tool for the Russians. Ivanka traveled to Argentina on short notice before the coup with 2,500 Federal agents, an Undersecretary of State, almost half a billion dollars in aid, and supposedly met with people later involved in the coup.
The idea that Ivanka was chosen for some secret mission and somehow managed to bring a small army with her on her South American publicity trip is nonsensical. If there was any substance to it it would have been presented at the trial.
Take your strawman somewhere else. I never said Russia was involved in the coup, merely that promoting conspiracy theories about US involvement is something they like to do.
Lets not get away from the main issue here - his support of the Russian massacre of the Ukrainian people. But choosing to speak to a Russian state propaganda outlet makes it clear where his alliances lie.
ohh, she of the ridiculously large bible?
The main issue is one of the fascist coup leaders getting some semblance of fucking justice after massacres that the Bolivian people suffered. But you chose to ignore those and go "morales was no angel"
USA was involved in Dilma Rousseff's impeachment in 2016, 6 years ago. Juan Guaido was a decade-long american project. I don't know where you're pulling Russia from.
Why is it unreasonable they wouldn't present direct evidence of US involvement for fear of US retaliation? Why was Mike Pompeo pumping his fist and celebrating?
It's a clandestine attempt to influence and shape a foreign government, it's not all going to be out there in black and white.
Unlike the US media outlets that threw praise at Jeanine Anez, who then oversaw massacres of indigenous Bolivian people?
www.trtworld.com
Funny you say that because literally the only evidence I've ever seen for Moralles 'stacking' the court came after the ruling he could run again. Even that wasn't stacking it was the opposition boycotting the public election of judges.
It may be that the in-depth articles support that, but summaries on the page I was reacting to do not.
You're going to have to specify exactly what you're referring to regarding Rouseff. As for Guaido, most countries generally consider it valid to provide support to the pro-democratic opposition in authoritarian regimes.
Fear of what? The Biden administration retaliating for embarrassing Trump? Instead of, I don't know, celebrating getting more dirt to throw at him and the Republicans in the elections?
Lets not forget he'd previously done the exact same "I changed the constitution so now I get to run again" schtick that Putin did.
Some House Democrats are trying to do that
www.thenation.com
https://theintercept.com/2021/05/04/bolivia-coup-trump-mit-evo-morales/ said:
While I agree with your assessment of the OAS and Morales, I think the talk about Morales' behavior and the CIA mainly serve to distract from the bigger issue: The so-called free world raced to legitimize and support a coup because it installed a right-wing, West friendly president. Note that I am not accusing you of doing this. I quoted you because your post gives a succinct summary from which I can continue.
