• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Lotus

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
105,807
I think it's fair to say though that people's interest in Far From Home had little to do with the frequent intrusions from Happy and Fury. The film would have been every bit as good (arguably better) without them. All that stuff just seemed really superfluous.

For Happy sure, people would probably be indifferent, but I don't agree at all regarding Fury's inclusion. Looking at reactions for the trailers, people were clearly very interested in Fury's presence.
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
There's an interview around the time Homecoming was coming out where Feige called Spider-Man the greatest superhero of all time. This has got to sting for him. People asking why they put so much emphasis on the character when his future wasn't certain—it's because they love Spidey

Man, they gotta fix this
 

Deleted member 2793

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,368
Neither of the villains so far would have worked nearly as well without the MCU.
They would be better if they were Spider-man villains imo. Vulture was "ok" because it seemed more about how the rich don't care about the poor (even though they could do that without Iron Man), but Mysterio being just another "random guy mad at Tony Stark" made him a lesser character. These characters should have bigger connections to Spider-man.

The way they tied them into the larger MCU was so good. Especially Mysterio, his speech was hilarious
I hated it. lol It felt like the writers dumped all the exposition there. Why woulld he narrate his whole life and plans like that? Felt very unnatural.
 
OP
OP
Halbrand

Halbrand

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,616
They would be better if they were Spider-man villains imo. Vulture was "ok" because it seemed more about how the rich don't care about the poor (even though they could do that without Iron Man), but Mysterio being just another "random guy mad at Tony Stark" made him a lesser character. These characters should have bigger connections to Spider-man.


I hated it. lol It felt like the writers dumped all the exposition there. Why woulld he narrate his whole life and plans like that? Felt very unnatural.
Mysterio was great not just because of being caused in part by Tony but filling in the void left by the absent and dead Avengers as a new hero for the public. And of course filling Tony's role for Peter.
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
There's an interview around the time Homecoming was coming out where Feige called Spider-Man the greatest superhero of all time.

Here it is:

Starts at 2:36

"Spider-Man is Marvel's biggest character. He is the jewel in the crown. Such an amazing icon. He is a very different type of hero, quite simply, the greatest superhero of all time."

Kevin himself, folks.
 
OP
OP
Halbrand

Halbrand

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,616
Here it is:

Starts at 2:36

"Spider-Man is Marvel's biggest character. He is the jewel in the crown. Such an amazing icon. He is a very different type of hero, quite simply, the greatest superhero of all time."

Kevin himself, folks.

Pretty sure he reiterated this around FFH too
 

Vito

One Winged Slayer - Formerly Undead Fantasy
Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,062
Here it is:

Starts at 2:36

"Spider-Man is Marvel's biggest character. He is the jewel in the crown. Such an amazing icon. He is a very different type of hero, quite simply, the greatest superhero of all time."

Kevin himself, folks.

There. From the mouth of Marvel.

They fucked up badly.
 

Vidiot

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,456
I was already kinda feeling less interested in seeing all things MCU after Endgame, but this really kills off a bunch of interest for me going forward. Also I definitely won't be giving Sony any money for whatever they come up with.
 

Seesaw15

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,818
They would be better if they were Spider-man villains imo. Vulture was "ok" because it seemed more about how the rich don't care about the poor (even though they could do that without Iron Man), but Mysterio being just another "random guy mad at Tony Stark" made him a lesser character. These characters should have bigger connections to Spider-man.

This seems like a weird take. Aren't most of Peter's rogues usually just common criminals ,disgruntled ex-employees of Oscorp or freak accidents of science? Typically their only connection is that Spider-man bugs them while they're doing crime .
 

Lord Vatek

Avenger
Jan 18, 2018
21,510
Here it is:

Starts at 2:36

"Spider-Man is Marvel's biggest character. He is the jewel in the crown. Such an amazing icon. He is a very different type of hero, quite simply, the greatest superhero of all time."

Kevin himself, folks.

And yet he couldn't put out a movie that made more money than Black Panther. Or Captain Marvel.

I'm not saying I disagree (Spider-Man is my personal favorite superhero of all time) but I don't think younger generations feel the same and without him in the MCU, less and less people will grow up thinking that.
 

Deleted member 2793

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,368
This seems like a weird take. Aren't most of Peter's rogues usually just common criminals ,disgruntled ex-employees of Oscorp or freak accidents of science? Typically their only connection is that Spider-man bugs them while they're doing crime .
In comics and cartoons we usually see them with these origins but growing to have bigger personal connections to Spider-man, the MCU movies don't get to this stage. My favorite part in Homecoming was when Vulture had Peter in his car, but that was almost at the end. Mysterio was for the whole movie doing stuff just because of Tony Stark and Peter was just caught in the crossfire.

It also doesn't help when all bad guys have Iron Man as their origin, they basically did the same thing in the 3 Iron Man movies, Ultron, Civil War and the two Spider-man movies. Evil being born from small things sometimes is more interesting, like how classic Mysterio was just mad at his failed career as a special effects artist and actor. Not everything has to be "connected", it makes the movie less relatable and the world ends up feeling smaller because of that.
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
And yet he couldn't put out a movie that made more money than Black Panther. Or Captain Marvel.

I'm not saying I disagree (Spider-Man is my personal favorite superhero of all time) but I don't think younger generations feel the same and without him in the MCU, less and less people will grow up thinking that.
Those situations aren't directly comparable. Black Panther and to a lesser extent Captain Marvel were cultural milestones in a already successful movie universe. Spider-Man meanwhile had to wash the stink off a failed reboot and a third recasting. The fact that the outcry has been immediate should tell you everybody still loves Spider-Man. I honestly don't think any other hero would get this kind of reaction

It's also not like Spider-Man is going anywhere either. Someone will keep making movies, there's a preschool cartoon coming, endless merchandise...I don't see him ever becoming irrelevant
 

Conrad Link

Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,652
New Zealand
It's such a kick in the balls after the end of FFH, I marked out so much, was so excited for the future of Spider-Man!

Now I'm like ugh.

Honestly Sony need to pull off some multiverse thing with Tobey to get me excited for a non-MCU Spider-Man movie from them. Get dat Spider-Man 2002 theme playing in the trailer. It's the only thing that would save any kind of meeeh feeling from me.

If it's just gonna be current Spidey with their stupid Venom and they think that'll get people excited, nar.
 

Lord Vatek

Avenger
Jan 18, 2018
21,510
Those situations aren't directly comparable. Black Panther and to a lesser extent Captain Marvel were cultural milestones in a already successful movie universe. Spider-Man meanwhile had to wash the stink off a failed reboot and a third recasting. The fact that the outcry has been immediate should tell you everybody still loves Spider-Man. I honestly don't think any other hero would get this kind of reaction

It's also not like Spider-Man is going anywhere either. Someone will keep making movies, there's a preschool cartoon coming, endless merchandise...I don't see him ever becoming irrelevant
My point is that we've hit a point where the MCU is what dictates popularity of the character, not the other way around.
 

Border

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,859
In retrospect I guess this shouldn't come as a surprise. Marvel was willing to tank the X-Men and Fantastic Four just to spite Fox, ruining the commercial prospects of their own comics, videogames, and merchandise in the process.

Marvel was willing to completely ignore and disregard the mega-hype surrounding Incredible Hulk in the wake of Avengers 1, just because they refused to let Universal be the ones to distribute a potential Hulk movie. So now all we get is Hulk as second banana in Thor and some C-grade Bruce Banner sidestories in the Avengers films.

They got everything they wanted out of Spider-Man, so it guess it makes sense that they are willing to let him fall by the wayside now.
 

MistaTwo

SNK Gaming Division Studio 1
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
2,456
The ending of FFH very much allows MCU Spidey to disappear of the face of the planet with an actual explanation if no resolution is ever reached.
Ah, yes. I am sure all of the heroes of earth, Asgard, etc. who had recently fought beside the kid in what was basically a battle for the fate of the entire universe would just take a random news report to be true and write the him off as a murderous coward.

Makes perfect sense.
 

JCizzle

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
7,302
In retrospect I guess this shouldn't come as a surprise. Marvel was willing to tank the X-Men and Fantastic Four just to spite Fox, ruining the commercial prospects of their own comics, videogames, and merchandise in the process.

Marvel was willing to completely ignore and disregard the mega-hype surrounding Incredible Hulk in the wake of Avengers 1, just because they refused to let Universal be the ones to distribute a potential Hulk movie. So now all we get is Hulk as second banana in Thor and some C-grade Bruce Banner sidestories in the Avengers films.

They got everything they wanted out of Spider-Man, so it guess it makes sense that they are willing to let him fall by the wayside now.
That's why there's never been a new Hulk movie? WTF?
 

Einchy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
42,659
Ah, yes. I am sure all of the heroes of earth, Asgard, etc. who had recently fought beside the kid in what was basically a battle for the fate of the entire universe would just take a random news report to be true and write the him off as a murderous coward.

Makes perfect sense.
Nick Fury: I just gave that kid the keys to Tony's whole cache of tech but eh, fuck it.
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
My point is that we've hit a point where the MCU is what dictates popularity of the character, not the other way around.
Spider-Man, and probably Wolverine, are the exceptions. There's a reason people want those characters in the MCU so badly

You really can't replace them that easily. They are as big as they are for a reason. Spider-Man will never not be extremely popular my guy
 

RedVejigante

Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,641
In comics and cartoons we usually see them with these origins but growing to have bigger personal connections to Spider-man, the MCU movies don't get to this stage. My favorite part in Homecoming was when Vulture had Peter in his car, but that was almost at the end. Mysterio was for the whole movie doing stuff just because of Tony Stark and Peter was just caught in the crossfire.

It also doesn't help when all bad guys have Iron Man as their origin, they basically did the same thing in the 3 Iron Man movies, Ultron, Civil War and the two Spider-man movies. Evil being born from small things sometimes is more interesting, like how classic Mysterio was just mad at his failed career as a special effects artist and actor. Not everything has to be "connected", it makes the movie less relatable and the world ends up feeling smaller because of that.

Except that Mysterio in FFH is clearly embittered against Peter as well. It might be for reasons connected to Stark, but he certainly has a more personal vendetta against Parker than he ever did when he first appeared in the comics, where he was arguably just another bank robber with a gimmick.
 

Lord Vatek

Avenger
Jan 18, 2018
21,510
Spider-Man, and probably Wolverine, are the exceptions. There's a reason people want those characters in the MCU so badly

You really can't replace them that easily. They are as big as they are for a reason. Spider-Man will never not be extremely popular my guy
I don't think he won't always be popular I'm saying that the longer he spends away from the MCU, the closer other characters come to becoming as popular, if not moreso.

Heck you could legitimately make the argument that Iron Man is already there.
 

Border

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,859
That's why there's never been a new Hulk movie? WTF?
I don't think there's any actual quotes to support that common thesis, but it's really the only plausible explanation for why they stopped doing Hulk movies when the character (for a time at least) resonated so strongly with people. And it fits in with how petty Marvel has been about other IPs that they don't completely own all the movie rights for. If they are going to turn their back on Spider-Man, then Hulk sure as hell isn't going to get any attention from them.
 

Fj0823

Legendary Duelist
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,658
Costa Rica
I don't think he won't always be popular I'm saying that the longer he spends away from the MCU, the closer other characters come to becoming as popular, if not moreso.

Heck you could legitimately make the argument that Iron Man is already there.

This, all of it.

The MCU catapulted Iron Man to Batman/Spider-Man tier.
 

MoonToon

Banned
Nov 9, 2018
2,029
Forcing Hardy Venom into the MCU is not the right way to do it. That's something that should be built up to. Peter's in college now. Older. Experienced at being Spidey. Gets the suit on some alien planet in an Avengers movie. He should wear it for an entire movie or two. He takes the suit to Reed Richards after things get weird. When Venom first appears it should be terrifying because he looks just like spider-man has for the last 100 issues er- two movies except now his mask has a mouth. We just established Peter's Spidey-Sense and how OP it is when he focuses on it in FFH. How perfect then when this new villain doesn't trigger that sense because the symbiote has bonded with Peter before. Just as Tony inadvertently caused his own enemies (and peter's in the case of Vulture and Mysterio), Venom is Peter's creation. A perfect union between two beings that hate both Spider-Man and Peter Parker.

That is infinitely more interesting and the exact type of longform storytelling the MCU allows for and encourages than "hey venom showed up fight him". That's how you get another Batman V Superman

Venom is my favorite Spidey villain and one of the characters that got me into comics in the first place. Sony's Venom is fucking terrible.
You ... you fucking get it. :o

Venom is not something you can just plop down and be like "Ok, fight now!", it can be an amazing villain but it takes time and patience to build up to ... but would be such an amazing pay off!

Also, to anyone who thinks it's simple or easy to get a successful live action Cape flick out ... if it's so easy or simple why do they fail at it time and time and TIME again?
 

AlexFlame116

Prophet of Truth - One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 17, 2017
23,182
Utah
Mark Ruffalo on what Marvel was doing since they couldn't make a Hulk movie.


4:31 to 5:05
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
I don't think he won't always be popular I'm saying that the longer he spends away from the MCU, the closer other characters come to becoming as popular, if not moreso.

Heck you could legitimately make the argument that Iron Man is already there.
I mean, if you legit think Iron Man is bigger than Spider-Man idk that we're gonna see eye to eye. So much of Iron Man's popularity is tied into RDJ, while the character of Spider-Man himself will always be the main draw.

Like, I just don't think Marvel has anyone that will overtake Spider-Man as their most well known character. Especially since he will always be around in some fashion. Whether he's in the MCU or not. Idk if I'm overestimating Spider-Man or your underestimating him, only time will tell.
 

Lord Vatek

Avenger
Jan 18, 2018
21,510
I mean, if you legit think Iron Man is bigger than Spider-Man idk that we're gonna see eye to eye. So much of Iron Man's popularity is tied into RDJ, while the character of Spider-Man himself will always be the main draw.

Like, I just don't think Marvel has anyone that will overtake Spider-Man as their most well known character. Especially since he will always be around in some fashion. Whether he's in the MCU or not. Idk if I'm overestimating Spider-Man or your underestimating him, only time will tell.
I think a large part of that is a perception that comes from most of the internet being 20-30+ somethings who grew up with Spider-Man from the cartoons and Raimi films and such. I think if you ask kids and teens (Disney's main audience) who their favorite superhero is, you'll get very different answers.

I do agree that Iron Man's popularity comes primarily from RDJ but like, that's who the character is now, so there is no real difference.
 

Border

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,859
Mark Ruffalo on what Marvel was doing since they couldn't make a Hulk movie.
He's acting like he's totally won here, but I'll bet he wasn't really expecting major parts of Hulk/Banner's arc to just be skimmed over in Endgame's timeskip, or for Banner to be made to look kind of bumbling next to Tony's genius. If Hulk had gotten a proper film they would have dedicated time and genuine effort to his struggles, rather than making them mostly just comedic beats.
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
I think a large part of that is a perception that comes from most of the internet being 20-30+ somethings who grew up with Spider-Man from the cartoons and Raimi films and such. I think if you ask kids and teens (Disney's main audience) who their favorite superhero is, you'll get very different answers.

I do agree that Iron Man's popularity comes primarily from RDJ but like, that's who the character is now, so there is no real difference.
Twenty years from now RDJ won't be playing Iron Man. There will be a difference. We might discover people came for the actor and not the character.

Spider-Man has already shown that's not the case for him. People love the character.

Your point about 20-30 somethings might have some merit if Spider-Man didn't have a cartoon aimed at toddlers coming, a successful video game franchise, and more movies coming whether its in the MCU or not. The MCU has made it so that you'll get a lot more varied answers on favorites, but overall I still think saying Spider-Man will remain their biggest hero isn't a bold claim. Especially since as I keep saying he isn't going anywhere
 

Lord Vatek

Avenger
Jan 18, 2018
21,510
Twenty years from not RDJ won't be playing Iron Man. There will be a difference. We might discover people came for the actor and not the character.

Spider-Man has already shown that's not the case for him. People love the character.

Your point about 20-30 somethings might have some merit if Spider-Man didn't have a cartoon aimed at toddlers coming, a successful video game franchise, and more movies coming whether its in the MCU or not. The MCU has made it so that you'll get a lot more varied answers on favorites, but overall I still think saying Spider-Man will remain their biggest hero isn't a bold claim. Especially since as I keep saying he isn't going anywhere
No I mean they literally changed the essence of the character so that he pretty much acts like RDJ's version across all media and will continue to do so in the future.

And yeah, he's getting that stuff now because he's hot off two successful movies but he may continue to do so. Star Wars also got a bunch of stuff aimed at kids but as Disney is slowly learning, kids don't care about Star Wars as much as they thought.
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
No I mean they literally changed the essence of the character so that he pretty much acts like RDJ's version across all media and will continue to do so in the future.

And yeah, he's getting that stuff now because he's hot off two successful movies but he may continue to do so. Star Wars also got a bunch of stuff aimed at kids but as Disney is slowly learning, kids don't care about Star Wars as much as they thought.
Have you seen Spider-Man's merchandise sales?? Kids love Spider-Man

Listen man, we're going in circles. At the end of the day, I believe Spider-Man will remain the most popular. He will keep getting games, shows, and other merchandise. He will keep getting solo movies, either from Disney or Sony. If the Sony movies are good that's good for the character, if they're bad we'll get a new deal in the MCU and that's good for the character. Spider-Man will keep trucking.

What other marvel character can you say that about?
 

Lord Vatek

Avenger
Jan 18, 2018
21,510
Have you seen Spider-Man's merchandise sales?? Kids love Spider-Man

Listen man, we're going in circles. At the end of the day, I believe Spider-Man will remain the most popular. He will keep getting games, shows, and other merchandise. He will keep getting solo movies, either from Disney or Sony. If the Sony movies are good that's good for the character, if they're bad we'll get a new deal in the MCU and that's good for the character. Spider-Man will keep trucking.

What other marvel character can you say that about?
Yeah they do now. My whole point is that they may not continue to do so.

Regardless my original point was that the MCU doesn't need Spider-Man. If they get him back it will be because Sony's movies tanked.
 

MoonToon

Banned
Nov 9, 2018
2,029
For now. After a few years of no RDJ in the role, he'll fade away again.
I disagree.

It only takes making big enough impression to plant the seed in a generation's heart and making enough content for it to grow and grow.

I wouldn't be shocked to find that kids today hold Iron Man and BP and CM in their hearts right up there with the greats when they're old fucks like me.
 

Tace

Avenger
Nov 1, 2017
35,508
The Rapscallion
Yeah they do now. My whole point is that they may not continue to do so.

Regardless my original point was that the MCU doesn't need Spider-Man. If they get him back it will be because Sony's movies tanked.
Yeah, and I don't agree. Not with Spider-Man.

The MCU will be fine. But in the long run, so will Spider-Man. Either the new Sony movies are good or they tank like you say and there's a new deal. Not like Kevin wouldn't jump at the chance for him back
 

molnizzle

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
17,695
I disagree.

It only takes making big enough impression to plant the seed in a generation's heart and making enough content for it to grow and grow.

I wouldn't be shocked to find that kids today hold Iron Man and BP and CM in their hearts right up there with the greats when they're old fucks like me.
You are correct. Hell, on this very forum we have people who hold the Star Wars prequels in high regard because they grew up with them. Some of you in this thread probably feel that way. That's insane to me, but different generations grow up with different heroes.

When they reboot Iron Man in 10-20 years, people will go apeshit for it.
 

Deleted member 10612

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,774
What is stopping them from having the actor show up in the MCU, not being called Spiderman and not wearing the suite ?