• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

SilentPanda

Member
Nov 6, 2017
13,704
Earth
The European Union has struck a deal to initially pay less for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine candidate than the United States, an EU official told Reuters News Agency as the bloc announced on Wednesday it had secured an agreement for up to 300 million doses.

Under the EU deal, 27 European countries could buy 200 million doses, and have an option to buy another 100 million.

The bloc will pay less than $19.50 per jab, a senior EU official involved in talks with vaccine makers told Reuters, adding that partly reflected the financial support given by the EU and Germany for the drug's development.

The United States agreed to pay $19.50 per jab for 100 million doses, a smaller volume than the EU. But it has an option to buy a further 500 million under terms to be negotiated separately, and the price it will pay is unclear.

Pfizer and BioNTech declined to comment on the pricing. A spokesman for the EU Commission, which negotiates vaccine agreements on behalf of EU states, also declined to comment.

The prices agreed by the EU in previous deals with vaccine makers have partly been influenced by liability terms, which could cause large additional legal costs if inoculated people developed unexpected conditions because of the treatment.

French drugmaker Sanofi, which is working with GlaxoSmithKline as a partner, has agreed with the EU a price of about 10 euros ($11.8) per dose and did not get any liability waiver, while AstraZeneca would pay claims only up to a certain threshold if something goes wrong with its vaccine in exchange for a price of 2.5 euro per dose, an official told Reuters in September.

www.aljazeera.com

Europe to pay less than US for Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine

The EU has struck a deal to initially pay less for Pfizer’s vaccine candidate, an official source tells Reuters.
 

DiipuSurotu

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
53,148
Makes sense. They gave financial support for the vaccine's development so this just balances things out.
 

Vashetti

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,553
What did the UK pay?
Boris has spent £10 billion on these

plastic-syringe-toy-26280078.jpg
 

Kill3r7

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,430
This is nothing new. We continue subsidize the cost of medicine for the rest of the world.
 

elty

Member
Oct 31, 2017
1,954
$19.5 is a lot lower than I thought given who is the president over there.
 

Waaghals

Member
Oct 27, 2017
859
This is nothing new. We continue subsidize the cost of medicine for the rest of the world.
Well the article states that one of the reasons for this is that the EU subsidized the development, so I don't know what to make of your argument.
Also, just because you are getting bent on a lot of things does not necessarily mean that you are subsidizing other countries. You massively overpaying for education as well, does that money go to other countries?

The Military part, I can agree with however.
 

Kill3r7

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,430
Well the article states that one of the reasons for this is that the EU subsidized the development, so I don't know what to make of your argument.
Also, just because you are getting bent on a lot of things does not necessarily mean that you are subsidizing other countries. You massively overpaying for education as well, does that money go to other countries?

The Military part, I can agree with however.

Unlike education pharmaceuticals is easy to track. Look at any of the major big pharma annual reports. Pick your favorite EU Pharma company and pull up their annual report. The revenue numbers are a good indicator of where the bulk of their profits comes from.
 

Tapiozona

Avenger
Oct 28, 2017
2,253
EU bought 200 million doses at $19.50 a dose.

US bought 100 million doses at > $19.50 a dose.

Not seeing the issue here. That's how it works. You get cheaper rates with volume. If the US bought more, they would pay less per dose. If they commit to the additional 500 million you can guarantee they will pay less than whatever their agreed to current price is.
 

DiipuSurotu

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
53,148
EU bought 200 million doses at $19.50 a dose.

US bought 100 million doses at > $19.50 a dose.

Not seeing the issue here. That's how it works. You get cheaper rates with volume. If the US bought more, they would pay less per dose. If they commit to the additional 500 million you can guarantee they will pay less than whatever their agreed to current price is.
Who said there was an issue?
 

Kill3r7

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,430
You realize that Pfizer is "only" doing the testing but the vaccine comes from Germany / Europe, right?

You do realize this is not the only vaccine or medicine in history right? We (the US) overpay or are charged several times more for the same medicine that is sold in Europe. Germany for example uses a reference pricing approach which sets a limit for what a drug can cost. That is how they pay 30-40x less for insulin (Novo Nordisk) than we do. That is before all the additional markups.
 

NetMapel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,408
EU all-together has a bigger population than the US, even after discounting the UK. So this makes sense even on just an economy of scale aspect. I wonder how much Canada is paying though.
 

EloKa

GSP
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
1,906
You do realize this is not the only vaccine or medicine in history right? We (the US) overpay or are charged several times more for the same medicine that is sold in Europe. Germany for example uses a reference pricing approach which sets a limit for what a drug can cost. That is how they pay 30-40x less for insulin (Novo Nordisk) than we do. That is before all the additional markups.
No idea what this has to do with this vaccine which was funded from the EU / Germany that we are talking about in this thread.
 

Waaghals

Member
Oct 27, 2017
859
Unlike education pharmaceuticals is easy to track. Look at any of the major big pharma annual reports. Pick your favorite EU Pharma company and pull up their annual report. The revenue numbers are a good indicator of where the bulk of their profits comes from.
Yes, if they are allowed to exploit a market they will obviously generate more profit there, but that is not the same as to say that market directly subsidizes another. Looking at Sanofi, it seems that while large amounts of their profit is from the US, their profit margins are also rather high.

Now, I am far from an expert on this, and you seem to know a thing or two, but just because they are making a lot of money off the US, does not mean that their EU business is unsustainable. Why even operate in the market in that case?
 

Jon_Sama

Member
Aug 19, 2018
618
The United States agreed to pay $19.50 per jab for 100 million doses, a smaller volume than the EU. But it has an option to buy a further 500 million under terms to be negotiated separately, and the price it will pay is unclear.

Why would the US need 600m doses? That's nearly double the population.