My target number is for a completely passive $100k/yr. I figure that even with inflation, 80 year old wife and me could survive on that. Planning on that to come roughly equally from three buckets; SS, wife's pension, and our various retirement accounts and we hit that basically as soon as we decide to start taking SS.
This thread is a good example of the haves and have nots. At least some of the people posting in here about their favourable circumstances are able to acknowledge their privilege, but I just hope that everyone recognises that this is the exception and not the rule.
Being able to afford to retire in your thirties, or having an inheritance, or realistically being able to look forward to having millions set aside at retirement are all wonderful things but not remotely representative. I suppose there's an element of response bias here, and those in a good position are more likely to post about their situation.
None of this is a knock on those doing well, of course.
This thread is also a good example of fatalism becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If you don't take steps early for your retirement because you think you'll never be able to, well then... you won't be able to (except as noted in my example below, you actually could retire, it just won't be very cushy.) I always want to say two things in these discussions to hopefully dispel some of the fatalism:
0. I certainly recognize that there is privilege in this discussion and that there are people who can't afford a robust retirement, that's why we should support a robust security safety net.
1. SS is not going away, even if the fund is depleted (which is a political nuclear bomb,) it'll still pay out~75-76% of benefits
2. Small efforts early pay off thanks to compound interest/growth. At just 5%, your money more than doubles in ~17 years, and if you're able to keep adding to it, shit gets off the rails.
.
So two examples:
My mom was horrible with money. As a single mom, she was up to her eyeballs in debt even though my dad was good about child support. Credit cards, second mortgage, "invested" in a mini motor home that she had to use as her daily driver, decided to retire very early after she got laid off and is getting hundreds less than the average SS benefit. Her only advantage is that she's in a low cost of living area. It's tight, but she is fully retired on SS alone.
I'm not much better. I threw whatever the default amount was in an early job's Simple IRA for ~4 years. Wife and I inconsistently put a painless amount per month in a Roth IRA after that. Threw another default small amount in to a 401k at my current job until I got more serious about contributing after a promotion last year (2 pay periods before they killed the match due to COVID.) Wasted thousands of dollars and years in the market on a whole life insurance policy. It would be hard for me to be less investment-savvy, everything has been on autopilot in low risk mutual funds. And yet that
still projects to fund a third of a decent retirement income stream. When I finally sat down and ran the numbers, I was so surprised that I posted in the retirement thread asking what I was missing.
The people writing "my inheritance," it may be true but it is still gross.
Yeah, my dad and FIL could potentially leave us something, and my aunt (no spouse or kids) that passed away last year apparently left me something too, but I can't bring myself to even consider any of that in my projections. My dad has a really nice tool chest and a Paul O'Neill home run ball that he caught at a game he and I went to, if that's all I get, I'll be happy.