I know the history of this (trust me, I know) and I still can't understand why people want this platform to fail so much.
More money goes into developer's pockets and less in Gabe Newell's but YAY STEAM
you're an expert meme category?
I know the history of this (trust me, I know) and I still can't understand why people want this platform to fail so much.
More money goes into developer's pockets and less in Gabe Newell's but YAY STEAM
yeah and that was silly thenEGS itself invited any and all comparisons due to Tim Sweeny opening his gob about Steam and the Valve Tax and so on and so forth.
yeah guy is still making 15k a month from patreon alone even though steam spy has been broken for over a year and he hasnt worked on "fixing" it (if you even can)Self made business strategist, who would have thought he had no idea how to run a business. He ran a good con, what can I say. Between Patreon and Epic? He's made serious bank.
Self made business strategist, who would have thought he had no idea how to run a business. He ran a good con, what can I say. Between Patreon and Epic? He's made serious bank.
It never ceased to amaze me that the same guy who was saying "The indie games are too damn cheap" ended up creating a store that heavily relies on giving away games for free.
Oh yeah i remember that, didnt some publisher pull their games from the store because of that?Like a month later, the EGS had its first big summer sale and lowered game prices without contacting developers.....complete with epic-sponsored 10dollar coupons.
No one wants EGS to fail, people just want a reason to buy games there outside of game being time exclusive on it.I know the history of this (trust me, I know) and I still can't understand why people want this platform to fail so much.
More money goes into developer's pockets and less in Gabe Newell's but YAY STEAM
Oh yeah i remember that, didnt some publisher pull their games from the store because of that?
they pulled it from sale so it couldnt be used with the coupon, but it wasnt pulled from the storeOh yeah i remember that, didnt some publisher pull their games from the store because of that?
I know the history of this (trust me, I know) and I still can't understand why people want this platform to fail so much.
More money goes into developer's pockets and less in Gabe Newell's but YAY STEAM
I'm sure you're an expert on this matter. Btw did you know that the global PC revenue in 2019 dropped by over 20% and piracy has risen to long forgotten rates?I know the history of this (trust me, I know) and I still can't understand why people want this platform to fail so much.
More money goes into developer's pockets and less in Gabe Newell's but YAY STEAM
Not sure if they'll be exclusives (probably), but I wouldn't worry about the PC versions. In Remedy's case, Epic is funding 100% of both games in production, including salaries, QA, etc.i wonder if this is bad news for the pc versions of the upcoming games from remedy, playdead, and gendesign. pc gamers just seem largely uninterested in spending money on EGS, and unlike other exclusives these games are probably never coming to steam. we'll have to see if people will cave when it's an exclusive game from a dev they like.
the console versions will probably do fine tho.
yeah, i don't think the devs are taking any financial risks there. i just mean if they're gonna be disappointed with the PC sales.Not sure if they'll be exclusives (probably), but I wouldn't worry about the PC versions. In Remedy's case, Epic is funding 100% of both games in production, including salaries, QA, etc.
why spend money on the store that has conditioned gamers to just expect free games?
CA launched a DLC for Troy a few hours ago.I know the history of this (trust me, I know) and I still can't understand why people want this platform to fail so much.
More money goes into developer's pockets and less in Gabe Newell's but YAY STEAM
Because EGS is a store and Steam is a platform. Most people are going to buy on Steam when given the option because there's more features and benefits for buyers.Why not spend money on the store where its trying to influence people by giving free games?
It's not that hard, its not like the store is stealing your privacy information and targeting you for something.
Given your post it's not that you don't understand, it's that you didn't even try to.I know the history of this (trust me, I know) and I still can't understand why people want this platform to fail so much.
More money goes into developer's pockets and less in Gabe Newell's but YAY STEAM
Borderlands 3 made up a lot of the EGS revenue in 2019, something like 50%. The only game with the same clout in 2020 was Valhalla, but sales would be split between EGS and uPlay.I'm actually legitimately surprised revenue wasn't noticeably higher than the previous year, especially with all the big games like GTAV that got given away for free that could be making revenue. Perhaps I missed some nuance of the numbers? Supposedly Fall Guys, my favorite benchmark, may have made over $200 million on Steam in a few months, vs the entirety of 3rd party games on EGS making $270 million for the whole year?
I mean if you know the history of the whole EGS discussion on era then you should know WHY people want it to fail.
Its their strategy and way of doing things. No one has said in the past nor is now saying that it should fail just cause its giving more money to devs.
Epic and EGS literally are conducting practices unheard of in PC gaming territory and the actual bad thing is that these practices go against the philosophy of PC gaming. Devs being free to put their games where they want without any forced exclusive bullshit, companies not restricting access from the customers when it comes to content and services, customers having the option to choose and pick, etc. Customers/consumers or the market doesn't respect any entity that doesn't respect it and even if a company attains success using this way, they at least invest in their own platform via features and their own client, making it better. Epic don't even wanna do that without taking forever.
No one here wishes to serve Gaben and give money to him just for the sake of it. People like OPTIONS, FREEDOM to pick and choose. For them Steam is just the best option to do it for the most part. They put money into the pockets of the STEAM SERVICE. Now if that money goes to gave in part then thats a side effect.
Anyways personally speaking, iam really happy to see this outcome and honestly i expected this. The console market and PC market is different. Both have different priorities. The PC market doesn't really like exclusivity AT ALL or any other BS action that goes against what the PC platform stands for. As expected it only uses EGS to nab freebies and a lot of the people are who just redeem games and never or barely play them including me even though i hate EGS personally.
It's easy for Steam to embrace a "no exclusivity deals" stance when they basically have a monopoly. With more platforms coming along in the past few years, their position will be challenged on several angles. If they care so much about the "PC mentality", they'll keep their openness AND give fairer shares of profits to developers. We'll see how it goes, but they're a bad corporation just like any other one. More competition will bring different ways of dealing with distribution, and in the end, it's all good. Wishing for EGS to fail just for Steam to be reconfirmed in their shitty ways is just counterproductive to me.
Anyways, thanks for answering respectfully.
Exactly. And when did they do that? In 2010 when they had basically no competition? Nah. These things literally come because of competition.Valve already changed their revenue share to 25/75 at $10 Million
in revenue and 20/80 at $50 Million
in revenue plus they allow developers to generate unlimited Steam keys that Valve doesn't see any revenue from.
Me too, I do want more free games and then never play them.that's disappointing. dunno how they'll turn it around for 2021 but I hope they do
Exactly. And when did they do that? In 2010 when they had basically no competition? Nah. These things literally come because of competition.
I don't want any single platform to "win" (definitely not Epic) but wishing for some of them to fail in a huge trainwreck still sounds stupid to me.
At least they were apparently transparent about it. Had they not, you would have called them out for massaging the stats.thats what amazes me
no one is holding them to that image format
they can massage and present these numbers in any way they want to at least attempt to make them look good
and they didnt even bother to do that. put as much effort into it as features on their store i guess
I want a large part of their model to fail and never be attempted again. Exclusivity to a store is so unbelievably stupid. If it takes EGS with it that sounds like it's their problem, not mine.Exactly. And when did they do that? In 2010 when they had basically no competition? Nah. These things literally come because of competition.
I don't want any single platform to "win" (definitely not Epic) but wishing for some of them to fail in a huge trainwreck still sounds stupid to me.
Yeah I absolutely would have, you're right. I shouldn't give them too much grief because it's the better of the two outcomes. I'm mostly still surprised they did it and I think most other companies wouldn't have.At least they were apparently transparent about it. Had they not, you would have called them out for massaging the stats.
I mean Steam isn't a monopoly. Its not forcing other companies to use its service exclusiveiy. The only exclusive stuff on it is the service company's own games. As more and more consumers/customers embrace the platform, the companies keep putting their games on it. Valve simply just invests a lot in their own baby as opposed to making moneyhatting deals. Also i wouldn't say that they're a bad corp just like any other, they're one of the few places where devs really wanna work, they don't crunch on devs, they invest a lot in their product, etc. More competition isn't exactly 'competition', its just in EGS's case, shoving off the competition by restricting the customers to exclusivity buy on its own platform, a platform thats not ready for consumer launch, that doesn't even have a shopping cart after 2-3 years. Any disruption like that is detrimental to the PC market.It's easy for Steam to embrace a "no exclusivity deals" stance when they basically have a monopoly. With more platforms coming along in the past few years, their position will be challenged on several angles. If they care so much about the "PC mentality", they'll keep their openness AND give fairer shares of profits to developers. We'll see how it goes, but they're a bad corporation just like any other one. More competition will bring different ways of dealing with distribution, and in the end, it's all good. Wishing for EGS to fail just for Steam to be reconfirmed in their shitty ways is just counterproductive to me.
Anyways, thanks for answering respectfully.