Several people here have already explained how these situations are different, please read their posts from earlierI thought about it, both people didn't credit the original Creator... You can argue that there was more work involved in her part then Elons, obviously, but both stole someone else's work. It doesn't matter if she drew that from scratch, coming up with the character itself is part of the creative process. He should have credited her, she should have credited Akihiko Yoshida, it's a bit hypocritical of her to complain about it when she didn't... Elon actually should have credited both.
Yeah I know... Even I said it was different, she still should have credited the original designer and it was still hypocritical. No post is going to change that.Several people here have already explained how these situations are different, please read their posts from earlier
Did everyone consider that maybe.., this twitter account is those the official one ? Maybe is not him ? Just wondering...
A shame he didn't actually delete it though."Nier Automata Fan Art Forces Elon Musk Off Twitter" is not a headline I thought I would ever read.
Why even call her a hypocrite then? She's completely in the right to be upset that she wasn't credited. It should be pretty clear who was in the wrong and who wasn't.Yeah I know... Even I said it was different, she still should have credited the original designer and it was still hypocritical. No post is going to change that.
lol what the fuck shut upYeah I know... Even I said it was different, she still should have credited the original designer and it was still hypocritical. No post is going to change that.
have you considered that people know how twitter worksDid everyone consider that maybe.., this twitter account is those the official one ? Maybe is not him ? Just wondering...
Tbf, Newton was a renowed asshole and Einstein was borderline misanthropic, it's not a bad company for Elon "God's gift to mankind" Musk.Remember when people claimed that in the future he will be in the same tier than Einstein and Newton?
Basically this. I wonder what's wrong with him at this point.I really do love how this guy managed to completely torch the rockstar levels of good will he had in such a short time.
the guy is an idiot but he didn't need to credit the artist. why should anybody?
they're just sharing an image. it'd be different if he was using it to make money or pass it off as his own. if artists want credit in these situations (sharing over social media) then stick your name on it for goodness sake.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about giving credit (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in Texas where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you give credit to someone while in California, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.Heh, the Elon haters back in force I see. As usual people playing checkers while Mr. Musk is playing 4D chess on the other side of the board. It's amusing, you can't imagine living life at the pace he does. Our brains run at approximately 30% of their full capacity, science claims, but Musk has had scans that show his to be operating at roughly 70%, called the Jobs Region. It's obvious that Elon realised that if he'd tweeted out this "artwork" (Da Vinci it isn't) with credit zero people would have cared, and this person would continue to be of importance. No, instead, Elon decides to fall on his own sword for this 'artist'. To once again be cast into the public light, brandished as a monster all so that this person can actually get a scent of true fame. Like plankton picking from the whale. You people have the audacity to malign a giant of our times for this generous act, blind to the genius of it all.
I'm glad I'm not the only creature of culture here.I don't know how much the rest of you know about giving credit (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in Texas where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you give credit to someone while in California, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
I'm surprised how many techy people are in love with Musk and aren't aware what a shitty person he really is.Then, thats bad. How could he be so visionary and at same time so dumb.
Well, as we all know, usually too much money does bad to people.
the guy is an idiot but he didn't need to credit the artist. why should anybody?
they're just sharing an image. it'd be different if he was using it to make money or pass it off as his own. if artists want credit in these situations (sharing over social media) then stick your name on it for goodness sake.
You seem like a genius worth listening tothe guy is an idiot but he didn't need to credit the artist. why should anybody?
they're just sharing an image. it'd be different if he was using it to make money or pass it off as his own. if artists want credit in these situations (sharing over social media) then stick your name on it for goodness sake.
You don't think it's hypocritical the person complaining she didn't get credited, didn't actually credited the original designer of the work she drew from originally? What?
"sure she credited the creators generally, but not every specific person responsible for 2B specifically!"You don't think it's hypocritical the person complaining she didn't get credited, didn't actually credited the original designer of the work she drew from originally? What?
the guy is an idiot but he didn't need to credit the artist. why should anybody?
If I understood what you are saying, no, it is not. Each and every fan art is legally a property of companies who created these characters. If I'm drawing 2B, Square Enix can say "it's mine" and there's nothing I can do.but that doesn't take away from the fact that the digital painting itself is ALSO original work, which deserves credit
Even Yoko Taro retweeting this now... One thing is funny though, the artist has probably got way more exposure from this controversy than she would if Elon would credit her from the beggining.
If I understood what you are saying, no, it is not. Each and every fan art is legally a property of companies who created these characters. If I'm drawing 2B, Square Enix can say "it's mine" and there's nothing I can do.
That's why it always was shocking for me that Patreon artists can sell their fan art and nobody gives a shit (except for Disney, for a long time they gave a shit) when it's the definition of copyright infrigement.
Even Yoko Taro retweeting this now... One thing is funny though, the artist has probably got way more exposure from this controversy than she would if Elon would credit her from the beggining.
She didn't though? Check her twitter. She generally doesn't in most of her stuff that isn't originally hers."sure she credited the creators generally, but not every specific person responsible for 2B specifically!"
I don't think that expression means what you think it does. It doesn't really apply all that well here...if you keep bending backwards your gonna get shit on your forehead
Hey, who's the little robot in your avatar? Don't you think it's infringing on Sony's property to not credit the original designer?She didn't though? Check her twitter. She generally doesn't in most of her stuff that isn't originally hers.
I don't think that expression means what you think it does. It doesn't really apply all that well here...
When have fan artists ever been expected to credit every single person responsible for the character's creation? That isn't how this works. Musk literally right-clicked and saved this artist's art and posted it on his own Twitter on a website that actually has a feature that allows you to just retweet someone's post. He knew what he was doing, and when people called him out, he acted like a sad little baby. I don't see why you're trying to argue that this artist should credit Automata's artists for her own art of their characters. The two situations aren't the same.She didn't though? Check her twitter. She generally doesn't in most of her stuff that isn't originally hers.
That's not how fanart works, are you crediting the designer of astro bot? Why are you using false equivalences.You don't think it's hypocritical the person complaining she didn't get credited, didn't actually credited the original designer of the work she drew from originally? What?
I'm not, but I'm also not saying I made it or complaining about it not being credited. I can bet if someone stole my avatar I wouldn't say a word. I also don't have million of followers... I'm really not following your line of though here, your reasoning is making no sense at all.That's not how fanart works, are you crediting the designer of astro bot? Why are you using false equivalences.
Elon Musk has MILLIONS of followers and it's profiting of the art of someone who just got into 10k followers, if you, for whatever reason, think it's even remotely the same for him to post and don't credit than someone putting the effort to make fanart of an IP... I don't know what to tell you, pity to be you I guess.
Read above. You are really grasping at straws right now.Hey, who's the little robot in your avatar? Don't you think it's infringing on Sony's property to not credit the original designer?
I see.I literally making gymnastics to try to prove my point and looking like a jackass in the process