Game pricing and perceived value is a super interesting topic that will always be around. I can admit that I've passed on Links Awakening for now because of the 2 reasons listed in this weeks L&R. 60 USD is 80 CAD and it's not like we all make 25% more money up here to compensate for that. Hearing this new version , faithfully great though it may be , has a number of odd technical issues combined with the pricetag put me away from "must own" to "will wait for a patch + a time when I feel like powering through it".
I'm in my 30's so obviously I had a gameboy as a kid and I played through the entirety of LA twice back then. Bought it and finished it a third time on the gameboy color too. More recently I even had a playthrough going on the 3DS that I kind of petered out on. Point is I've played the game lots of times over the years and a fresh coat of paint with some QOL changes just isn't appealing at 80$ for me. I've seen the footage of how the game handles it's framerate and it looks like something fixable so , at the very least, waiting until that's working correctly is my own choice.
Do I feel others are foolish to support this game ? naw man. It really is a great Zelda game, perhaps one of the best 2D entries in fact. It was pretty much a flawless gameboy game in 1993 and based on reviews time has been pretty kind to it's oldschool mechanics. It's not like Nintendo marketed it as a new breath of the wild , it's "a beautiful remake of the game boy classic". It probably could have been released for 40 USD , hell I'd have bought it for that price without thinking but on the flipside - if you want a game and are having fun with it , the price shouldn't really be a factor.