Sadly, I am not sure this will work. As stipulated in the show (exclamation point): "Everyone who lost must write and perform"
Websters dictionary has many definitions of "write" (see attached:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/write?src=search-dict-box), that in some cases clarify a unique composition (to author) and sometimes do not (1c: to spell).
This means that an assumption of the wording "to write" must be taken into account, since all members of the contract agreed to the wording. In this situation the case that both "to write" as in to author and "to write" as in to spell may have both been assumed. If the non-drafter's of the contract assumed "to write" to mean to spell, a case that your video can be used in written form must be allowed. However, in the case that there are multiple non-drafters to a contract the assumption of "to write" must ultimately . . .
GO TO THE COUNCIL
Thank you Hoeg law for all of the invaluable information that you have given me last night. I am ready.
I am not a lawyer, nothing I say should be construed as legal advice.
