No this happens because in the context of the game it makes sense. Pretending this is a slippery slope argument has continued to look poor.This happens because consumers fucking allow it by still purchasing their product it pisses me off
No this happens because in the context of the game it makes sense. Pretending this is a slippery slope argument has continued to look poor.This happens because consumers fucking allow it by still purchasing their product it pisses me off
Sure but this particular type of advertising has been a thing in sports games for decades. I don't like it but there are far more egregious examples out there.Forward-thinking is a rare art, you're wasting your breath.
The companies do it because they know it'll work eventually.
Sorry, but with a company like EA, everything is a slippery slope. You give them an inch, and they're going to take several miles. There's just no defending that company when they try to sneak this stuff in. I just straight up disagree with anybody even being ambivalent about this if they're familiar with the industry. This isn't an Indie company making a mistake. This is a tactical decision from one of the greediest companies in the industry, and they're trying to establish a precedent. In 2020, it's "ah, that's not so bad". In 2025, it's a 30-second commercial.
So sure, I'll agree that saying bootlicking is over the line, but that's conditional on the person being ambivalent not being aware of what EA is and what they're capable of doing.
What we really need, and I doubt this will ever happen, is an end to exclusive licenses for shit like this. No matter what way you put it, with EA having licenses to names such as UFC, NFL and NHL they've effectively bought a monopoly on those sports leagues, and because those leagues are the dominant ones in their respective sports EA has effectively bought a monopoly on games for those sports. Just imagine how much better the world of sports video games might be the rights holders simply put a price on the license, and instead of the highest bidder winning anyone willing to pay that price could make an officially licensed game. Maybe instead of just getting an EA UFC game we'd also be getting 2K (not exactly saints either, I know) UFC games, so now EA and 2K are competing with each other and if one fucks up they have to worry about their playerbase moving to the other publisher's game. Or maybe Sony would also make a fully licensed NFL game just like they're making MLB games, so now EA has to worry about their players leaving for those games if they fuck up.We really need regulation, and it won't come from the ESA so government action is required
The industry won't regulate itself. It's about time for real change.
- Loot boxes
- Season passes
- DLCs
- In-game advertising
"Commercial" is lol-worthy. It's an ad. This is definitely a bit obnoxious but sports game devs have realized they can make their presentation more realistic and make money while doing it.
That's exactly my thoughts. Transition with a current picture ad. I was expecting a full video commercial. Haven't other sports games used this kind of thing before?
Remember last gen when a game like Rainbow 6 had billboard advertisements, etc in game.It would be really funny if we now get commercials next gen after we finally get rid of loading screens
So wait this is bad but the monster energy stupid product placement all throughout Death Stranding is fine? Alright ERA, okay. If this was something that broke immersion then sure I wouldn't be a fan but considering the context of it being a sports game and it only being one second then I'm fine with it, there's far more things to be annoyed about when it comes to games.
DS had almost fullscreen ads in the middle of gameplay or just product placement?This seems about the same level as the advertisements in Death Stranding.
They already are chock full of advertising though, the amount of billboard ads and product placements in games is already insane and I see no one making a big deal about it until now.The only reason that games aren't completely chock-full of advertising is because people complain about it. If people didn't complain, they would add more.
So, complain as loud as you can as soon as they pull any of this garbage, and they will think twice about doing it again.
Or we could just not complain at all because we wouldn't want to upset anyone. I'm sure that EA would be so grateful about how courteous we are being that they would immediately stop putting ads in games as a thank you for being such polite customers.
So wait this is bad but the monster energy stupid product placement all throughout Death Stranding is fine? Alright ERA, okay. If this was something that broke immersion then sure I wouldn't be a fan but considering the context of it being a sports game and it only being one second then I'm fine with it, there's far more things to be annoyed about when it comes to games.
This seems about the same level as the advertisements in Death Stranding.
We really need regulation, and it won't come from the ESA so government action is required
The industry won't regulate itself. It's about time for real change.
- Loot boxes
- Season passes
- DLCs
- In-game advertising
Kojima always does stuff like this but people suddenly care way more when it's a Western brand, like nerdy Metal Gear fans (like myself) didn't eat a bunch of Calorie Mates just because they were in MGS3. Fuck MGS4 had an in-game iPod WITH AN ACTUAL PODCAST BY RYAN PAYTONLmao that's a good point. Out of curiosity did people not complain about that or actually defend it on here?
I believe that's exactly the way the ad breaks look during an actual UFC event, even the PPVs where you spend $70 and are still advertised to. EA probably saw an opportunity to A) make the production closer to the real thing while also B) getting some ad revenue.
Kojima always does stuff like this but people suddenly care way more when it's a Western brand, like nerdy Metal Gear fans (like myself) didn't eat a bunch of Calorie Mates just because they were in MGS3. Fuck MGS4 had an in-game iPod WITH AN ACTUAL PODCAST BY RYAN PAYTON
Na we don't need any of thatWe really need regulation, and it won't come from the ESA so government action is required
The industry won't regulate itself. It's about time for real change.
- Loot boxes
- Season passes
- DLCs
- In-game advertising
It's just funny, and if it means he gets a little more money to go off with, fine IMO.I mean the Monster energy thing with DS has to be one of the worst in gaming, by far. I remember seeing a few people defend it by saying that it's "in your face" to the point of being acceptable, and I'm just like "Yikes."
Not to mention the ads for Norman Reedus's show and for that one music streaming platform.
haha nope not even when Playstation sponsors the Champions League and ends up with ads on other platformsJust a question, do the FIFA games have adds going around the pitch like in real life? Do people call those advertising in games too and get angry?
Somewhat off topic, but is Pikmin the only game where Nintendo has added in-game advertisements?Stuff like this is honestly more "intrusive" than what EA have done, but I also think it works, as the whole idea of the game is scavenging for objects. Adverts are okay if they fit in well IMO>