Oof, what the fuck. I didn't use Retroarch much in the first place but now it's an easy avoid.Most of Near's allegations are gone now as he'd wipe his forums and tweets peridocially to get away from this stuff. But you can see the retroarch lead (here under the name "twinaphex") referring to near as a "bipolar retard" and an "autist" in the below captured irc log, which should tell you all you need to know.: https://retroarchleaks.wordpress.com/2017/05/23/byuu/
I don't know either. But SquarePusher seems just an ass all around. Most of the emu devs have issues with him. Because he likes harassing the emu devs. And I don't know what this idiot is just getting by this. He is the typical benefit from others but without he is just an dumb idiot.Terribly sad :(
I don't understand why the Retroarch devs behave this way. Don't they realize that without the emulator devs they are nothing?
They should lift up and be thankful to every emulator developer instead of treating them like shit.
I do use Retroarch for a few emus that don't have a regular gui like Beetle PSX and bsnes but hearing this makes me wish I wouldn't need to.
Why do people have to be so shitty? :(
To be honest, I have seen several emulator developers with a diva complex over the years antagonizing Retroarch for forking their projects because they don't want to implement Libretro, and they are a minority.
lol what, they made that post and BOUNCED, closing account and everything.I mean. If multiple people have the exact same issues with the same person... who is in the wrong exactly? lol
LaunchBox/BigBox is what I use.
Some initial setup getting your stuff in there and associating it with individual emulators, but their front end is very nice and offers a ton of customization
The person who runs retroarch was one of the people who Near said used to harass him iirc. The reason I've never used it and never will.
I also remember the mGBA bit. On of the reason the core wasn't available for a short time.It's been knew. Retroarch/libretro dev has always been a toxic ass to the community. I remember when he cut-off the mGBA dev because she pointed out he used official PS3 SDK references (i.e. actual illegal shit), and there was a whole bunch of other garbage that I can't recall off the top of my head.
Can it do CRT shaders? It looks so much nicer than Retroarch but I can't leave unless shaders are there and all I can find is shaders via Retroarch integrations. Is it worth buying? I don't pay for Retroarch, but it's served me well over the years. I just don't want to use something that's actively ruining emulation on PC and driving talented devs away.
Shaders would be set in the individual emulators. LaunchBox is just a frontend that launches the ROM into individual emulators you would have to have installed. So any emulators that had CRT shaders could be used with LaunchBox
lol what, they made that post and BOUNCED, closing account and everything.
It is really odd. After that post happened. Libretro put out the Twitter statement. Just a coincidence? 🤔
It's a piece of trash that's a nightmare to navigate for anyone that doesn't read 300 million guides beforehand.
Wow. I have no words at that shit.
Hmm I'll play around with the free version for now and see how it is then.
Wouldn't it be possible to fight RetroArch with its own weapons here? Someone could fork it, make sure the cores give credit to the original teams that develop it, and strive towards a culture that makes sure improvements are done upstream (similar to the open source culture you have in the Linux space, for example).It would be nice if something came around to replace Retroarch that is designed to actually court and encourage emulator developers rather than alienate and steal from them. It's going to be very hard to convince people to go back to individual emulators, each with different types of capabilities and configuration management, many of which do not support things like CRT shaders.
Sure, RETRO I fully believe you.
you're still able to download it just fine. a project being read only doesn't mean it's lost.Damn, I just picked it up on github like 2 days ago, that was close.
if you find an asshole everywhere, you're the asshole. so disingenuous.Sure, RETRO I fully believe you.
...
What a joke. They did this before and they expect us to buy it. GTFO
You can get it here from Stenzek his git hub
Reminds me of Tony Soprano and his mom lolyou're still able to download it just fine. a project being read only doesn't mean it's lost.
if you find an asshole everywhere, you're the asshole. so disingenuous.
That, and some harassment, apparently. This is new to me too, and I don't have all the details yet, but it sounds bad.i am not really in the know here
retroarch claims they are forking people's work - allowed under GPL
what have they actually done?
stolen nonpublic code and attributed it to someone else?
LaunchBox/BigBox is what I use.
Some initial setup getting your stuff in there and associating it with individual emulators, but their front end is very nice and offers a ton of customization
To be honest, I have seen several emulator developers with a diva complex over the years antagonizing Retroarch for forking their projects because they don't want to implement Libretro, and they are a minority.