-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
DSOGaming: Sony did not pay for delaying Monster Hunter World on PC or for the lack of cross-play
- Thread starter IonMagus
- Start date
- Status
Last thread was funny because Nintendo did the exact same thing and barely anyone cared. Meanwhile, a rumor from a random twitter account and people are up in arms about bad Sony.
This's why I don't care about most of the reactions in here since a lot of it is driven by fanboy nonsense.
This's why I don't care about most of the reactions in here since a lot of it is driven by fanboy nonsense.
User warned: Antagonizing other members
At least you put more effort into this post than the last.
Part of me thinks that AsterisksAmpersand will quietly delete their Twitter account to avoid the incoming heat that they're about to be hit with, but I'm cynical enough to think that they will use this as a opportunity to more loudly self-advertise as the biggest source for MH data mining breaks. Pretty reckless behavior for the sake of e-cred, to put it mildly .
can you source that? you know, it would be weird if you did the same your thread is criticizing about
Yep, what's even more interesting is the fact we have unquestionable evidence that Nintendo paid $6 million for timed exclusivity (meaning to delay the PC version), and no outrage whatsoever around here, but what about a fake anti-Sony nonsense? Over a dozen page of drama right away!
User banned (2 weeks): Trolling, misrepresenting other members in order to mod-whine, cross-thread drama. This did not happen at all.
You think some mods didn't join the fun ?
OP
OP
Nintendo Paid "Around $6 Million" For Monster Hunter Rise's Timed Exclusivity On Switch
Capcom was apparently wary of making it a platform exclusive
www.nintendolife.com
I garuntee you that most of the people in the other thread isn't going to learn a damn thing.
I remember last night I saw that image outside of era and I thought "how did people come to any of these conclusions from this?" But I was so tired that I didn't even bother looking into it further. Turns out it was as much of a nonsense as half asleep me thought it was.
In general it has just become too easy to generate misinformation lately on anyone, it sucks.
In general it has just become too easy to generate misinformation lately on anyone, it sucks.
Right? I mean people never lie or get information wrong on the internet! The knee jerk reaction to a rumour is the most sensible response at all times.
looking at the era thread that this uses as a source nintendo only paid for the announcement delay and not the game delay?Nintendo Paid "Around $6 Million" For Monster Hunter Rise's Timed Exclusivity On Switch
Capcom was apparently wary of making it a platform exclusive
Am I missing something?
I genuinely don't understand how anyone could believe that Sony would pay to keep a game off PC and not Xbox when like 90% of Sony's current timed exclusives are still releasing on PC day 1.
Yeah, I wasn't actually looking for a definition and maybe my post come across as genuinely seeking an answer. One is clearly worse than the other and would definitely fall into the malicious category versus the other just being a bit frustrating. It's just that I wouldn't be altogether surprised to learn it considering the aggressive actions used in the market to secure some form of exclusivity. Although delaying the PC port specifically would be really odd because unless I'm not remembering correctly, MHW launched on Xbox day one which Sony would have more reason to target.
Anyways, it's irrelevant because the latest update says they were full of shit.
Nintendo Paid "Around $6 Million" For Monster Hunter Rise's Timed Exclusivity On Switch
Capcom was apparently wary of making it a platform exclusive
I'm here every day and barely even remember seeing this lol
So bitch was in fact NOT eating crackers! Who could have thought so
I went into that thread yesterday to discuss the news but saw how people were acting and noped the fuck out. So much anger and drama for nothing. Can't wait for this thread to also explode into many many pages..any minute now
I went into that thread yesterday to discuss the news but saw how people were acting and noped the fuck out. So much anger and drama for nothing. Can't wait for this thread to also explode into many many pages..any minute now
OP
OP
If I remember right this was first discussed with all the other stuff in that Capcom leak so attention was spread. I myself was way more interested in those Great Ace Attorney leaks lol
While I'm fully sure it could be true, the source in that article is ResetEra. That's not a source that's a liability haha.Nintendo Paid "Around $6 Million" For Monster Hunter Rise's Timed Exclusivity On Switch
Capcom was apparently wary of making it a platform exclusive
The more salacious or provocative the claim the easier it is to go viral, on top of some truth sprinkled in where in the case yes there was a marketing deal, but the details of the deal were nothing but bog standard stuff.
Right. I don't react to anything that's salacious or just seems to fit some weird narrative without evidence and/or a pattern of it rearing it's head. Just way too easy to get stuff wrong without corroborated sources.
It was funny how people made up a reason and anyone saying it still seemed weird was told, "read the thread", "we already know why", etc.
Anyway, it happens. That's just the internet.
Anyway, it happens. That's just the internet.
Big time. Isn't there a rule against creating threads based on tweets?
... Why not just read the actual source instead of Era?
Edit: lol nvm see their source IS Era
i'd do the shoot themselves in the foot honor meme, only if the thread was a little more self aware. people asking for lawsuits lmao
The people that believe everything a random twitter user says so passionately are the same people being tricked by Facebook fake news stuff and no one can change my mind about that.
the actual source is the same guy that was wrong about sony delaying the game on pc tho so, lol
I just want a better source chill
Yeah I also replied on the first page here how I'm glad it was wrong. What's the issue? I wasn't in that tread responding a dozen times. Sony blocking crossplay was not unheard of back when that contract was being drawn out so it seemed plausible and I reacted to that cause I have been wanting crossplay in world form the onset.
- Status