Okay....but why? Does china and/or nvidia have dirt on nintendo?
Okay....but why? Does china and/or nvidia have dirt on nintendo?
I don't get how that is even possible with how tight nintendo handles first party stuff. They are just fine with shield getting exclusive enhanced wii ports, only for china?
Or it could have been a part of the deal Nintendo made to have the Switch powered by the Tegra X1. Perhaps it helped reduce the cost?Okay....but why? Does china and/or nvidia have dirt on nintendo?
Of all the deals they made, it was to have enhanced wii ports exclusive to china...right when they had the switch coming out?Or it could have been a part of the deal Nintendo made to have the Switch powered by the Tegra X1. Perhaps it helped reduce the cost?
At a time where Nvidia was pushing for market penetration in China and Nintendo was fresh off the Wii U? I don't see what's so ridiculous about that.Of all the deals they made, it was to have enhanced wii ports exclusive to china...right when they had the switch coming out?
Nintendo? LOL. There's a reason why people used to compare Nintendo's old President, Hiroshi Yamauchi, to a yakuza crime boss.Okay....but why? Does china and/or nvidia have dirt on nintendo?
Well its a little ridiculous because the switch is 2.5 years in now and is just getting bottom of the barrel nes shovelware for its retroware.At a time where Nvidia was pushing for market penetration in China and Nintendo was fresh off the Wii U? I don't see what's so ridiculous about that.
Nvidia is making their hardware. Likely part of the dealOkay....but why? Does china and/or nvidia have dirt on nintendo?
Marvel has the Spider-Man IP rights but couldn't use him in movies until the Sony-Marvel deal. It's the same here. Nvidia is porting and has the rights to port. Nintendo holds the IP rights. Nvidia has the right to port some WII games(as far as we understand, maybe they have to GC or others console) and it's their work, not Nintendo.I love how people are saying "It's not Nintendo porting those games, it's Nvidia". Yeah Nintendo has nothing to do with those games, it's not like they are their own IPs and games. If Nintendo cared they could port them to the Switch too, this "it's Nvidia porting them not Nintendo" is bullshit, especially since we know how protective of their games Nintendo is.
I don't really see what that has to do with Nvidia porting Wii games to the Shield in order to garner a foothold in the Chinese gaming market. At this point, I can't imagine there's a large team at Lightspeed working on it.Well its a little ridiculous because the switch is 2.5 years in now and is just getting bottom of the barrel nes shovelware for its retroware.
I think people a speculating too much on this. Like NVIDIA gave Nintendo some huge discount on Tegra orders based on Wii games coming out on the Shield and only in China.
NSO is a SAAS that Nintendo wants for the future. They probably doesn't want to lose all the bullets they can add to spark interest to the public in continuing subscribed to their service. Maybe they will add SNES on Switch lifetime, maybe N64 on Switch 2 lifetime. What we know is that no matter the fanbase outcry/protest, they're not going to change their stance right now.Well its a little ridiculous because the switch is 2.5 years in now and is just getting bottom of the barrel nes shovelware for its retroware.
The issue is the online DRM they're using in these games which apparently is really hard if not impossible to crack as they're constantly talking to a server to verify the game's authenticity. And you also need a Chinese payment method to buy them, even if you import a Chinese Nvidia Shield TV.Since this is basically an android version of the game... I'm surprised that those Nintendo games haven't leaked? Or maybe they have? I never looked into that stuff.
I mean it's unbelievable that they finally have a system absolutely meant for a universal retro machine, and literally are doing the opposite with it.NSO is a SAAS that Nintendo wants for the future. They probably doesn't want to lose all the bullets they can add to spark interest to the public in continuing subscribed to their service. Maybe they will add SNES on Switch lifetime, maybe N64 on Switch 2 lifetime. What we know is that no matter the fanbase outcry/protest, they're not going to change their stance right now.
The whole value prop with SaaS is giving me access to tons of content, which I pay for monthly, yet Nintendo wants to drip-feed NES ROMS. It's baffling.NSO is a SAAS that Nintendo wants for the future. They probably doesn't want to lose all the bullets they can add to spark interest to the public in continuing subscribed to their service. Maybe they will add SNES on Switch lifetime, maybe N64 on Switch 2 lifetime. What we know is that no matter the fanbase outcry/protest, they're not going to change their stance right now.
I mean it's unbelievable that they finally have a system absolutely meant for a universal retro machine, and literally are doing the opposite with it.
Absolutely! I would really like to NSO be basically all Virtual Service games+ new games, maybe even unreleased games here. But Nintendo wants NES and it's sticking with NES. It's frustrating that even 3DS was better in that regardThe whole value prop with SaaS is giving me access to tons of content, which I pay for monthly, yet Nintendo wants to drip-feed NES ROMS. It's baffling.
And I like the NES. But it's not a competitive offering for today's marketplace.
I also think that would be the case. And if Nintendo ported these games, they probably would do a HD remaster like TP and charge $60 for themThe shield stuff was a joint thing between Nvidia, Nintendo, and iQiyi. If Nintendo wanted to do a HD port of Donkey Kong Country Returns in NA/EU/JPY regions it would probably be a completely separate thing as far as the corporate side is concerned.
The Dolphin has been there for years. And has an Android build too. This either an internal emulator or a custom build Dolphin.If I understand correctly those wii games are running on an emulator, so they are not ports. Which means there is a wii emulator out there that can run perfectly on the switch. Yet we are getting nes games.
Yay!!!
If Nintendo ever releases DKCR HD, they will probably add the 3DS levels
These ports aren't from Nintendo but from Nvidia.I'd give you money for these Nintendo. But no, you don't want my money.
One again a game already ported to the Switch that they wont release.
Shouldn't think so, it appears to be a slightly altered Wii versionDoes this version have the extra levels featured in the 3DS release?
Nintendo loves to sit on Money, I don't get how all those Shield ports aren't carried to Switch, it shouldn't be much of a job since the two things are basically identical in architecture.
It's only definitive if it also has the extra world and levels from the 3DS version
Yah, weird argument. Nintendo fully owns the rights to these games lol. They can do whatever they want. They may not be able to use to Nvidia ports as is.
But they can port these games themselves or hire a studio to do it.
Nintendo is extremely protective of their IP--look at how they go after fan projects and ROM sites. To say Nvidia is preventing them from porting these games to the Switch is silly.