Bit touchy, that.
I don't expect you to have in-depth knowledge about the inner workings of journalism, but you need to understand that "clicks" do not equate to revenue. I get a salary and benefits from a company with a business department that sells ads, posts deals, and puts together other revenue generators (that are thankfully kept very far away from the editorial team) in order to ensure that we get paid on time.
This thread really sucks and despite your sudden pivot to sucking up to me, I have no patience for your generic disparagement of my colleagues' hard work. You want to criticize an article or offer specific feedback, be my guest. You want to try to get a bunch of people to dogpile on Kotaku, GamerGate-style, based on absolutely nothing but gut feelings, vague nonsense about "clickbait," and a threat to put us on your ad blocker? Piss off.
Well that's a load of bull. If you have to open your thread with a statement like this, maybe you need to rethink the thread.
You won't find much, because we have a strict headline process to ensure that we're not publishing baity headlines. (Something like "The Last Of Us 2 Release Date Revealed" is a good example of clickbait, one that's used on many other websites.)For real. Like I'm going through a lot of pages and I really don't see anything that particularly jumps out to me as clickbait.
I remember when they were kinda cool years ago. I don't read them. I'm just surprised they're still active.
I wonder if Blue's News is still around?
I mean, Kotaku gets way more traffic than this place so it's not really that surprising if you're aware of the world outside our bubbleI remember when they were kinda cool years ago. I don't read them. I'm just surprised they're still active.
I wonder if Blue's News is still around?
The only poop that needs to be thrown at there, is those ironically outdated yet nostalgic Slowtaku images with the slow pokes lmao. Those never fail to make me laugh.this thread feels like it's tryin' to get people to poop on Kotaku for some reason
The reason being "A person working there made an article that implied Valve had done something wrong"this thread feels like it's tryin' to get people to poop on Kotaku for some reason
The only poop that needs to be thrown at there, is those ironically outdated yet nostalgic Slowtaku images with the slow pokes lmao. Those never fail to make me laugh.
I don't expect you to have in-depth knowledge about the inner workings of journalism, but you need to understand that "clicks" do not equate to revenue. I get a salary and benefits from a company with a business department that sells ads, posts deals, and puts together other revenue generators (that are thankfully kept very far away from the editorial team) in order to ensure that we get paid on time.
This thread really sucks and despite your sudden pivot to sucking up to me, I have no patience for your generic disparagement of my colleagues' hard work. You want to criticize an article or offer specific feedback, be my guest. You want to try to get a bunch of people to dogpile on Kotaku, GamerGate-style, based on absolutely nothing but gut feelings, vague nonsense about "clickbait," and a threat to put us on your ad blocker? Piss off.
Yeah I feel like OP mischaracterized Kotaku in a way that was unfair to the writers. I certianly don't disrespect them myself. I wish them the best and hope they have a great career. I don't want to antagonize anyone that likes or dislikes them, as too many people often do here.There is occasionally an overly casual tone that I'm not a fan of in the headlines or articles that I think people often label as clickbait, but on the whole I enjoy the site and I actually have been wanting to visit more.
This thread isn't cool OP
I used to, but less so these days.
Schreier has put out some great work in the past, but he has become a little too enamored with himself and his cult of personality lately. I know, I shouldn't care, the work should speak for itself, but when he goes of his way to tweet that he won't be tweeting as much because he has to write a second book about how he is going to save the videogame world from crunch or he responds in this thread with:
I'm sorry. Get over yourself dude. I'm realize I'm being petty and most likely just jealous but my distaste for his recent online persona has led me to stop reading Kotaku. As such, I'm not too familiar with Tim Rogers' work, so perhaps I am missing out.
he did not say that.schreier just above said that criticizing the site is tantamount to supporting gamer-gate... like who talks like that?
people arent going to like kotaku for whatever reason. but to label them as a gamer-gate supporter... oof.
on topic, i only really visit kotaku when gita or zack post.
schreier just above said that criticizing the site is tantamount to supporting gamer-gate... like who talks like that?
people arent going to like kotaku for whatever reason. but to label them as a gamer-gate supporter... oof.
on topic, i only really visit kotaku when gita or zack post.