It's not a retcon. It's a callback to The Brain of Morbius from 1976.
Why though?
Everything comes back to that haha
Maybe the pre-Hartnell Doctor used the police box disguise, then it broke and got stuck, and that's why all subsequent Doctors have hung around twentieth century Earth so much. It's just more convenient.Hmm, unless its a mistake on the shows part (you never know...) Ruth cant be a pre-Hartnell Doctor / incarnation as the TARDIS was the usual Police Phone Box design, which makes me think maybe shes an alternate universe Doctor and with The Master destroying Gallifrey, its allowed the universes to merge / caused some kind of fuckery to happen.
Given the roundels and her get-up, I was thinking an alt-sixth.Hmm, unless its a mistake on the shows part (you never know...) Ruth cant be a pre-Hartnell Doctor / incarnation as the TARDIS was the usual Police Phone Box design, which makes me think maybe shes an alternate universe Doctor and with The Master destroying Gallifrey, its allowed the universes to merge / caused some kind of fuckery to happen.
She didn't remind me of the doctor, not very eccentric, except from the traditional costume. But we don't how early this doctor is from, to be fair and Hartnell was quite a stern doctor too. It's nice to see a non-white doctor but I still hope 14 is as well since they're a lead.I also loved Jo Martin's performance. Glad we'll probably be seeing more of her.
Possibly, but then that would completely destroy the already shown scenes of Hartnell taking the TARDIS in its grey cylinder form from when Clara spoke to him.Maybe the pre-Hartnell Doctor used the police box disguise, then it broke and got stuck, and that's why all subsequent Doctors have hung around twentieth century Earth so much. It's just more convenient.
This just isn't well thought through if it is pre-Hartnell which it would appear to bePossibly, but then that would completely destroy the already shown scenes of Hartnell taking the TARDIS in its grey cylinder form from when Clara spoke to him.
Possibly, but then that would completely destroy the already shown scenes of Hartnell taking the TARDIS in its grey cylinder form from when Clara spoke to him.
Anyone who has a strong adversion to continuity changes in Doctor Who is delusional. The entire series from the start has been one long series of retcons. It's fine-just roll with it.
Was it though?
It was and as much as the show likes to change its history a lot, I dont feel changing that would work well given it doesnt seem like something that can just be ignored.
I'm going to keep an open mind, but the 1st doctor ran away from Gallifrey and him nicking a tardis was a great origin story before he took on that persona and start hanging out on earth. It's also sweet how the 1st doctor looked the oldest (except from maybe Hurt) and then got younger. 12 also met 1 just before he became the first woman doctor, so it was a meaningful loop and how the change into the 2nd doctor, mirrored the change into 13. It could weaken the legacy of the story if you do loads of incarnations before 1. It's not just about being against filling out the past.Anyone who has a strong adversion to continuity changes in Doctor Who is delusional. The entire series from the start has been one long series of retcons. It's fine-just roll with it.
I hope so.I imagine this is an alt universe Doctor rather than a pre Hartnell one. Stuff about the Doctors past will almost definitely come up for the whole Timeless Child thing but I don't expect there to be a bunch of unknown regenerations prior. Especially since it would take away slightly from Jodie being the first female Doctor.
The new show has been on 15 years. No need to worry about about it not being as popular as it once was. Even if it gets cancelled, it will still come back.The biggest take away for me so far, is that if this was done years ago, it would be all over the press, but now a days, it probably wont even get that much of a mention, which is sad, but understandable given its not a new and exiting show anymore.
Jack's inclusion probably wasn't necessary but it'll be interesting to see what the show does with him in the future.
I hope so.
I'm fine with retcons here and there. War Doctor, reviving Gallifrey etc., but this is entirely rewriting the entire history of the character, the motiviations. There's a retcon like Brain of Morbius VS Deadly Assassin onwards, then there's this.
People saying "Doctor Who never cared in the past", it's a potentially bit more extreme variant. There's changing things, then there's changing everything
Was it though?
Could be seen as course correction. The Great Intelligence changed things and Clara redirected The Doctor to that TARDIS. That's the way I interpreted that scene
The way I see, it's ok to retcon things. But the retcon has to better than what was already there and Hartnell being a grumpy and stern, old doctor and becoming more younger and goofier as time went on, is a great story and I don't think you could change that into something better.
Oh I'm not worried, I've been a fan of the show long before it came back on, but when David Tennant did the whole will he wont he regen in series 4, it was everywhere, and now, this, which in my eyes it just as big, wont be.The new show has been on 15 years. No need to worry about about it not being as popular as it once was. Even if it gets cancelled, it will still come back.
It does fit with the theory Chibnall's reviving the Cartmel Masterplan from the 80s, though, since they were already setting up a big rewrite of who the Dr was before the show got cancelled.I hope so.
I'm fine with retcons here and there. War Doctor, reviving Gallifrey etc., but this is entirely rewriting the entire history of the character, the motiviations. There's a retcon like Brain of Morbius VS Deadly Assassin onwards, then there's this.
People saying "Doctor Who never cared in the past", it's a potentially bit more extreme variant. There's changing things, then there's changing everything
The way I see, it's ok to retcon things. But the retcon has to better than what was already there and Hartnell being a grumpy and stern, old doctor and becoming more younger and goofier as time went on, is a great story and I don't think you could change that into something better.
But there hasn't been a progression like that at all. Hartnell was the oldest, but there's been a wide range of ages and levels of goofiness over the years. Hell, the zaniest Doc is probably the 4th.The way I see, it's ok to retcon things. But the retcon has to better than what was already there and Hartnell being a grumpy and stern, old doctor and becoming more younger and goofier as time went on, is a great story and I don't think you could change that into something better.
I have to say - when they were hyping this episode and were saying that it's a bigger shock than than the Master, I thought it was a bit weird and risky and how could they do that
I mean I thought Jack filled that and then they hit that with a fucking whammy in the rest of the episode for the arc