• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Do you think the US democrats should attempt to impeach Trump based on the Mueller report?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1,225 56.3%
  • No

    Votes: 373 17.1%
  • Wait for more investigations/evidence to wrap up before acting

    Votes: 579 26.6%

  • Total voters
    2,177

hurlex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,143
We need a second Poll to ask those voting if they would be complaining when Don and his cronies do victory dances in the press and all campaign about how he "beat the impeachment" and how the "Dems failed twice" etc etc. Because I get the feeling people are all for political theatre that won't have any real effect; right up until the moment that the other side can use it as a victory chant to rile their base and get the public feeling like ol Donnie has been dealt an unfair hand, but beat the unfair critics multiple times.

Or maybe we need a second poll to ask those voting if they would be complaining when the Democratic base becomes so disillusioned with ineffective leadership they decide to sit out the 2020 election.

Stop pretending like you know how things will play out.
 

lunarworks

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,123
Toronto
Keep in mind, Republicans probably would have tried to start impeachment hearings on Hillary over Benghazi/emails/whatever on her first day in office.
 
Oct 30, 2017
8,706
Let the history books show this fucker being impeached. He's not fit for office and clearly doesn't respect our laws.
 

Joe

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,592
We need a second Poll to ask those voting if they would be complaining when Don and his cronies do victory dances in the press and all campaign about how he "beat the impeachment" and how the "Dems failed twice" etc etc. Because I get the feeling people are all for political theatre that won't have any real effect; right up until the moment that the other side can use it as a victory chant to rile their base and get the public feeling like ol Donnie has been dealt an unfair hand, but beat the unfair critics multiple times.

Fair point. I don't know what I would do if Trump started celebrating unearned victories. Could you imagine?
 

DrewFu

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt-account
Banned
Apr 19, 2018
10,360
I'm still not convinced it could even get a simple majority in the House. It seems some Dems are against it, for whatever reason.

Hypothetically, if it couldn't even get through the House, that would be a massive win for Trump.
 
Last edited:

Freakzilla

Banned
Oct 31, 2017
5,710
It is meant as a check on presidential misconduct, not a check on whether "we have the votes".

"This is just gonna be fodder for Trump in 2020 when it fails" doesn't add up as valid logic. The people saying this completely gloss over the fact that regardless of whether the impeachment succeeds in removal from office, the procedure will still take place. Inquiries and public testimony will still happen. And if there's anything the Trump administration absolutely excels at is the ability to incriminate themselves, because they are as crooked as they are incapable of covering it up. It's an almost 1:1 mirror of the Mueller investigation: even no indictment was recommended in the end, it still produced extremely damaging, irrefutable information. The narrative will not be "Trump survived an impeachment, he wins 2020", it'll be "Republicans protected him despite being guilty as fuck". The evidence that will come out during the impeachment process will still be incredibly damaging. If you simply look at the end result and claim it's not worth it, by that logic Mueller should have never started the investigation in the first place. And no one would seriously argue that.

Punting to 2020 is not a valid strategy. It assumes the voting process will magically solve all our problems, despite the fact that the exact same process in 2016 created the mess we're in. 2016 is painfully obvious evidence that the voting process is easily manipulated. All evidence points to the process being even MORE manipulated in 2020, this time with a crooked president in office who will not only sit aside as the attempts to improperly influence the election continue, he'll actively partake and enable it, this time with far more power than he did in 2016.

Not to mention the precedence it sets. Impeachment becomes completely irrelevant if Democrats default to "don't even try it if you don't have the votes". Not only is the DoJ operating under the defacto policy that they will not indict a sitting president, now Congress will set a defacto policy that they too will not impeach a sitting president regardless of their actions if they don't have the votes to kick him out. Not impeaching basically would mean a president can be as corrupt and amoral as possible and nobody will come after you if they don't think they have the votes ahead of time.

1996 was a bogus impeachment charge on a president getting a blowjob. It worked for Bill Clinton in his re-election because the impeachment was a complete farce. The only people who would argue that a 2019/2020 impeachment is a witch hunt are the ones who argue that the Mueller report was/is a witch hunt. And yet we didn't give a shit about those people before, so why give a shit about them now? Not impeaching only gives credence to the idea that the original investigation was nothing, because the argument easily becomes "if Trump commuted crimes how come he's not getting impeached?"


You just made me change my vote.
 

Error 52

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
2,032
Even if they don't win, not doing an impeachment process would make the democrats look incredibly spineless.
 
Oct 30, 2017
8,706
This is going to put the findings of the Mueller Report front and center. "Total exoneration" doesn't work when it's Congress deciding. Republicans will actually be forced to play defense on TV.
 
Oct 30, 2017
8,706
Right now there is no good defense for his actions. Trump wasn't forced to act like this. He ignored tons of legal and political advice. Make the Republicans explain why this is okay. They can push back and say it's partisan but that only gets you so far.
 

hurlex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,143
Given what happened with Hillary and HER EMAILS, I seriously can't understand why people think that the narrative of Senate Republicans not removing Trump when there is blatant evidence of wrong doing would be exoneration. It will be that corrupt Republicans protected an obviously guilty man. Democrats need to use the hate of the Govt built by Republicans against them.
 

thefit

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,243
Muellers specifically laid out what he did in the report for the purpose of congress to do as the constitution warrants it.
 

Blue Skies

Banned
Mar 27, 2019
9,224
"The democrats these socialists, they are so incompetent let me tell you, they wouldn't even impeach me!"

Someone who's funnier reword this into a possible trump speach
 
Apr 9, 2019
552
CLT
His whole administration comes off as terrible in the report, what makes you think them coming to the stand and looking just as guilty on live tv will make this whole thing look like a witch hunt? Get him up there, have him repeat his 30+ "I do not recall", and when the republicans save his ass from conviction frame them as complicit accomplices to Russia attacking our democracy. They'll look like the partisans hacks they are and no one will be able to deny it cause it'll all be televised for everyone to witness.




I just don't think you're taking the mentality of his followers into account. Perhaps you're right that the ever elusive moderate will be swayed by such a display, but the Trump base is akin to a cult- adversity only makes their faith grow stronger. Again I'M not saying it's a witch hunt. But he will, and has, and largely it has worked.

We have to keep playing offense. There are a million talking points to defend against, "it's a waste of tax payer money".

The Mueller report paid for itself. Republicans don't care about the rule of law. You name it. Foot need not come off the throttle. If that's the best they got then so be it.
Republican senators voting to say that Trumps actions are okay is a gold mine.

Again, I agree. I would rather see them do it than not, which I want to emphasize that the current position of the Democratic leadership is to not do it. I'm a leftist but I live amongst these people. They're very susceptible to this messaging of victimhood. They crave it.

So again, let's do it, but let's make sure we can get him.
 

Sky Chief

Member
Oct 30, 2017
3,380
He needs to be impeached even if the Senate won't vote for it. At the very least let's get members of Congress on the record and prove that they really believe in Party over Country.
 

Allard

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,927
Right now there is no good defense for his actions. Trump wasn't forced to act like this. He ignored tons of legal and political advice. Make the Republicans explain why this is okay. They can push back and say it's partisan but that only gets you so far.

Yep the obstruction of Justice parts of this cannot be hand waved away as ignorant. In the filing he was warned under penalty of resignation they would not do illegal activity for him and even told him it was illegal and he kept trying to do it. The republicans tried to get Hilary Clinton thrown in Jail with mere accusation of potential misconduct because Bill Clinton (not Hilary Clinton) talked to Loretta Lynch on the tarmac and no one other then those two knew exactly what was said. They were willing to impeach on if she won that alone. What Trump did with irrefutable knowledge was like a million times worse, and he is still fucking doing it while in office which is another reason he needs to have his ass held to the fire. Get the messaging in a row but he absolutely 100% needs to be impeached at this point, conviction isn't the entire reason not to. Truth, accountability and moving forward is reason we need to do this, fuck what the republican senate has to say on this. They can vote to not convict if they dare, but it will be on them when history calls.
 

Zelas

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,020
Or maybe we need a second poll to ask those voting if they would be complaining when the Democratic base becomes so disillusioned with ineffective leadership they decide to sit out the 2020 election.

Stop pretending like you know how things will play out.
We know how things will play out. This isnt the first issue that became completely politicized and a turn off to relevant voters.

The twitter base isnt going to swing any election and if they're actually stupid enough to sit out an election because they will only accept impeachment, instead of continuing to stick with the strategy that is currently trouncing republicans, then they're certainly not worth listening to.

Dont talk about ineffective leadership while cheering on a garaunteed failure of an impeachment campaign. Play political games when you have the power to withstand it. Right now there are people in this country who cant afford a laser focus appeal to a fraction of voters in states we'll win regardless.
 

Socivol

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,660
Keep in mind, Republicans probably would have tried to start impeachment hearings on Hillary over Benghazi/emails/whatever on her first day in office.
Can you imagine if the roles were switched and this report was on Obama. The Republicans would utilize every ounce of power they have in the House to try to take Obama down.
 

IggyChooChoo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,230
We know how things will play out. This isnt the first issue that became completely politicized and a turn off to relevant voters.

The twitter base isnt going to swing any election and if they're actually stupid enough to sit out an election because they will only accept impeachment, instead of continuing to stick with the strategy that is currently trouncing republicans, then they're certainly not worth listening to.

Dont talk about ineffective leadership while cheering on a garaunteed failure of an impeachment campaign. Play political games when you have the power to withstand it. Right now there are people in this country who cant afford a laser focus appeal to a fraction of voters in states we'll win regardless.

You're making claims you can't back up. Trump's image as corrupt is majority public opinion and set in stone already. Shining a light on his corruption is probably good politics for that reason alone. Backing off criminality is the most discouraging, cowardly thing leadership could do to demoralize our base. Plus the precedent it sets — criminal presidents are above the law — is insane. You'd be giving Trump full approval to commit more crimes, foreign powers to steal our future elections, and future republican presidents to commit crimes. Sometimes you have to do the right thing even when you don't know the outcome. That does take some courage. But look at it this way: you only have to be as courageous as Trey Gowdy was when he first heard Hillary had a private email server.
 

XMonkey

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,827
We know how things will play out. This isnt the first issue that became completely politicized and a turn off to relevant voters.

The twitter base isnt going to swing any election and if they're actually stupid enough to sit out an election because they will only accept impeachment, instead of continuing to stick with the strategy that is currently trouncing republicans, then they're certainly not worth listening to.

Dont talk about ineffective leadership while cheering on a garaunteed failure of an impeachment campaign. Play political games when you have the power to withstand it. Right now there are people in this country who cant afford a laser focus appeal to a fraction of voters in states we'll win regardless.
Democrats can both impeach Trump and campaign on issues like healthcare, though.

Impeachment for the things outlined in the Mueller report would not be a "political game", either, but the proper way to hold the President accountable for the things he has done. In fact it's really the only Constitutional way we have to handle such a situation and it's what Mueller himself is suggesting should be the route to action.

People didn't vote Democrats into the House to sit on their hands in the face of blatant corruption and criminal action.
 

Socivol

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,660
Is anyone else watching Anderson Cooper right now? I don't understand why he hasn't cut this interview off.
 

Scrub Jay

Member
Nov 28, 2017
356
I expect my elected officials to uphold their duty and defend the constitution. Abandoning their duty because decorum demands it or because they are chasing the myth of political capital just does not give me the sense I am being represented.
 
Oct 29, 2017
5,354
What else are you going to do? You aren't passing laws with the Senate blocked, just keep toothlessly berating the Trump admin?

The cynic in me thinks Dems like Hoyer would rather squeeze this for brownie points ("grrr we hate Trump! Don't you hate Trump? We do! Vote for us please!") than to stick their necks out and get in on the line of scrimmage. The promise/threat to hold Trump accountable is more "electable" than actually holding him accountable.
 

onyx

Member
Dec 25, 2017
2,523
Trump's ego is off the charts. No way he'd resign

He's a bigger coward though. He won't stay and face the music if the GOP starts to bend. I think Muller would need come out and say that Trump needs to be impeached for that to happen. That's also the only way The Dems will move to impeach.
 

Deleted member 36543

User requested account closure
Banned
Dec 20, 2017
1,355
We know how things will play out. This isnt the first issue that became completely politicized and a turn off to relevant voters.

The twitter base isnt going to swing any election and if they're actually stupid enough to sit out an election because they will only accept impeachment, instead of continuing to stick with the strategy that is currently trouncing republicans, then they're certainly not worth listening to.

Dont talk about ineffective leadership while cheering on a garaunteed failure of an impeachment campaign. Play political games when you have the power to withstand it. Right now there are people in this country who cant afford a laser focus appeal to a fraction of voters in states we'll win regardless.
You are either a Trumper in disguise or you are a coward.
 

MistaTwo

SNK Gaming Division Studio 1
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
2,456
Not really.
I feel like the odds are too stacked against them and in general reps on both sides are too
corrupt and self-serving to actually hold him accountable.

What really should happen at this point is for the country to come together and hold peaceful protests to
shut the country down and force him to step down while the remaining investigations were done without any obstruction from him and his cronies.
Similar to what happened to Park in South Korea over what looked like a damn Jay walking ticket compared to the allegations and investigations we are seeing coming to light here.

Unfortunately, America is a broken society that can't even seem to come to a consensus that Trump is a fucking dumbshit so that will never happen at this point.

I am a hypocritical ex-pat who lives overseas though, so less skin in the game than most citizens.
 

Jon Carter

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
5,746
Before today, I was on the side of no, but the report is infuriating. If the Dems doing their duty hurts them enough in 2020 that they lose, then a fart in the wrong direction could make them lose. It might even help them to show that they're not fucking around.
 

Deleted member 3010

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,974
They have to, even if it'll be shut by the senate.

It'll be symbolic and show that there is a semblance of unity, principle and/or spine within the democrat party.
 

TheLucasLite

Member
Aug 27, 2018
1,446
I'm starting to come around to "fuck it, just do it and see what happens." Trying to predict the machinations of whether or not it will be politically effective come 2020 elections just isn't reliable. Too many factors make it unpredictable.
 

Kyra

The Eggplant Queen
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,244
New York City
If its going to happen it will take some time for it to materialize every dem needs to be on the same page and that takes time to coordinate.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,508
Denver
What separates "wait for more" from just the standard "no"?

If it's "no, but might as well keep investigating and maybe change course if something huge comes up", I don't know who would pick "no" instead.

If it's "no, because there's only one shot at impeachment and I believe everything will change with more investigation" I have to wonder where people think the bar is right now, and what in the world they think will surpass it.
 

Deleted member 10551

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,031
As long as 34 Republicans are loyal to Trump it will never happen.
Get rid of him at ballot box, then make his life hell as an ex-president.
 

Inuhanyou

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,214
New Jersey
Trump is a criminal, and he definitely obstructed justice. Does impeachment make sense? I dunno. But i would love for the Democrats to grow a spine and start being a real opposition party instead of spending so much time attacking their own
 

Rune Walsh

Too many boners
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,019
Impeachment is the first baby step they should take. I would have no qualms about going full fucking Bastille on this whole administration. Our government is a joke.
 

Mammoth Jones

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,298
New York
If they want to hand 2020 to Trump, go for it.

If they want to actually win stop pouting about being "right" and compete with your ideas to win elections. If that means having to water down the agenda then that's better than 20 more years of the Trump party.

I'd rather slow reasonable progress than just going backwards full stop. Impeachment isn't happening and is a waste of time.
 

Byakuya769

Avenger
Oct 29, 2017
2,718
What does the House filing for impeachment do? The public doesn't support it and the senate won't do a trial.

Focus on congressional investigations into the bonanza of bullshit going on with this administration.
 

makonero

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,655
If they want to hand 2020 to Trump, go for it.

If they want to actually win stop pouting about being "right" and compete with your ideas to win elections. If that means having to water down the agenda then that's better than 20 more years of the Trump party.

I'd rather slow reasonable progress than just going backwards full stop. Impeachment isn't happening and is a waste of time.
Slow progress loses voters. How can anything except radical change win an election these days!?
 

Notyou

Banned
Jul 31, 2018
164
Let me remind you all...impeachment =/= removal from office. Bill Clinton was impeached.