That's some serious mental gymnastics, and play on semantics.
Contrary to what one might think, the absence of belief is not equal to the belief of absence.
So no, Agnostic Atheism (or Gnostic for that matter) is not a religious position.
It is literally the absence of one.
Both of them are just assumptions though, in order to believe either gods or aliens you'd have to make a leap that just isn't currently there.Nah. It's different than aliens. Belief in Gods is far less justified. Life existing in nature is demonstrable. We somewhat understand the natural processes that can result in life developing.
If gods by their definition are "supernatural" then that is a much higher standard. The supernatural doesn't have a demonstration (honestly don't even know what supernatural is or how it could be demonstrated). So yes belief in aliens existing is maybe not currently justified, but belief in the possibility is justified. The same can't be said for God's. The possibility isn't justified there.
Both of them are just assumptions though, in order to believe either gods or aliens you'd have to make a leap that just isn't currently there.
Like I said, it's a question of worldview.
Back to the Zeus metaphor, if someone asked you if you believed in Zeus and you said no, are you agnostic or gnostic in regard to Greek gods? You could say that you're agnostic, since you can't prove they don't exist. But do you live in such a way that accounts for the possibility of it?
If you take the position that the Greek gods probably don't exist, but you won't take a hard stance because you can't prove it, that's a religious position. It's a value greater than zero on the scale of belief. If your level of belief is actually zero, I'd say that's gnostic.
Semantics can make this debate go all over the map. If you consider it a hard rule that any unprovable negative idea is, by definition, agnostic, then gnosticism doesn't really exist outside of cases of self-delusion. But I've always preferred a softer definition.
I'm going to equivocate both because I view believing in both as wrong with our current knowledge.I explained why the leaps are fundamentally different and not just in degree.
Equivocating both is highly fallacious.
I'm going to equivocate both because I view believing in both as wrong with our current knowledge.
I'm going to equivocate both because I view believing in both as wrong with our current knowledge.
We don't have a single example of a god, and we also don't have a single example of a lifeform originating from another planet.It's not the same thing, we literally exist so we have an example of life that could just be somewhere else but we just haven't found it yet.
We don't have a single example of a god, it's very easy to see how it's a false equivalency to say it's the same.
I'm just agnostic, I don't choose to believe one way or another. But I'm not apathetic, I ponder the nature of our reality and life on a regular basis. There simply isn't enough data to choose a side.
We don't have a single example of a god, and we also don't have a single example of a lifeform originating from another planet.
It seems to me that's just an attempt to justify belief in aliens without seeming contradictory to belief in gods, when the whole reason I don't believe in gods is a lack of evidence, same with aliens.One is not currently demonstrated but plausible and maybe even likely given our understanding of the natural world.
The other is a completely made up thing with zero support that doesn't not only make sense with what we understand about reality but may be fundamentally illogical.
But go ahead and equivocate to feel better.
But we live on a planet on a certain distance from a sun under certain conditions. The chance that there is another planet somewhere in the universe with similar conditions is very high. So the chance that there is some sort life somewhere else in the universe is very high.Both of them are just assumptions though, in order to believe either gods or aliens you'd have to make a leap that just isn't currently there.
The question is, if it happens, will you reconsider your faith?Show me species that exist from other planets and I'll believe it.
It seems to me that's just an attempt to justify belief in aliens without seeming contradictory to belief in gods, when the whole reason I don't believe in gods is a lack of evidence, same with aliens.
It looks kinda bad for all religion when we're reminded that there are more religions and ideas of god(s) than we can count, and many followers out there claim with absolute certainty to have a close relationship/connection with god(s), yet there's massive disagreement on things like who god is, what they want, where they are, etc. It's much easier to just ignore all the competing god claims.im kind of wondering why we dont see more arguments between theists in threads like this
atheists for the most part simply aren't convinced by the claims, but theists by definition think that competing theistic claims are flat out false
i'd honestly like to see that perspective more often, although now that i think about it i guess it just ends up looking like this
We know of mechanisms that could potentially allow for life to form, and we have precedent for life forming in this way, and we guess that multitudes of planets should exist with the right conditions for those mechanisms to take place and result in life. Do we have anything similar for god? What lab-tested mechanisms could contribute to the formation of a god? Do we know that a god has been born at least once before? Do we know what the necessary conditions are for god to exist, and if those conditions exist somewhere?We don't have a single example of a god, and we also don't have a single example of a lifeform originating from another planet.
Whatever that could even be
One thing I've learned from this thread is people truly lack logical critical thinking.....it terrifying.
Not talking about your choice in believing in God. More people treating 100s of years of research of math space and evolution as worthless trash. We kenow so much about our planet, our history, our universe yet people don't find that information interesting so they ignored or act like it doesn't exist.It depends on where you stand. You can believe in a God or in a Self-Creating Universe and still be logical. It's more when people make claims instead of opinions.
As an Agnostic Theist I believe in a god, but I don't think that makes my choice more logical than the other. If I did then I would have to provide some sort of evidence and if I can't do that then it makes me illogical. This works for both sides of the argument.
Of course I will, my position isn't that aliens don't exist, it's that I'm not going to believe in them until they are confirmed to exist.The question is, if it happens, will you reconsider your faith?
Lots of stuff from the bible have already been proven wrong, but the church always changes their stance on stuff.
Not talking about your choice in believing in God. More people treating 100s of years of research of math space and evolution as worthless trash. We rarely know so much about our planet, our history, our universe yet people don't find that information interesting so they ignored or act like it doesn't exist.
Do you put the belief in god in the same footing and belief in alien life when it comes to evidence of it existing? Which one is closer to being proved to exist, in your opinion?Of course I will, my position isn't that aliens don't exist, it's that I'm not going to believe in them until they are confirmed to exist.
It doesn't really matter which one is "closer" to being proven to exist when neither of them have.Do you put the belief in god in the same footing and belief in alien life when it comes to evidence of it existing? Which one is closer to being proved to exist, in your opinion?
Dont know if someone already asked you this, but what about evolution, you accept that as fact or you think it still need to be proven?It doesn't really matter which one is "closer" to being proven to exist when neither of them have.
I accept evolution as fact, because we have proof of evolution happening.Dont know if someone already asked you this, but what about evolution, you accept that as fact or you think it still need to be proven?
And was it one specific piece of evidence that convinced you that evolution is a fact or a compilation of evidences that science gathered that convinced you?I accept evolution as fact, because we have proof of evolution happening.
I always wondered why humans are the only species that "worship gods". I mean earth alone has nearly 8.7 million species yet Homo Sapiens are the only one who believes in "divine being".
Personally, i don't believe in gods.
Humans are a lot more curious and creative than other creatures. We also form complex societies which is pretty important for religionI always wondered why humans are the only species that "worship gods". I mean earth alone has nearly 8.7 million species yet Homo Sapiens are the only one who believes in "divine being".
Personally, i don't believe in gods.
I always wondered why humans are the only species that "worship gods". I mean earth alone has nearly 8.7 million species yet Homo Sapiens are the only one who believes in "divine being".
How do you know that some Dolphins, or Apes, or Ravens or Dogs don't believe in a god or gods plural?
What is your evidence that they don't?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignoranceHow do you know that some Dolphins, or Apes, or Ravens or Dogs don't believe in a god or gods plural?
What is your evidence that they don't?
People tend to have a hard time accepting that they only live a temporary existence and death is inevitable.I always wondered why humans are the only species that "worship gods"
He created the universe, then took a nap and put the alarm clock just in time to watch us masturbate.What was this god entity doing all this time before humans showed up? If the whole lifetime of the universe was a day, humans would have only been alive for the last 4 seconds. Maybe God is just really new to this whole God thing and created us as a test run. Give em more time.