I heard the bigfoot government put lockdowns in action to prevent the spread of covid
They're all pretty mad about it
I heard the bigfoot government put lockdowns in action to prevent the spread of covid
Yeah because two hicks would put together a monkey suit in 1967 that was more realistic than anything in existence at the timeI imagine that it's when stabilised and put in context of a wider scene it makes it more obvious that it's just a dude in a suit.
I heard the bigfoot government put lockdowns in action to prevent the spread of covid
They're all pretty mad about it
I mean it's documented lol.Yeah because two hicks would put together a monkey suit in 1967 that was more realistic than anything in existence at the time
ANE's money had also been used to buy the gorilla suit. It came from Philip and Amy Morris, established makers of gorilla suits for carnivals. They told Greg Long that they had recognized the suit when they saw Patterson's film on television, and that Patterson had asked their advice in modifying the suit to make the arms longer. They'd even shipped him extra synthetic fur, made from a material called Dynel. They also advised him to put a football helmet and shoulder pads on the suit wearer to make him look enormous. Not surprisingly, when Greg Long asked Bob Heironimus about the suit, he also mentioned that he wore a football helmet and shoulder pads inside of it.
Actually there is a lot of Native American folklore related to large hairy beasts from the forest.Also, no indigenous people has ever recorder in folklor the bigfoot.
Or even european-americans before 1958, when the Yeti became famous.
Or the fact that no primates ever lives in North America before Homo Sapiens crossed Beringia.
Much, MUCH better cryptid are the Orang Pendek of Sumatra (which had been spotted both by natives and dutch colonists and gathered credibility with the discovery of the Homo Florensis).
Orang Pendek - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The story goes that Patterson and Gimlin had developed a strong interest in Bigfoot, and in October 1967 they rented the movie camera and went off on horseback for a couple weeks to look for it. Next thing they knew, they'd become the luckiest Bigfoot hunters in history, when the creature obligingly stepped out of the woods and strode across the clearing for Patterson's camera, in the early afternoon of October 20th. Gimlin chased it on horseback, lost it, but found its footprints; then they rode about 5 kilometers back to camp for their plaster of paris. They rode back, poured plaster into the footprints, waited for it to dry, then went back to camp again. They loaded their horses into the trailer and drove 40 kilometers on rough fire roads back to Willow Creek, and posted the film off to Yakima to get it developed. It was about 4:00 in the afternoon.
The glaring impossibility of this timeline is what first raised suspicions among skeptics. In response, Patterson and Gimlin began providing all sorts of different versions of their story. Other suspicious cryptozoologists, such as Peter Byrne, found holes and contradictions in those stories. In the end, the version Patterson and Gimlin settled on was that they put the film onto a plane and flew it to Yakima, where Al DeAtley picked it up to have it developed. Byrne found that the only charter planes that could have flown that route that day were all grounded due to rain and bad weather. Since then, few serious researchers took Patterson and Gimlin's story seriously.
3000?Considering that the Bigfoot population is low probably around 3000 at most scattered throughout North America
See the short arms? Those are bears.Actually there is a lot of Native American folklore related to large hairy beasts from the forest.
The hairy man pictographs from the Tule River Indian Reservation is one of many.
3000 is my guesstimate scattered over all of North America...very low population density3000?
Three. Thousand. Bigfoots.
Even Mulder would be skeptical.
3000?
Three. Thousand. Bigfoots.
Even Mulder would be skeptical.
3000 is my guesstimate scattered over all of North America...very low population density
Gotta love skeptoid.The two behind it couldn't even get their story straight right out of the gate lol. No one has proven it "fake" because it's just footage of a guy in a suit walking in the forest. No one with merit takes it seriously enough to care since there was nothing credible there to start with.
The Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot Film
The true history behind the iconic Bigfoot film that launched the legend.skeptoid.com
3000 is my guesstimate scattered over all of North America...very low population density
Aren't apes generally social? How come bigfoot doesn't act like an ape?
Well you see that's because it's smart enough to evade being captured on film aside from the one time it didn't care and just slowly wandered around in front of a camera. Smart enough to evade being captured and to rinse its own fossil record, but still be seen by millions of people with no ability to show evidence of it.Aren't apes generally social? How come bigfoot doesn't act like an ape?
This is the 2nd Bigfoot in the Patterson Gimlin film that goes into the forest before Patterson stabilizes himself and pans the camera to the right to film Patty
This corroborates what Gimlin has said about there being several Bigfoot at the creek
Well I'm convinced. I believe in the bigfoot that believes in me. I shall stand tall and proud. May my vague silhouette from afar inspire more sightings.
Also the Patterson-Gimlin film has been around for almost 60 years and no one has been able to prove it's fake.
In the world there are around 1000 mountain gorillas.Also the fact that no bones have been found does not mean they do not exist . it's well known that predators hide and die in remote places when they are injured or sick. It's actually rare to find bones of bears, wolves and other predators. Considering that the Bigfoot population is low probably around 3000 at most scattered throughout North America, it doesn't surprise me that bones haven't been found yet.
Also the Patterson-Gimlin film has been around for almost 60 years and no one has been able to prove it's fake.
3000 is my guesstimate scattered over all of North America...very low population density
they burn their dead, then use the ash to make oatmeal.Why is there no fossil evidence of large primates in North America or their common ancestor etc? Did they dig up all the bones and hide them over millions of years?
Why is there no fossil evidence of large primates in North America or their common ancestor etc? Did they dig up all the bones and hide them over millions of years?
I got cut off by a guy with an "I BELIEVE IN BIGFOOT" bumper sticker yesterday, so no.
3000 is my guesstimate scattered over all of North America...very low population density