From what I gleaned off interviews like from Owl House creator Dana Terrace. Disney CREATIVE is super supportive but it sounds like financial Disney is the bitch.I hope this will backfire on Disney spectacularly. My impression is that a lot of the representation they do have is from creators pushing hard for it, creators they currently employ, who are likely pissed.
Chapek can't be binned fast enough.
Maybe Iger would have spoken out and done more about this but the heartbeat bill in GA was something that had a lot more of the public eye on it and a lot more outrage going. It would have been a lot easier for a CEO/corporation to "take a stand" over legislation that had was HUGELY unpopular already versus something like this that is unfortunately not talked about as much. The only place I've really heard any mention of the "Don't Say Gay" bill is here. If more people knew about this and were protesting it, it might've forced Chapek's hand but it's a lot easier to get away with at the moment than it could be considering how many different attacks are coming from politicians in damn-near every state.
I'm sure everyone who read this thread and said "fuck disney" has canceled their Disney + service and will never see a Marvel movie again…..
Still amazed Iger chose this guy.
i think he just pointed at whoever was shining his shoes on the last daySeriously. There was really no one else anywhere in the company?
it's 100 percent this. remember disney is only incorporated because of the florida state legislature. they can revoke this at anytimeI'd imagine they supported these people to make more money off Disney World, right? If so, no amount of backlash is gonna make Disney risk their $$$
Basically, sadly, the Board also got deep into Trumpism now so anything goes. Like I think the Board in California is also paid off and they want that Third Gate.it's 100 percent this. remember disney is only incorporated because of the florida state legislature. they can revoke this at anytime
they can want it but i can't see them getting itBasically, sadly, the Board also got deep into Trumpism now so anything goes. Like I think the Board in California is also paid off and they want that Third Gate.
Unless Anaheim gets desperate.
"Look out for more blink-and-you'll-miss-it scenes of gay people kissing!"
Disney Boss Bob Chapek Says Company Won't Slam Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' Bill Directly, But Still Committed To Inclusion
More of the same cowardly, empty, do-nothing platitudes as found in the original statement.
Oh, and in what shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody...
Didn't Iger personally choose Chapek as his replacement? What does that say about him in that caseHeard some stories about Bob Chapek too. Apparently he's concerned that Disney is seen as too liberal.
Bob Iger should not be put on a pedestal, but...actually yeah he might handle this differently.
Why Disney Won’t Say Much About Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” Bill
Insiders say CEO Bob Chapek is less willing than predecessor Bob Iger to take public political stands — including on LGBTQ issues and voting rights. The new Disney chief’s rep replies that he “does not bring any partisan agenda to work.”www.hollywoodreporter.com
Yeah, unless he faked for Iger, that is also suspectDidn't Iger personally choose Chaoek as his replacement? What does that say about him in that casp
Investor Day is Wednesday.
Shareholders:Imagine they do questions like the last shareholder meeting except this time it's just straight heat on Chapek
Remember this gem of an article? That's who're they appealing to
Not surprising. You mean incorporation in terms of zoning for their parks, right?it's 100 percent this. remember disney is only incorporated because of the florida state legislature. they can revoke this at anytime
I tend to think of it as "personal" vs "collective" boycotts where the former is more about being able to sleep at night and trying to be selective about where your money goes without the expectation that it'll materially change the status quo.Not to say that people can't cancel just because they feel it's the morally correct thing to do. I get it. But scolding others for not doing something that's basically just a gesture for your own peace of mind is really silly.
Didn't Iger personally choose Chapek as his replacement? What does that say about him in that case
Disney Boss Bob Chapek Says Company Won't Slam Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' Bill Directly, But Still Committed To Inclusion
More of the same cowardly, empty, do-nothing platitudes as found in the original statement.
Oh, and in what shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody...
Didn't Iger personally choose Chapek as his replacement? What does that say about him in that case
He's still involved?!?!Rainbow capitalism in a nutshell. Also don't look up what Ike Perlmutter does with Marvel money either.
buena vista lakes and ready creek improvement district are basicially private governments they're legal governments but disney controls their government completely with only the state constitution, state/federal legislature able to check themNot surprising. You mean incorporation in terms of zoning for their parks, right?
I tend to think of it as "personal" vs "collective" boycotts where the former is more about being able to sleep at night and trying to be selective about where your money goes without the expectation that it'll materially change the status quo.
buena vista lakes and ready creek improvement district are basicially private governments they're legal governments but disney controls their government completely with only the state constitution, state/federal legislature able to check them
Government
• Mayor Renee Raper • Council Member Tom Nedorost • Council Member Charles Reed • Council Member Mike Sheehan
The permanent residential population of Lake Buena Vista was 10 at the 2010 census.
Just watch, their investor stream in acouple days is going to go on about "how inclusive Disney's awesome content is" with no sense of irony or self-awareness.I hope this will backfire on Disney spectacularly. My impression is that a lot of the representation they do have is from creators pushing hard for it, creators they currently employ, who are likely pissed.
Chapek can't be binned fast enough.
He still has financial stake in the company, he just has no creative input.
Oh thank God. Inhumans was his baby if I recall?Just watch, their investor stream in acouple days is going to go on about "how inclusive Disney's awesome content is" with no sense of irony or self-awareness.
He still has financial stake in the company, he just has no creative input.
All the TV shows were under his perview until acouple years ago, before the Disney+ shows.