... Yeah why y'all picking on the little guy Sony!People siding with the company that owns almost every big movie franchise? really?
Huh?
... Yeah why y'all picking on the little guy Sony!People siding with the company that owns almost every big movie franchise? really?
Agreed completely!True, haven't seen Venom. But it's not because of that dud that all next non-MCU Spider-Man would suck. They have recently shown they can make a great Spider-Man movie. Just like the MCU-movies are automatically great. Far From Home made buck (so did Venom), but the movie itself was mediocre at best imo.
I'm not going to argue about the succes of the MCU, even though I have my critims. It's there because of the great work of the creative teams behind it, taking their time to build it up and striking gold with The Avengers (which they have Whedon to thank for too.) Other universes mostly proved that you can't force it. MCU's succes now is that audiences are really interested. Despite feeling some fatigue and suffering from diminishing returns, I still go see the new ones in the first week. It's like a soap opera you follow and can't give up.
Like I already said, not being in the MCU doesn't mean a superhero movie automatically sucks, just like being a MCU-movie automatically mean a it will be great (FFH was a dud, and lots of MCU movies are very safe and forgetable. It's mostly those thinking outside of the box I tend to remember and really like, like GotG and Ragnarok).
Disney bought Marvel for $4Bn and between Endgame and Captain Marvel, they grossed basically that much in box office receipts in the last 5 months, plus in that same period they just handed Sony their highest grossing film ever on a silver platter.Is Feige's secret sauce really worth nearly $300 million? Because that's how much they're giving up if they took this deal from Disney. Besides, Jon Watts was the director, so he mainly oversaw most of the creative portions of the film anyway. I like Feige, but he's not worth giving up that kind of cash for.
Fourth best maybeWow so much hate in this thread lol.. Sony just made the best Spider-Man movie of all time without Marvel called "Into the Spider-Verse". If they take what they learned from that film and make it live action they'll be fine.
You know Disney/Marvel is sitting there thinking that they were able to make GotG and other B tier Marvel properties into a huge success without paying anyone else.
They already have too many characters and not enough movies planned. I'm sure they figured out that they don't really need Spiderman.
The studio that made the most successful Spider-Man movies and made him more culturally relevant than ever is greedy for wanting 50% of the profits for movies they made entirely in their own while Sony just sat back and raked in the profits? 🤔no, disney is.
sony can make subpar spiderman movies which will make plenty of money w/o disney. disney got greedy.
He's running the show at Sony Pictures.
How is wanting to keep the deal they had being greedy? The had a plan when they made the deal and executed on it, it's not like sony surprised them and made spider-man a huge mcu character under disney's Noses. Everyone was happy with how things were working. Disney is the one trying to change things.
Not only does Disney want the spider-man money, they want the venom money and the morbius money too. It's kind of absurd to think just how much of Sony movie profits Disney is trying to take.
Yes, I'm siding with the company that displays competence versus the company that regularly displays incompetence.
In what world do you think the current MCU doesn't need Spidey????!
because sony should be smart to accept a 50/50 cofinance deal where they lose more bo return while marvel still getting all the merch. also, marvel would maybe help with other sony marvel movies. it didn't seem right in the calculators for sony so they said no. no one asks for 50/50 cofinance for little return.
LOL This is so delusional, it's almost sad. I'm trying to conceivably understand how not giving up almost 50% of their IP to Disney somehow makes Sony the bad guy. My mind is blown right now.
Amazing Spider-Man 2 despite relative fatigue and middling impressions still made $700 million world wide. A Venom solo movie just made $800 million world wide. The property is definitely elevated being associated with the MCU, but it would be far from dead.
They don't have eternal rights. I don't remember the time frame, but there needs to be something in production for them to retain them.What was the deal between Marvel and Sony again about the Spiderman IP ? Do they have eternal rights for everything not comic books or do they expire ?
The studio that made the most successful Spider-Man movies and made him more culturally relevant than ever is greedy for wanting 50% of the profits for movies they made entirely in their own while Sony just sat back and raked in the profits? 🤔
Meanwhile, the MCU/Disney shills have a collective meltdown and I have my popcorn ready
Spiderverse is hugely overrated. Not even Top 3.Into the Spidey-verse>>>>>>>>>>>all those other spidey movies.
Wow so much hate in this thread lol.. Sony just made the best Spider-Man movie of all time without Marvel called "Into the Spider-Verse". If they take what they learned from that film and make it live action they'll be fine.
Sony should of done that a decade ago. Still waitingGot it. Thanks.
Sony Pictures should just then use some of that money they've earned and hire new talent/producers, and make better movies. Like, damn.
Literally every live-action Spider-Man movie that Sony has made since the original Spider-Man 2 has been straight up ass, so yeah, they do need Disney.
Agree to disagree.Raimi was him and he won't be coming back, Spider-Verse was Miller and Lord they are too busy to touch this and Venom isn't good.
It's basically exactly what Disney wants. They didn't want to go into D23 without anything to say about Spider-Man, and leaking this story to the press frames Sony as being arrogant and fucking the character up for the third consecutive time. Sony gets pressured into making a counteroffer, Disney gets to make the good news in front of fans & press.Can't imagine this is anything more than negotiation tactics. Is this the first we are hearing of any negotiations, right? Seems an overreaction from fans on either side, tbh.
Okay dude
I don't understand why a 50/50 co-financing split between exactly two studios that are co-producing a movie is supposed to be seen as 'insanely greedy'?
They don't have eternal rights. I don't remember the time frame, but there needs to be something in production for them to retain them.
Like they did with Venom?Wow so much hate in this thread lol.. Sony just made the best Spider-Man movie of all time without Marvel called "Into the Spider-Verse". If they take what they learned from that film and make it live action they'll be fine.
I mean I hope they really work it out, if not maybe have the characters reference a funeral and not mention who died but we all know who it was....Well, this was the inevitable end, but I was hoping to at least have a few more years.
I don't even know how you move forward in the story without acknowledging that Spider man is no longer in the MCU
its still under Sony. Might be a different studio, but these entities aren't that far removed from another that they can't learn from the positives others do.
Their garbo Venom movie made almost 900M dollars worldwide. The ASM movies both made over 700M. Where exactly is the sense in giving up 50% of Spider-man's gross to Disney? Or any kind of substantial percentage?
Disney just got greedy as fuck.
Brink of madness? I'm saying it's funny watch everybody bitch at sony for not giving up 50% of their most valuable film asset, when they can EASILY make that money putting out trash. As pointed out time and time again, sony made nearly a billion with that trash venom movie and nearly 800 million with those trash TASM movies. a 50/50 cut even at 1.2 billion like far from home made, is 600 million. It's very very basic math. I would assume this also means sony gets merchandising rights back for their future movies, so that's even more profit. This is a no brainer for sony, stop laying it at their feet when disney tried to bend them over.
He is losing his mindGotta admit its hilarious to watch MCU fan boys having meltdowns.
Manabyte is having a full on mental break down on Twitter.
Tom Watts and Tom Holland are signed for two more films. Sony will make those without Fiege/MCU heroes.Damn, it sucks that they couldn't even give him a real send off
Sony still gonna make tons of money with unrelated MCU Spider-Man content if even Venom can make money for them, and if Disney really wants it that badly