That movie wasn't a success and that's why they don't do it anymore.
That movie wasn't a success and that's why they don't do it anymore.
I think it's more that they don't want to pay teams of animators. Not that 3D isn't labor intensive but it's more front-loaded and the infrastructure carries over so the more you use it, the more you can do with less. Hand-drawn, there are only so many ways to streamline the process. In the end, you're still running a sweatshop of artists drawing individual frames and backgrounds. And there are few things Disney hates more than labor costs.They'll probably realize no one is trained to do it anymore and give up.
The skill set has moved over to TV animationThey'll probably realize no one is trained to do it anymore and give up.
Kind of a joke but if 20 years from now it's still pretty much at CGI movies, you'd think the skill set may eventually fade away.
I do wonder if the skills are still as widespread as they were, with a generation of animators working in 3D for decades now. I guess art schools still teach 2D animation in their core curriculum? I mean, I doubt architects can draw as well with drafting boards if they are forced to compared with the generation before, you probably wouldn't draft techical plans and sections by hand beyond the first year of education.
Don't forget cute and fluffy.
I think it's more that they don't want to pay teams of animators. Not that 3D isn't labor intensive but it's more front-loaded and the infrastructure carries over so the more you use it, the more you can do with less. Hand-drawn, there are only so many ways to streamline the process. In the end, you're still running a sweatshop of artists drawing individual frames and backgrounds. And there are few things Disney hates more than labor costs.
They'll probably realize no one is trained to do it anymore and give up.
Kind of a joke but if 20 years from now it's still pretty much at CGI movies, you'd think the skill set may eventually fade away.
Almost every 3D animator can do 2D animation as well. Drawn animation, being a skill that is as simple as drawing many paintings, will probably never truly disappear.They'll probably realize no one is trained to do it anymore and give up.
Kind of a joke but if 20 years from now it's still pretty much at CGI movies, you'd think the skill set may eventually fade away.
It would be amazing if they could bring back some of the masters like Glen Keane, Andres Deja, etc. I believe Mark Henn is still there.
This is exactly what I was thinking.
Didn't know this! That's gonna be hype!Glen Keane is directing a 2D animated film for Netflix.
Can't wait to see what it will be like.
This is exactly it chief. Best of both worlds.
Bro seems like nobody remembers Winnie the Pooh 2011. It's a goddamn shame.The article mentioned there was a Winnie the Pooh movie In 2011. I'm not sure if that was a success or not
Well fortunately, or unfortunately depending on how you look at it, the division in charge of that was shut down.
Disneytoon Studios doesn't deserve blame for the low quality of the 90's direct-to-video "Disney Sequels".That was all made by Disneytoon Studios, which closed its doors last year.
As someone in the industry...
Is that the one about the mailman? What I've seen of that one looks incredible.As someone in the industry...
I understand this reference lol
Theres also a spanish 2d with some 3d parts animated movie that looks fucking bonkers and im glad netflix bought it at the end. Hope the best for them.
I think the proof is on us, actually. If they were more profitable they'd come back.
My hope was that DisneyToons could have eventually been salvaged to keep producing hand-drawn movies while the big guns at WDFA focused on their CGI stuff, but alas.Disneytoon Studios doesn't deserve blame for the low quality of the 90's direct-to-video "Disney Sequels".
The blame for those movies more accurately belongs to the former head of the studio Sharon Morrill, who was a Michael Eisner appointee/loyalist, and who was ejected after openly defying John Lasseter's authority, after he shut down their sequel operation (citing it's terrible reputation) and stopped Morrill from burning hundreds of millions of Disney's dollars on her own personal Tinkerbell fanfiction.
When the director of "Pocahontas 2" was ordered to make "Pocahontas 2", he allegedly asked to have a copy of Pocahontas 1, and was told by his superiors "It's not out on VHS yet, so no. Have the script on my desk by Tuesday." So he walked into Disneytoon Studios and asked "Has anybody seen Pocahontas 1? And if so, can you tell me what happened in that movie?"
Under those sorts of conditions, the only surprising thing is that the hardworking artists at Disneytoon (through their entirely unappreciated efforts) managed to make anything remotely watchable.
The Tinkerbell series of movies made after Eisner/Morrill in the Lasseter era are mostly solid kids movies (if you're considering watching them, they're more "for kids" than the all-ages approach of something like Pixar, so keep that in mind). I would say that at least three of them are really good, with only one that I'd say was "bad".
It's a shame that in their final years, Lasseter (like Morrill before him) started using Disneytoon as his own personal vanity studio, and made them work on "Cars" spinoffs because Pixar refused. It's also a shame about Lasseter's "sexual assault/harassment thing", considering that his time with Disneytoon began with him getting into a fight with a female executive. Really makes you side-eye the whole sordid affair.
YUP!Is that the one about the mailman? What I've seen of that one looks incredible.