I'm pleasantly surprised at how little you sacrifice by doing this.Looks like no need to have any back compat games on the internal drive then.
I'm pleasantly surprised at how little you sacrifice by doing this.Looks like no need to have any back compat games on the internal drive then.
Oh that's cool. Still an expensive option though.It's been confirmed that quick resume does work on external SSD's.
Faster loading timesThank you. I am still a little confused over what benefits non-patched games can get from Series X lol.
NVME is faster basically. However it's still trying to get through the same 5gps interface so copying back read speeds will be similar(ish).Guess I am trying to figure out, what was the limiting factor, the QVO read/write being smaller than the NVMe or the SATA to USB interface? For the NVMe having almost twice the write speed as the QVO, shouldn't it have copied faster?
Edit: I mean the NVMe did complete the job 6 minutes faster, so that does match up actually.
Wait for for my Xbox One and PS4 games to run optimally on PS5 and XSX, I'll need to use an external SSD?
No. It's just that BC games run almost as well on external SSDs.Wait for for my Xbox One and PS4 games to run optimally on PS5 and XSX, I'll need to use an external SSD?
And since internal space is limited and proper expansion options are quite expensive, external SSD makes the most sense for the $.No. It's just that BC games run almost as well on external SSDs.
Faster loading times
Auto-HDR for games that didn't have HDR before
Higher framerate if they ran at unlocked framerates or if they didn't hit their framerate target they will probably now
Games with variable resolutions will hit higher resolutions more often
Thank you. So as I understand it - tell me if I'm wrong - unpatched Xbox One games can see some benefits from the Series X like auto-HDR, quicker load times (if on the internal drive or a quicker drive than Xbox One), more stable framerate. But any game with a patch for Series X will need to run from the internal SSD.
If they had used a TLC SSD instead of QLC it probably would have been pretty similar.Edit: I mean the NVMe did complete the job 6 minutes faster, so that does match up actually.
Optimal performance is still the internal.And since internal space is limited and proper expansion options are quite expensive, external SSD makes the most sense for the $.
You are right.
Unpatched games:
All games are getting HDR.
All games which are One X enhanced should run in "One X mode"
All games are getting 3x to 6x faster load times (internal or external SSD makes little difference if the SSD is quick enough)
Most/every performance issue games might have had on One/One X should get ironed out.
Games with uncapped framerates get a near 2x boost in fps (as per DF analysis) compared to One X.
Games with dynamic resolution should stick to 4k (or whatever the cap is) most of the time
Games receiving a Series X patch:
Become "Series X games" for all intents and purposes and will need to run from the internal NVME, and should be taking advantage of velocity architecture, resulting in even faster load times (possibly MUCH faster) and may get other enhancements.
Forza Horizon 4 should have graphics settings beyond PC Ultra while running in 4k60
Gears 5 is receiving a similar upgrade and a 120fps mode.
No, it's just that there are speed improvements even on relatively "slower" external drives, which is an easy way to save full-speed space on the fancy internal drive for next-gen games. The video's worth watching, if you're thinking about storage space options for the new systems.
No. It's just that BC games run almost as well on external SSDs.
Capacity is so low, you may as well just transfer from the HDD to the internal.If I've got an external 4TB hdd, is there any point me also using an old Crucial 240GB ssd?
It's either the first one or the second one iirc:
Crucial BX500 240GB 3D NAND SATA 2.5-inch SSD | CT240BX500SSD1 | Crucial UK
Buy Crucial BX500 240GB 3D NAND SATA 2.5-inch SSD CT240BX500SSD1. FREE US Delivery, guaranteed 100% compatibility when ordering using our online tools.uk.crucial.comCrucial MX500 250 GB CT250MX500SSD1(Z)-Up to 560 MB/s (3D NAND, SATA, 2.5 Inch, Internal SSD): Amazon.co.uk: Computers & Accessories
Buy Crucial MX500 250 GB CT250MX500SSD1(Z)-Up to 560 MB/s (3D NAND, SATA, 2.5 Inch, Internal SSD) at Amazon UK. Free delivery and return on eligible orders.www.amazon.co.uk
Yep, that's it.Thank you. So as I understand it - tell me if I'm wrong - unpatched Xbox One games can see some benefits from the Series X like auto-HDR, quicker load times (if on the internal drive or a quicker drive than Xbox One), more stable framerate. But any game with a patch for Series X will need to run from the internal SSD.
Have you watched the video? It's basically the same for legacy games.
Capacity is so low, you may as well just transfer from the HDD to the internal.
First game I'm playing on the Xbox
It could be a dedicated CoD SSD if you are into that game 😂
Yeah I remember reading that the QVO is notorious for that. Wonder if someone is going to do any extensive list down the road when these consoles drop. Were talking seconds here for loading, but I was gonna do some back n forth stuff.If they had used a TLC SSD instead of QLC it probably would have been pretty similar.
QLC has a hard drop off on write speeds once their SLC cache fills up.
I just really want some confirmation that loading is equal or faster on BC game as it is on XSX.well that was very informative, it confirms my decision to just stick with the external SSD I had been using for my One X for BC on the Series X
I'll make do with the internal SSD for next-gen games until the proprietary expansion SSD drops in price
edit: I'm looking forward to tests like this for the PS5 since it's internal is going to be so much faster, I wonder if that'll make more of a difference with BC games?
Yeah I remember reading that the QVO is notorious for that. Wonder if someone is going to do any extensive list down the road when these consoles drop. Were talking seconds here for loading, but I was gonna do some back n forth stuff.
I just really want some confirmation that loading is equal or faster on BC game as it is on XSX.
I want to assume so, but you never really know until confirmed. Will be sorely disappointed if gains aren't nearly as good.
Grab a TLC drive in that case. Ones with DRAM are best like the WD Blue.
Yes, good value and goes up to 4TB but that one sold is on a different link for some reason:
A reminder, Prime days are coming up next week and then I'd imagine there will be sales around Thanksgiving even outside US.Yes, good value and goes up to 4TB but that one sold is on a different link for some reason:
Also, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD is essentially the same (WD bought Sandisk a while back) but with DDR3 DRAM.
So I'd get whichever is cheaper at a given moment.
Yup, I'm keeping my eyes open for 4TB for XBOX, and dare I say it.... an 8TB QVO for PS5.A reminder, Prime days are coming up next week and then I'd imagine there will be sales around Thanksgiving even outside US.
Yes, good value and goes up to 4TB but that one sold is on a different link for some reason:
Also, the Sandisk Ultra 3D SSD is essentially the same (WD bought Sandisk a while back) but with DDR3 DRAM.
So I'd get whichever is cheaper at a given moment.
External SATA SSD definitely seems best price / performance for running back compat games.
One would need the disc version of AC Unity to try and run it at 60 FPS right? I feel like I remember the patched version running at 30 FPS. Am I remembering this right?
NVME pricing is very close to SATA for the less expensive drives... which are still going to be much faster vs SATA SSDs. External enclosure cost is also not that far off anymore. Mind you, this is for 1TB - 2TB drives.Yeah. The externanl NVMe is faster, but that money is better spent expanding the internal storage via the official expansion card, or in the case of PS5, getting a compliant internal PCI-e NVMe.
In the video this thread is about there is a short clip of Unity running at 60.One would need the disc version of AC Unity to try and run it at 60 FPS right? I feel like I remember the patched version running at 30 FPS. Am I remembering this right?
In the video this thread is about there is a short clip of Unity running at 60.
Exactly what the post I replied to was talking about.It's the unpatched disc version. They also tested it back when the Xbox One X came out.
Considering Rich worked about a week on this video and Sony just dropped a (rather uninteresting) video out of the blue the other day. I think it makes more sense for Rich to prioritise his work, finish his original video, and then move on to something else. A tear down of the physical console that he does not have his hands on is less interesting then working with a console which no one else has and answering key questions people actually care about. IMO - the tear down video is a lot of self explanatory imagery and does not have a lot of information. But I am also not one to cover such a video anyway.Is Digital Foundry going to cover anything PS5?
Sony just did a PS5 tear down and DF puts up an Xbox video instead. Are these paid videos by Microsoft?
Imagine if Sony was smart enough to give DF the kind of access to the PS5 as MS has with the XSX.Is Digital Foundry going to cover anything PS5?
Sony just did a PS5 tear down and DF puts up an Xbox video instead. Are these paid videos by Microsoft?
This answers a question I posted on the YouTube video's page. That's awesome. I mean, the loading times in Forza Horizon 4 generally aren't that bad outside of initially loading into the game from the title screen and coming out of events and/or changing seasons, as the presentation going into a race masks the loading times. That said, it'll be interesting to see how much more quickly the game loads. I was going to put it on the internal storage, anyway, since I still play it so much.Games receiving a Series X patch:
Become "Series X games" for all intents and purposes and will need to run from the internal NVME, and should be taking advantage of velocity architecture, resulting in even faster load times (possibly MUCH faster) and may get other enhancements.
Forza Horizon 4 should have graphics settings beyond PC Ultra while running in 4k60
Gears 5 is receiving a similar upgrade and a 120fps mode.
Why not buy an NVMe? The Sabrent Rocket Q is pretty much the same price as both of those.People looking for quality budget SATA SSDs should take a look at Crucial Mx500 and Seagate Barracuda 120. Wait for prime day.
They talked about the tear down during the 1 million subscriber stream.Is Digital Foundry going to cover anything PS5?
Sony just did a PS5 tear down and DF puts up an Xbox video instead. Are these paid videos by Microsoft?
Considering Rich worked about a week on this video and Sony just dropped a (rather uninformative) video out of the blue the other day. I think it makes more sense for Rich to prioritise his work, finish his original video, and then move on to something else. A tear down of the physical console that he does not have his hands on is less interesting then working with a console which no one else has and answering key questions people actually care about.
Yeap, there are multiple NVME drives very close in price to SATA SSDs. Unless you are going to 4TB (or higher :P), there is no reason to go for SATA in general.Why not buy an NVMe? The Sabrent Rocket Q is pretty much the same price as both of those.