Where did anyone claim anything like that? Feel free to find such claims in all I've said.
You replied to my post where I was criticising people for being "disappointed" with the graphics that DF said was very comparable to PC in practical terms by first claiming they didn't mean that (which they did), then by claiming it's obvious from the video they pointed out. So, no, technically you didn'y say you were disappointed it didn't run in 120hz, yeah, but I think you get what I mean.
And yes, it is disappointing that the consoles which launched less than half a year ago can't handle PC level of graphics from 2019, even in 1440p. This doesn't bode well for the future of this console generation. Without RT it would be a dud on arrival though so at least there's that.
The appropriate response here, I believe is: JFC.
We also saw the introduction of Pro/XBX which kinda made these impressive gains possible highlighting the fact that these people were in fact right.
No, the introduction of Pro/Xbox One X allowed for 4K/checkerboarded games on 4K TVs, but you can still play games like GoW, Uncharted, Horizon, Ghost of Tsushima on base PS4 and I think these games have some of the best graphics you can find in all of current gaming. Heck, I'd say that The Last of Us Part 2, perfectly playable on base PS4, seven years after the console launch (!) - and I'd say it still hasn't been matched by anything PC, graphically speaking. I'd also argue that Gears 5 looks great on Xbox One - sure, not at PC resolutions and framerates, but still looks and runs great. And these are consoles that had performance issues when they came out, so - as others have said - next gen consoles will be fine, graphics-wise. In fact, I'd bet the prettiest, more graphically fascinating game in the next 5-7 years will be on PS5 or Xbox Series X, not on other platforms.
So, TLDR, no, those people in fact were not right.