It sounds like they REALLY didn't need to include the pictures they did, though.
Seems this author did these kind of articles before, just not as fucked up as this shit.
Kotaku going after the VICE audience I see.Looking at the previous articles for this author, I see a pattern:
Looking at the previous articles for this author, I see a pattern:
Looking at the previous articles for this author, I see a pattern:
Just cause he posts here doesn't mean he has to answer for everything that happens on that site.
Looking at the previous articles for this author, I see a pattern:
They...do seem to be perpetually horny. But this particular article definitely sounds like it crossed a line. I'll be a little surprised if they aren't let go.
YeeshLooking at the previous articles for this author, I see a pattern:
And Shota, the second image.So uh.... anyone want to tell jschreier that the site he writes for literally just posted loli porn ( a quick jab at him thinking dragon's crown witch was loli) and by the way incase you (people reading here) dont know. Loli is underaged girls.... and yeah thats drawn/cg kid porn on kotaku
Like, its literal child porn. This shit is illegal in the UK. And the author is also british.
What the FUCK
it's my worst quality!
Dead.gif
You win.
Too late, I'm actually being arraigned as I post this.