100% correct, it sucks that Sony is pandering to the type of gamers that will never have families.
100% correct, it sucks that Sony is pandering to the type of gamers that will never have families.
I know right?, honestly I think the reason Sony is steadfast in their position is because they know that the amount of people who really care about cross platform play is rather miniscule (I couldn't care less for starters).
People in here defending Sony... amazing. And you're doing this for free!
And its always the same ppl arguing in bad faith, being disingenuous.
This is just part of the usual boom/bust cycle of the console market. You see it all the time. The market leader gets arrogant and starts to make bad moves which their competition capitalise on, they then become the market leaders and start acting like dickheads and the cycle starts again. Whoever did the sonic cycle should make a new meme to cover this.
you're only as good as your last product, really. no reason why sony who was at the forefront now has to be slacking compared to the competition.This too. The ride from last gen to this gen has been hilarious. I literal roller coaster.
Last gen: no one really cares about crossplay, Sony was very much at the forefront with it. MS against it.
This gen: MS decides they care now, does it better, now its fuck Sony...
Absolutely hilarious.
This too. The ride from last gen to this gen has been hilarious. I literal roller coaster.
Last gen: no one really cares about crossplay, Sony was very much at the forefront with it. MS against it.
This gen: MS decides they care now, does it better, now its fuck Sony...
Absolutely hilarious.
exactly. around half of this thread only makes sense if you assume it's coming from sony shareholders and board members, those posts make zero sense coming from the actual video game audience.It seems like many people are far more concerned with what's fair treatment of Sony on this topic considering others' history of cross play, rather than realising that that shit shouldn't matter to you as a consumer.
It's what Sony are doing right now that should bother you.
lso, families like to play together. One thing we've seen with games like Vainglory and Fortnite is that a whole family may want to play together, but nobody owns four PlayStations. Dad's going to play on the iPad, one kid is on the PS4, another kid is on his phone. That kind of gameplay is only possible through crossplay.
Most households don't even have multiple consoles at all so his point doesn't make much sense. How many households have four different platforms that they all play at the same time?
Quoting for truth. Cross play is incredibly convenient, and if you for some reason are against it then you're either a fan boy or you don't have kids, and it really is that simple. It's good for everyone and it should be the standard.Crossplay enabled should be the default state of every game on every platform. It's 2019, people play on various platforms and there are no technical hurdles to stop them from playing together. Crossplay would be great for gamers, developers, publishers and most platform holders, with the only exception being whichever company is in the lead. The rest of the industry and gamers themselves should rally under the common cause of making crossplay the de facto standard and keep the pressure on until it happens. Once it is established, no company will be able to lock it down ever again.
Yes, there is a ton of examples.
Sony gets 30% of their revenue from games, DLC and IAP sold on PlayStation, like in all the other games. If competitors have crossplay and they don't, it gives some extra value to their competitors but looking at sales seems that this value is basically zero.I like how in case of cross-play we have to consider Sonys financial gain before complaining, but in case of publishers making games EGS-exclusive the same argument is being shat on.
the moment the main goal of games became graphics, that day local co-op /vs died, due to the inability of the machines to be able to render multiple screens at the same time...
from a pure financial perspective from Sony (Or Microsoft or Nintendo, but specially on Sony as "market leader" AKA most consoles sold so far), XPlay have absolutely no value for em.I like how in case of cross-play we have to consider Sonys financial gain before complaining
Well Sony has made their stance pretty clear I think.
The think that not allowing crossplay will make them more money, so they dont.
Capitalism at work baby.
Well at least he could use a less stupid example. It's the first I heard about 4 different platforms for family. Not to saying he is wrong about this matter but Jeesh.
I dont really like capitalism a whole lot
Sony gets 30% of their revenue from games, DLC and IAP sold on PlayStation, like in all the other games. If competitors have crossplay and they don't, it gives some extra value to their competitors but looking at sales seems that this value is basically zero.
hell ya get that sony klout
It can also bite em hard back.Well Sony has made their stance pretty clear I think.
The think that not allowing crossplay will make them more money, so they dont.
Capitalism at work baby.
Im sure they are aware of all of this. They just think its worth it for now. Its a matter of time before they allow it.It can also bite em hard back.
The current model both M and S work (envision) their consoles is a "the water cooler". a hot spot/ hub for everyone in a designated space to gather together around it.
but with the dead of local MP yet the increase on MP overal (GaaS, BR, pick your poison). the "1 machine to rule em all" model no longer works cause everyone wants to play but not everyone can at the same time. and current machines there is little gain to own 3-4 PS4/ Xbox in the same house. while its more possible to own 1 of each device diversified (PC, table, smartphone, PS4, Xbox, Switch)
So lets say we roll into next gen. everyone but sony addopted Crossplay, and multiplayer games still on the rise. Sony being the "one console you are LOCKED OUT" from playing with everyone (or defect being "only" with PC/ Mobile and not Xbox or Nintendo) will be a huge minus for most people.
Is there any barriers created by Sony for developers to include PC-PS4 crossplay right now? Not that I'm aware of. Not every game supports it cuz not every developer want it, or makes it a priority. Sony, as far as I know, didn't want crossplay and cross progression with another consoles. This was somewhat resolved for the most high profile crossplay games, wasn't resolved for some other games, but it has nothing to do with PC or mobile.Even as a PlayStation fan, I can't defend lack of cross play at this point, won't go well if the PS5 announcement keeps the current, 'selective' crossbuy policy. My friends don't all have PS4 it would be nice to have more games to play with, though to be honest it's mostly PC i want to play with and devs just don't support that too often. Part of me does fear MS leveraging this to take the lead, then dropping the policy as soon as they can.
Is there any barriers created by Sony for developers to include PC-PS4 crossplay right now? Not that I'm aware of. Not every game supports it cuz not every developer want it, or makes it a priority. Sony, as far as I know, didn't want crossplay and cross progression with another consoles. This was somewhat resolved for the most high profile crossplay games, wasn't resolved for some other games, but it has nothing to do with PC or mobile.
You realize Respawn has said they haven't implemented cross play on their end, right? If it were Sony, there's no reason it wouldn't already be implemented for Xbox/PC.The fact that Apex isn't cross play is wild to me. Our group is mostly playing on PC but whenever we're only two available and want to find a third player amongst our friends it's always "sorry I'm playing on PS4/XBO".
So yeah fuck Sony for being incredibly backward and out of touch with this. They're ruining the healthiness of multiplayer games under the guise of children protection my ass.
there's literally no reason to defend this practice. you're not even getting paid to defend this garbage.
i don't think there's any confusion. unless their game is super big, they're not getting cross play. which is just ridiculous cuz smaller games benefit the most from cross play, as they get to pool their userbase together to give their online modes more longevity.I'd argue their current stance is actually worse as it creates confusion for devs (as evidenced by multiple dev accounts so far)