True, but there are some shitty ass democrats out there too. If its a razor thing election like last time, that could cost him (and the whole fucking country).I think the voters who that would matter to are mostly already republicans tho
True, but there are some shitty ass democrats out there too. If its a razor thing election like last time, that could cost him (and the whole fucking country).I think the voters who that would matter to are mostly already republicans tho
Nominate a man hated by the core base of the Democratic Party. See what happens.
Why?
What can trump attack him on?
Pete is starting to look like a very viable candidate.
I still don't get why Buttigieg is a thing.
He's the mayor of a small college town for fucks sake.
What am I missing.
Bloomberg could've been the mayor of midtown Manhattan only and it'd be 100x more impressive.
Age aside I'm supposed to be his demo and I don't get it.
Warrens is almost certainly out after NH, Biden by all accounts is struggling in finances for his campaign. Pete isn't a lock by any means but his path to the nomination has drastically improved. He can absolutely win this.I don't know why everyone is suddenly proclaiming pete as some unstoppable force now, he barely won Iowa, a state where he put the vast majority of his resourses. Honeslty, warren is pulling some of Sander's support and Biden is pulling some of Pete's, but I wouldnt be surprised to see pete on the very bottom of the 4 come the end of the election.
I think being gay is more popular than being socialist in this country.What can Trump attack a gay Catholic over? The homophobic campaign rally one-liners practically write themselves.
Talking about primary debateagainst the rambling, incoherent fool in the white house?
because why?
We're going to nominate a man despised by African-Americans, millennials, and Hispanics. Just what we need to drive out turnout. But a 73 year old white boomer thinks he's a nice, young man.
Is it? You don't think Pete in the general would be a massive depressing factor for black voters?
Pete has no relevant support from black voters. Only if that changes will he have a chance.
It won't change.
Pete's not a contender until he can get greater than 0% support among black voters. That probably won't happen. The most interesting Pete-related data point was that he was a lot of people's #2, but again: consider Iowa's demographics and the fact that caucuses are weird.
In any case, the candidates themselves are moving on. We should too. Bernie performed above expectations. Pete also did, because he threaded that needle between: saturating Iowa with ads (a smart play, campaign-wise) and capitalizing on demographics that were favorable to him (i.e., no minorities).
Biden, who has polled strongly nationally among blacks, a key Democratic constituency – had to contend with comparative lack of racial or ethnic diversity among Iowa caucus-goers. Ninety-one percent were white. That said, among the comparatively few nonwhite caucus-goers, Sanders won 43%. His competitors were clumped distantly - Buttigieg, 15% among nonwhites; Biden, 13%; Warren and entrepreneur Andrew Yang, 12% apiece.
I agree that the random British tweeter probably should shut the fuck up about what Americans should do, and how it's incredibly stupid for her to advocate people not vote so that Republicans can maintain their current status quo.
Warrens is almost certainly out after NH, Biden by all accounts is struggling in finances for his campaign. Pete isn't a lock by any means but his path to the nomination has drastically improved. He can absolutely win this.
Absolutely, 1000% not. The middle of this country is full of religious white & black democrats whose tolerance for a homosexual candidate will only go so far. And its exactly there where he needs to win to gain the Presidency. Pennsylvania, Minnesota - states that went red in 16, that do have religious communities in rural areas, who can flip between voting D & R, and often have, and all they need is a reason to stay home on GE day.I think the voters who that would matter to are mostly already republicans tho
His entire resume is being a small time mayor. Like, the attack ads write themselves.Why?
What can trump attack him on?
Pete is starting to look like a very viable candidate.
Do you know who your current President is, and what his resume is?His entire resume is being a small time mayor. Like, the attack ads write themselves.
I think being gay is more popular than being socialist in this country.
Republicans being hypocrites? Say it ain't so. Not to mention that technically Trump's resume in 2020 will include him being President for 4 years.Do you know who your current President is, and what his resume is?
Well, let me turn that around.I'm happy to see that Bernie has such passionate support but the most terrifying outcome of this whole thing is him being the nominee. Have we ever had a far-left presidential candidate actually be viable and win over independents/moderate conservatives? Far right has proved to be electable in this country but not necessarily the other side.
Between a healthy economy and the "socialism" boogyman in this country, I fear another Trump term >_<
A democrat is not the status quo right now even if it's not enough of a change.
More from the Granite State
Biden and Warren might not even hit viability
Why the fuck is Tulsi at 6%
I'm happy to see that Bernie has such passionate support but the most terrifying outcome of this whole thing is him being the nominee. Have we ever had a far-left presidential candidate actually be viable and win over independents/moderate conservatives? Far right has proved to be electable in this country but not necessarily the other side.
Between a healthy economy and the "socialism" boogyman in this country, I fear another Trump term >_<
unironically, even having been through the iowa shit, if there is one particular thing I wish would fucking stop it's people treating releases of data/polls/etc like it's fucking christmas
YOU'VE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS
IN SIXTEEN YEARS, NOTHING HAS EVER BEEN THE SAME
TUNE IN LIVE AT ELEVEN TO FIND OUT MORE
what the fuck is wrong with these people, and by "these people" I mean "everyone"
More from the Granite State
Biden and Warren might not even hit viability
Why the fuck is Tulsi at 6%
What's the over-under on them just not releasing anything further and hoping people kinda forget about it?
You understand that it's not 2016 right?Actually many of them are. They present no progress. I don't give a shit if they are more progressive that Obama or Clinton. That shit has not been working.
This is incredibly dumb.Actually many of them are. They present no progress. I don't give a shit if they are more progressive that Obama or Clinton. That shit has not been working.
The problem with this logic is that news channels will still want views even if they weren't after profit motive. If hyperbole gets more people to actually seek information, then hyperbole will be used to get their attention.Capitalism demands that you get the most eyes on your website/TV channel/newspaper lest you lose as dollars. And exaggeration, hyperbole, and general clickbait horse race bullshit gets those views.
Capitalism straight up poisons democracy.
lol well i mean trump being elected in the first place was the death knell for manyRepublicans being hypocrites? Say it ain't so. Not to mention that technically Trump's resume in 2020 will include him being President for 4 years.
Not from Trump - a reality show host, the public had no problem voting his sorry ass in.His entire resume is being a small time mayor. Like, the attack ads write themselves.
This is something that's often brought up as a valid criticism of Buttigieg but at least in Iowa, Pete's share of the minority vote was higher than both Warren and Biden - Bernie took the lion share of it.
I am so goddamned tired of the fight between accelerationists and incrementalists.
Tell me what's feasible now and pitch plausible courses of action for the future.
If I have to tell you why candidates to the left of Obama are better than a fascist white supremacist then idek
If accelerationism worked in America then Trump would be completely 100% fucked for 2020. He isn't so it doesn't. This isn't some complex formula.I am so goddamned tired of the fight between accelerationists and incrementalists.
Tell me what's feasible now and pitch plausible courses of action for the future.
Well, let me turn that around.
If Bernie's the nominee, that just means it's your job (and my job, because Bernie is absolutely not my first choice) to convince persuadable folks he's better than Trump.
To be honest, there is no perfect option.
Barack Obama is not walking through that door.
More from the Granite State
Biden and Warren might not even hit viability
Why the fuck is Tulsi at 6%