It had but they recanvassed it.
Good candidates:
Bernies Sanders
Elizabeth Warren
good enough candidates:
Pete Buttigieg
Joe Biden
Tom Steyer
fuck drop out: everyone else
I keep forgetting Bloomberg is even around considering he's not a factor in the whole Iowa situation. Is he still just only focusing on specific states or something?Contrast to Bloomberg, who's committed to keeping his staff through the summer or the election (depends on the specific state) as he is running an anti-Trump campaign first and a presidential campaign second.
I don't imagine any amount of information I present is going to get you to budge, but the simple fact is if we compare the list of Sanders positions to Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020, you could make a strong argument that Clinton was much closer to Sanders platform than several of the candidates this time around. I'd even argue at this point it's closer than everyone except Warren.
Bernie was always in second place and Biden fell HARD in Iowa, so that makes sense
can't wait for the debate tomorrow, Biden is probably going to have a huge meltdown
As someone who grew up West Virginia poor, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.That graph also misrepresents Clinton's positions in a few ways--she was for keeping the ACA and expanding it, with things such as a public option. The minimum wage is currently what, $7.25? I think any increase over $10 will be a massive gain for the working class, and arguing between $12 and $15 isn't as big of a difference as you claim.
Only super tuesday I think?I keep forgetting Bloomberg is even around considering he's not a factor in the whole Iowa situation. Is he still just only focusing on specific states or something?
Imagine not having Biden under drop the fuck outGood candidates:
Bernies Sanders
Elizabeth Warren
good enough candidates:
Pete Buttigieg
Joe Biden
Tom Steyer
fuck drop out: everyone else
Yeah, seriously. I mean, that is you in your avatar, right?
Yeah and I think they updated the outlook graph for post-Iowa:
This is now the media landscape's picture, just so all of us are on the same page.
#noConspiracies:
Is Yang popular on Twitter or social media? Funnily enough the most I ever see him referred to is here, usually in jest.
That graph also misrepresents Clinton's positions in a few ways--she was for keeping the ACA and expanding it, with things such as a public option. The minimum wage is currently what, $7.25? I think any increase over $10 will be a massive gain for the working class, and arguing between $12 and $15 isn't as big of a difference as you claim. The college debate is different approaches to the same thing--Sanders plan is undeniably more ambitious, but Clinton's plan for free community college and vocational training would likely have a similar effect for much cheaper. The Weed thing is a difference, but Sanders actually adapted the idea of rescheduling Marijuana from the Clinton campaign--it's on his Day 1 Executive Orders list. That basically just leaves us with "War" and Glass-Steagall, which was an actual difference through and through. I don't imagine any amount of information I present is going to get you to budge, but the simple fact is if we compare the list of Sanders positions to Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020, you could make a strong argument that Clinton was much closer to Sanders platform than several of the candidates this time around. I'd even argue at this point it's closer than everyone except Warren.
Hardcore Yang supporters live in a bubble. Anyone, even Twitter politic people, has known he's a fringe candidate.Is Yang popular on Twitter or social media? Funnily enough the most I ever see him referred to is here, usually in jest.
how did Buttigieg's odds go down?Yeah and I think they updated the outlook graph for post-Iowa:
Yeah and I think they updated the outlook graph for post-Iowa:
He had a dedicated online presence.Is Yang popular on Twitter or social media? Funnily enough the most I ever see him referred to is here, usually in jest.
i was told that rose twitter and the online leftists were a bubble but they just won Iowa so *shrugs*
I've only ever seen Yang supporters when they bug me at the mall or a 5k I was doingIs Yang popular on Twitter or social media? Funnily enough the most I ever see him referred to is here, usually in jest.
Is Yang popular on Twitter or social media? Funnily enough the most I ever see him referred to is here, usually in jest.
Ironically the reason I started believing in Sanders was seeing how diverse and big his coalition is on Twitter.i was told that rose twitter and the online leftists were a bubble but they just won Iowa so *shrugs*
Sorted alphabetically by last name but keep fucking that chickenPete's face front and center, Bernie stuck awkwardly in the corner.
Thank you CNN, very cool.
Yeah and I think they updated the outlook graph for post-Iowa:
They're alphabetical by last name going left to right, top to bottom....Pete's face front and center, Bernie stuck awkwardly in the corner.
Thank you CNN, very cool.
If your bubble gets you Iowa despite being away due to the impeachment trial then...thats a pretty big bubbleIronically the reason I started believing in Sanders was seeing how diverse and big his coalition is on Twitter.
I don't think being a prohibitive favorite in polling winning says anything about a bubble one way or another?i was told that rose twitter and the online leftists were a bubble but they just won Iowa so *shrugs*
sounds uncomfortable
I'm agreeing with you and that even if you list policies side by side, there's much more to candidates than that. HRC is not left wing.Did you miss what we are replying to? That apparently in 2016 Hillary and Bernie were virtually identical candidates. That suddenly Hilary is a far left candidate and not a centrist?
As someone who grew up West Virginia poor, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
The difference in $240 a paycheck is massive when you're worrying about keeping the gas and lights on during the winter. How you're going to eat. Getting to and from work. Seeking medical attention, etc.
Damn, this was hilarious and I didn't know how badly I needed a laugh until just now.I decided to drive out to Iowa to get to the bottom of this, but you wouldn't believe what I found when I got there... nothing! Just a huge empty parking lot for miles and miles. I only saw one person: an old woman pushing a shopping cart full of corn. I had to practically beg her to talk to me.
I said "Miss, please, can you help me find Iowa?" Do you know what she said?
She said "Iowa? Why, there hasn't been any Iowa out here in over thirty years."
Just what kind of con are they running?? How deep does it go??
Definitely, but Bernie would spend all four years still giving poor Steyer the cold shoulder.Bernie would pick Steyer over blooms if he picked a billionaire as running mate.
whoever called Perez wanting the recount due to satellite SDEs, come collect your prize
Guy better not pop a blood vessel or it's over. Is Bloomberg's attendance confirmed?can't wait for the debate tomorrow, Biden is probably going to have a huge meltdown
Lmao, I'm not even gonna bother editing that, I can't type.
Wait ... jesus christ. Punishing people for not getting shitty health insurance. How is it that we keep coming up with policies that both fail to address the issue and then make things worse somehow. This reminds me of the recent California development to block zoning reform or whatever it wasButtigieg is like Warren in that he has a lot of detailed plans, but unlike Warren his plans all suck.
HahaProbably because he ran for president of Iowa and not much else.