• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Who's Going to Win South Carolina?

  • Joe Biden

    Votes: 585 39.2%
  • Bernie Sanders

    Votes: 853 57.2%
  • Elizabeth Warren

    Votes: 24 1.6%
  • Pete Buttigieg

    Votes: 7 0.5%
  • THE KLOBBERER

    Votes: 16 1.1%
  • Tom Steyer

    Votes: 6 0.4%

  • Total voters
    1,491
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
Overall, the Bernie Bro issue is largely just a "Twitter won't enforce any of their rules against verified accounts with high follower counts" issue.

And Bernie's base is very young so Bernie attracts angry young men along with other, normal young people.

But Jack Alison, Chapo, Cancel Sam, Matt Bruenig, etc, are generally just psychos who create fairly insane conspiracies out of thin air to harass people off of social media. And they do support Bernie and Twitter won't ban them so it's awkward. The solution is for Twitter to ban them but it won't happen.
 

madstarr12

Member
Jan 25, 2018
2,565
Latino support will probably come down to the age demos that come out. Are they doing exit polls for early voters?
They're gonna do "entrance polls", which is pretty similar, but the poll is taken when they come in. Not sure if they're gonna break it down by age. Tho if patterns persist, Bernie will probably do best with the younger latinos.

But since many voted early, not sure if they're gonna be very accurate, unless the entrance polls include those who caucused early.
 

loquaciousJenny

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,457
Overall, the Bernie Bro issue is largely just a "Twitter won't enforce any of their rules against verified accounts with high follower counts" issue.

And Bernie's base is very young so Bernie attracts angry young men along with other, normal young people.

But Jack Alison, Chapo, Cancel Sam, Matt Bruenig, etc, are generally just psychos who create fairly insane conspiracies out of thin air to harass people off of social media. And they do support Bernie and Twitter won't ban them so it's awkward. The solution is for Twitter to ban them but it won't happen.
Its just "being mean online" though. Not like using the term Bernie bro, now that's some shit
 

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
Journalists focus on that part of their supporters as journalists are constantly on Twitter and there's like 5000 psychopaths on Twitter who send guillotine pictures to journalists all the time. IDK.

You keep using the "5000" number like it is significant or large of a portion of his base. To put it into perspective, the Sanders campaign has received over 5 million individual contributions or donations. Even if all 5000 of these psychopaths on Twitter were part of those donors, it would be .01% of his active base. Guess which part of his base gets thrown into headlines or op-eds 99% of the time?

Quit writing off harassment and doxxing as "being mean online"

Now that is what is incredibly offensive right now

Ah yes, that is the real issue at hand, not our entire Democracy being threatened or anything. Not the countless amounts of people who are dying from not being able to pay their insurance premiums. Not racist transphobic billionaire Republicans buying themselves into the Presidency. It's those damn bros and their doxxing!

Can we at least pretend to discuss this in good faith without random strawmen being thrown about?
 

Damaniel

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
6,535
Portland, OR
Even if all 5,000 of those assholes on Twitter were white males, it would still be dismissive to continue using the "Obama Boys" of this election to dilute the actual support amongst minorities and women that he does have. A niche group of people being mean online is hardly worth the erasure of Bernie's actual base.

I really don't like the term 'Bernie Bro', but his online supporters use the 'but we're not all white dudes!' argument to handwave away the underlying issue - a small but still significant number of Bernie's online supporters are unusually - and arguably uniquely - toxic. You don't see Pete Twitter (or Warren Twitter) doxxing people two or three degrees separated from a non-Pete (or non-Warren) candidate because of a tenuous link to some conspiracy or other, or perpetuating conspiracies about how everyone is out to undermine their campaigns, nor do you see them photoshopping rat faces onto other candidates, or making up arguments about other candidates based on slippery slopes and strawmen (a la the 'Pete's gonna force the poors to go to the military' crap that was making the rounds a while back).

In the end (and fortunately), election battles aren't generally won on Twitter. That doesn't mean that we can't at least acknowledge that some of us (even here!) have different ideas of what makes a good candidate, and that we can all stand to be a little more civil in our interactions with others online.
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
Can we at least pretend to discuss this in good faith without random strawmen being thrown about?

Said the person downplaying online harassment and doxxing.

As if solving healthcare, or getting trump out of office requires any of that against people that *checks notes* disagree with Bernie about how to make that work?

Also we have better things to worry about so harassment and doxxing can be put asside, but we have to address the "Bernie Bro" term?
 

shamanick

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,072
There are plenty of high-follower supporters of other campaigns who have been just as nasty as the worst Bernie Bros. The difference is in the David Brock branding.
 

loquaciousJenny

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,457
User Banned (2 Weeks): Hostility; Prior Bans for Hostility
You keep using the "5000" number like it is significant or large of a portion of his base. To put it into perspective, the Sanders campaign has received over 5 million individual contributions or donations. Even if all 5000 of these psychopaths on Twitter were part of those donors, it would be .01% of his active base. Guess which part of his base gets thrown into headlines or op-eds 99% of the time?



Ah yes, that is the real issue at hand, not our entire Democracy being threatened or anything. Not the countless amounts of people who are dying from not being able to pay their insurance premiums. Not racist transphobic billionaire Republicans buying themselves into the Presidency. It's those damn bros and their doxxing!

Can we at least pretend to discuss this in good faith without random strawmen being thrown about?
Oh fuck off with your dismissive bullshit, you're in here whining about the term Bernie bro and you have the gall to then go up to me and say "aren't there more important things to worry about"
 
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
There are plenty of high-follower supporters of other campaigns who have been just as nasty as the worst Bernie Bros. The difference is in the David Brock branding.

Bernie Stans harassed a Nigerian man and a Nevada voting rights lawyer off social media based on totally insane conspiracies that they were agents of the Buttigieg campaign, out to rig Nevada for him or were sockpuppet accounts of his campaign.

It just hasn't been a good week for the Bernie Stans.

Have to say that the entire Iowa thing as well was incredibly embarrassing also. The app failing hugely hurt Buttigieg and yet the entire internet claimed the app was a conspiracy by Buttigieg to rig the Iowa caucus. It's an article of faith among Bernie fans online that Pete somehow rigged the Iowa caucus and that's a little disturbing.
 

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
Oh fuck off with your dismissive bullshit, you're in here whining about the term Bernie bro and you have the gall to then go up to me and say "aren't there more important things to worry about"

The most dismissive thing about this discussion is pretending that the Bernie Bro narrative doesn't exist to negatively affect the campaign of someone who genuinely wants to help the working class of America as opposed to a bunch of rich folk like usual. I don't think it's a good thing to harass people online, but that doesn't mean said harassment from an iota of Sanders supporters is even close to representative of his base, and treating it as such is dangerous and disingenuous.
 

Volimar

volunteer forum janitor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,346
Ah yes, that is the real issue at hand, not our entire Democracy being threatened or anything. Not the countless amounts of people who are dying from not being able to pay their insurance premiums. Not racist transphobic billionaire Republicans buying themselves into the Presidency. It's those damn bros and their doxxing!


I agreed with you up to this. This is a disturbing trend that nothing matters as long as we have The Cause. The amount of things that are increasingly treated as if they don't matter because we have to get Sanders elected is worrying.
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
The most dismissive thing about this discussion is pretending that the Bernie Bro narrative doesn't exist to negatively affect the campaign of someone who genuinely wants to help the working class of America as opposed to a bunch of rich folk like usual. I don't think it's a good thing to harass people online, but that doesn't mean said harassment from an iota of Sanders supporters is even close to representative of his base, and treating it as such is dangerous and disingenuous.

"harassment is bad BUT"

Let me stop you right there.

Funny how every other candidates' supporters get painted with wide-brush and insulted, but addressing the very vocal and public harassment out of the section of Vocal Bernie supporters is an outrageous attack.
 

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
I agreed with you up to this. This is a disturbing trend that nothing matters as long as we have The Cause. The amount of things that are increasingly treated as if they don't matter because we have to get Sanders elected is worrying.

Those things matter obviously, but not nearly (not even close) to how important actual physical issues surrounding most Americans are. The majority of the working class doesn't give a fuck about Twitter, they just want to be able to pay their rent and see a doctor without going bankrupt. His campaign isn't even about getting Sanders elected, it's about the working class finally having representation at that level.

"harassment is bad BUT"

Let me stop you right there.

You know exactly what you're doing if you genuinely believe I'm okay with harassment. Knock it off.
 
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
The most dismissive thing about this discussion is pretending that the Bernie Bro narrative doesn't exist to negatively affect the campaign of someone who genuinely wants to help the working class of America as opposed to a bunch of rich folk like usual. I don't think it's a good thing to harass people online, but that doesn't mean said harassment from an iota of Sanders supporters is even close to representative of his base, and treating it as such is dangerous and disingenuous.

I do not think anything we're doing in this thread or online will have any impact at all on the election. Some people think they can influence internet etiquette more by posting on Era than they can convince swing voters by posting on Era. And they're probably right as everyone here is in the 95th+ percentile of left leaning in the United States.
 

uncelestial

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,060
San Francisco, CA, USA
"harassment is bad BUT"

Let me stop you right there.
No, I don't think you get to do that. If you actually see someone justifying or defending harassment or doxxing, but all means show receipts and you have my sword, but you don't get to tell people to stop talking about other things because of what appears like a horrible faction of online trolls who aren't representative of the millions of people who support a candidate. He's already condemned the behavior and said they aren't part of the movement; since he is not literally in control of everyone's actions, I'm not sure what else you're looking for. I mean in all honesty, what do you expect him or any of us to do? It's horrible, we condemn it. Yes.
 

Tukarrs

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,814
So I have someone very close to me that has always voted independent, but grew up in a very conservative household. One where their dad is still a republican and blindly supports trump. However, because of that, they grew up around people that beat the idea that "OMG SOCIALISM IS BAD" into their heads that they will not support Bernie.

When we get into conversations about it, I avoid it, one because it just infuriates me, and two because I dont really know what I can say to change their mind. They have been trying to find a different dem candidate to support, and they are leaning towards the most moderate one (Pete). Which is ironic because their #1 candidate was Yang and I would bet that Bernie is far more like Yang than Pete is.

Any tips on what to say to combat the typical "socialism is bad" and "do you want our healthcare system to become like the DMV"? I tell them that is all false bullshit and no other country with free healthcare actually operates like that. But it doesnt seem to work. Is it a lost cause or do you guys have any tips?

Ask if it's right that billionaires and their corporations pay much less taxes than regular folks. How the Republicans and GOP are focused on cutting food stamps when they're a fraction of the cost of military increases. (60 Billion per year) Socialism for the rich has been on steroids for the last few decades.

Also DMVs are also not uniformly bad. It heavily depends on the state, and is largely dependent on how well they fund it.
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
No, I don't think you get to do that. If you actually see someone justifying or defending harassment or doxxing, but all means show receipts and you have my sword, but you don't get to tell people to stop talking about other things for what appears like a horrible faction of online trolls who aren't representative of the millions of people who support a candidate.

Then you folks need to stop defending and making excuses for them.

Or trying to make some false equivlencey with the harassment and Doxxing as a reaction to the term Bernie Bro.

Funny how, that didnt stop Bernie Supporters here from Labeling supporters from every other candidate and none of them decided to defend harassment as a proper 'counter measure'
 

Volimar

volunteer forum janitor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,346
Those things matter obviously, but not nearly (not even close) to how important actual physical issues surrounding most Americans are. The majority of the working class doesn't give a fuck about Twitter, they just want to be able to pay their rent and see a doctor without going bankrupt. His campaign isn't even about getting Sanders elected, it's about the working class finally having representation at that level.


That's a very weak excuse. Criticism is important. It's how a candidate, or a president, knows they fucked up and need to do better. I really don't want people in the habit of dismissing fuck ups because it's Our Guy.
 

thoughthaver

Banned
Feb 6, 2020
434
all these campaigns dredging up the bernie bro bullshit tells me that dems have learned literally fucking nothing from 2016. you NEVER win anyone over by going after their supporters. all this is doing is solidifying support for bernie and basically affirming that the establishment hates him and them. its even worse since his support is even more diverse than ever. and its all being done in the service of mike fucking bloomberg. first as a tragedy, then as a farce...
 

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
That's a very weak excuse. Criticism is important. It's how a candidate, or a president, knows they fucked up and need to do better. I really don't want people in the habit of dismissing fuck ups because it's Our Guy.

Please explain to me how the actions of less than .1% of his base indicates that Sanders needs to "do better" as a candidate.
 

BADMAN

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,887
You might be able to make the case on the Liz Smith Nigerian thing, but that was suspicious as hell too if you actually read the receipts on it. But fine, he had to leave twitter due to a misunderstanding.

But the Pete campaign manager one? She left her job with the campaign to work for Nevada Dems voting security team. When she got called out she started covering it up. That's clearly got conflict of interest written all over it. That kind of shit deserves to be called out regardless of intention.
 

Brinbe

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
58,038
Terana
holy shit. bloomberg goin full on class warfare here. YO, THEY ARE FUCKING SCAAAAAARRRRRRRED OF BERNIE HAHAHHA

he's not running to beat trump, he's running to save his taxes. this fucking guyyyyyyyyy
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
Link to the post where I defend harassment, please.

maybe because you aren't the only poster here arguing about this topic? and the poster that did it was literally in the past 2 pages, you could have easily followed the converstion and why people are getting angry about the downplaying of harassment that goes on here just because some of the harassers support a particular candidate.
 

Volimar

volunteer forum janitor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,346
Please explain to me how the actions of less than .1% of his base indicates that Sanders needs to "do better" as a candidate.


That part wasn't referring to the "Bros." but to the trend with treating Bernie's missteps as if they don't matter. It's why I was glad that AOC took Sanders to task for touting his Rogan endorsement.

Edit: For the record, I've said multiple times now that Sanders isn't responsible for the actions of that small percentage of his base.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,215
Isn't it mostly a term used to describe Chapo, Bruenig, and Sirota when they post images of gay rape scenes to troll Pete.

I don't follow the twitter at all, but remember seeing the name Sirota last night as toxic. I didn't see the poster's reply with receipts, but I'm very willing to listen, if a paid member of Bernie's campaign is posting images of rape. Could you source this? My twitter fu is lacking and this guy posts like 10 tweets a minute. A lot to sort through when you never use twitter.
 

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984


Bloomberg shouldn't have a problem finding actually bad tweets so what gives with this milk toast stuff? Or editing posts?
 
Aug 12, 2019
5,159
So I have someone very close to me that has always voted independent, but grew up in a very conservative household. One where their dad is still a republican and blindly supports trump. However, because of that, they grew up around people that beat the idea that "OMG SOCIALISM IS BAD" into their heads that they will not support Bernie.

When we get into conversations about it, I avoid it, one because it just infuriates me, and two because I dont really know what I can say to change their mind. They have been trying to find a different dem candidate to support, and they are leaning towards the most moderate one (Pete). Which is ironic because their #1 candidate was Yang and I would bet that Bernie is far more like Yang than Pete is.

Any tips on what to say to combat the typical "socialism is bad" and "do you want our healthcare system to become like the DMV"? I tell them that is all false bullshit and no other country with free healthcare actually operates like that. But it doesnt seem to work. Is it a lost cause or do you guys have any tips?

Just tell them that the "socialism" that we currently refer to mostly just refers to taking care of people as human being in a democratic country with a strong social safety net that already exists in the forms of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Then bring up the fact that systemic change would force those institutions to be better because then because those systems would be used by everybody and the existing infrastructure will just adapt to the new system. Show them examples of positive healthcare support in other countries and if you can, show them how shocked internationals are at the concept of being left to die in the richest country in the world.

I've had some success with pushing the idea that if America is the greatest country in the world (making the play for that emotional instinct that tends to lie dormantly in these people), than there's absolutely no reason America can't do a truly public medicare for all solution better than those other countries.

I mean there's lot of nuance to any situation of that type, but it's coming at them with thoughts about bettering the world and trying to use as much evidence in a way that resonates with them without you coming off elitist. And most importantly, just listening to them and trying to address their individual points and criticisms is the really hard part that requires a great deal of investment from you that you can then use to discuss your perspective and address those specific issues.

But also, feel free to point out how awesome things like libraries, post offices, fire stations, and roads are as well as not being shy in pointing out how much safety nets helped America too. It's a process, but everything can help and you just have to keep trying without overstepping the boundary of "annoyance" in regards to the topic.
 

Sixfortyfive

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
4,615
Atlanta
Jack Alison, David Klion, White Assad, Garbage Ape, etc yesterday harassed a Nigerian man off Twitter, claiming he was a burner account of Buttigieg's campaign manager. Today, they are claiming that all liberal and socialist reporters who claim to have talked to him are liars who are paid off by Pete.
We're talking about that same Twitter user that tweeted out "It's Liz," right? Are you saying that was a photoshop or something?
 

julian

Member
Oct 27, 2017
16,757
Oh my goodness. So many responses to my question! I wasn't sure who the former Clinton aide was, but I was also pointing out it's bad form to just post a tweet and assume everybody knows who that is.
 

lowmelody

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,101
I'm done hearing from anyone that uses or defends the use of 'benie bros' and all the brow beating that comes with it.
 
Oct 26, 2017
20,440
I'm done hearing from anyone that uses or defends the use of 'benie bros' and all the brow beating that comes with it.

Okay cool. Just be willing say "no the app did not help Pete Buttigieg at all" when people say Pete rigged the Iowa caucus by paying a Dem company that made the app.

It's just weird to see it online. Because it's very false and yet very common.
 

Tukarrs

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,814
I don't follow the twitter at all, but remember seeing the name Sirota last night as toxic. I didn't see the poster's reply with receipts, but I'm very willing to listen, if a paid member of Bernie's campaign is posting images of rape. Could you source this? My twitter fu is lacking and this guy posts like 10 tweets a minute. A lot to sort through when you never use twitter.
It's Virgil Texas posting an image from the movie Salò of a man being tortured with a caption 'At the Buttigieg staff party in Concord, the mood is not happy'.
It plays into the idea/joke that Pete Buttigieg is a psychopath who takes out his frustration on dogs and has now moved onto his campaign staff. People who do not know that recurring theme thinks the person being tortured is supposed to be Pete.

I haven't seen the film so I might have some details wrong.

twitter.com

Virgil Texas on Twitter

“At the Buttigieg staff party in Concord, the mood is not happy”

He is a Chapo Trap House host and not a paid member of the campaign. He is a vocal supporter and close to the campaign though.
 
Oct 25, 2017
271
User Banned (Permanent): Inflammatory Trolling; Prior Bans for Trolling and Dismissing Bigotry; Account in Junior Phase
Candidates like Warren don't have angry fans online cause all she has is boring ass cis gay men and wine moms
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
Okay cool. Just be willing say "no the app did not help Pete Buttigieg at all" when people say Pete rigged the Iowa caucus by paying a Dem company that made the app.

It's just weird to see it online. Because it's very false and yet very common.
So you want this person to condemn something you saw online because they said that they reject the Bernie bro's narrative here?
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,351
Chuck Todd is moderating the debate. We're spending at least half of it talking about Bernie Bros.
Clockwork71.jpg
 

shamanick

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,072
Not sure about what the truth is but the suspicion started because an account that tweeted exclusively about bitcoin and selling sockpuppet accounts became a very prolific Buttigieg supporter account overnight
 
Status
Not open for further replies.