So we should just give him what he wants?Won't him running a third party spite campaign sabotage the election just as much as him becoming the Democratic nominee?
So we should just give him what he wants?Won't him running a third party spite campaign sabotage the election just as much as him becoming the Democratic nominee?
Yes, seeing as how the sabotaging is underway, they have a clear sight of the dissidence the left side of their party is causing, they should already be moving away from him with some boilerplate speech. I mean for god sake, we pretty much forced Al Franken to step down on allegations of sexual harassment in short order. Back then (like what 2 years ago?) we'd have never even floated the idea of running somebody like Bloomer. WTF happened? (rhetorical I guess, money happened)I think the threat he represents to the Party and the future of this country should he sabotage the election justifies this type of response.
I really don't get where you got my desire for civility from that. I don't give a flying fuck about civility. I'm pointing out there are no good options considering the situation. He kind of has them hostage. The only way to beat him is for the candidates themselves to crush his shit in.Glad your desire for civility is more important than a literal oligarch showing every billionaire that they can just buy leadership.
He could still run 3rd party in the general even if he lost in the primary couldn't he?
Doctor's salaries etc will definitely need to be lower but I think Sanders should drop the no copay thing, even a very small amount like Sweden's $5 thing would make people think twice
He could still run 3rd party in the general even if he lost in the primary couldn't he?
Bernard's rally in Tacoma has started.
Looks like a huge turnout.
Technically sure but it'd be an entirely different narrative. If he's beaten and goes 3rd party he looks like a petty loser spoiler. If he's pushed our illegitimately or harshly then he seems more justified to people.He could still run 3rd party in the general even if he lost in the primary couldn't he?
Bernard's rally in Tacoma has started.
Looks like a huge turnout.
Why aren't all primaries done on a single day? Why do we set expectations based on these small states and have people drop out as a result with other states looking to the example set by the smaller ones? I don't get it.
Don't candidates sign a pledge to not do 3rd party in order to run for the primary?He could still run 3rd party in the general even if he lost in the primary couldn't he?
Will Doctor's salaries be lower though?
Remember, Doctors have to hire and pay people specifically to fight with health insurances who are constantly trying to screw over their patients (I have personal horror stories, and I have had "good" insurance for decades) and people who deal with dozens of insurance with varying copays, deductibles and patients who have no idea how the fuck deductibles work.
Those people get paid money. Let's say $40k/year per person. If medicare lowers Doctor's fees somewhat, they will save those 40k.
If people can afford to go to the DR. They will go more often. More patients = more money.
Finally, the vast majority of Doctors get into that career to help people*. The current system we have is a huge bummer for them. Watching people come when it's too late because of money problems is not something they enjoy. They'd rather have everybody be insured and catch disease early. They'd rather have everybody get the necessary medical care, than make 5% more money.
Don't be fooled. The AMA represents a minority of doctors (mostly assholes).
*(Unless you're a dermatologist, surgeon or one of a handful of other very lucrative specialties, you can make more money by going to engineering school for 4 years and putting money early in a 401k than a med student spending virtually all of their 20s getting in debt then getting underpaid while in residency.
Just quickly read up on this. It would be state law to enact that and it relates to ballot access. But most of these laws do not apply to presidential candidates.I thought someone in this thread said there were "sore loser" rules that prohibit someone who lost in primaries from going third party.
I thought someone in this thread said there were "sore loser" rules that prohibit someone who lost in primaries from going third party.
I wasn't sure that's why i asked. I thought there was some rule about that. Like a "sore loser" rule but not sure honestly.Don't candidates sign a pledge to not do 3rd party in order to run for the primary?
I doubt that. The average salary for, say, a family medicine physician is just around $200k/year. FM requires only 3 years of residency. And FM is on the lower end of salaries (IIRC psychiatry is lower). Plus doctors make more money from pharma companies who want them to prescribe their product over the competition.Will Doctor's salaries be lower though?
Remember, Doctors have to hire and pay people specifically to fight with health insurances who are constantly trying to screw over their patients (I have personal horror stories, and I have had "good" insurance for decades) and people who deal with dozens of insurance with varying copays, deductibles and patients who have no idea how the fuck deductibles work.
Those people get paid money. Let's say $40k/year per person. If medicare lowers Doctor's fees somewhat, they will save those 40k.
If people can afford to go to the DR. They will go more often. More patients = more money.
Finally, the vast majority of Doctors get into that career to help people*. The current system we have is a huge bummer for them. Watching people come when it's too late because of money problems is not something they enjoy. They'd rather have everybody be insured and catch disease early. They'd rather have everybody get the necessary medical care, than make 5% more money.
Don't be fooled. The AMA represents a minority of doctors (mostly assholes).
*(Unless you're a dermatologist, surgeon or one of a handful of other very lucrative specialties, you can make more money by going to engineering school for 4 years and putting money early in a 401k than a med student spending virtually all of their 20s getting in debt then getting underpaid while in residency.
In general, I like most of the candidates, which is why I really don't like to shit on them. Well, besides money-bloomz. As far as Tulsi goes, I don't know why she is running. I mean her issue is non-interventialism, but other than that I can't tell you what she believes.
No, it's not. She's a war hawk. She just doesn't like "regime change" wars, but wars for other reasons are perfectly fine.
Are you planning to vote for Trump in the general or have you just not gotten around to changing your party registration lolI'm a Republican but will vote in the Democrat primary in Virginia.(since its an open primary). Plus I think the Virginia Republican primary was cancelled
She fucking brags about her service in the Iraq War. But she says she's anti-war so it must be true!No, it's not. She's a war hawk. She just doesn't like "regime change" wars, but wars for other reasons are perfectly fine.
The longer this goes on the more bizarre her association with Sanders looks
Are you planning to vote for Trump in the general or have you just not gotten around to changing your party registration lol
Depends. If it's Biden or Mayor Pete, I am honestly undecided. If it's Bernie, which seems likely, I will 100% vote Trump.
Although Bernie I think has a decent shot in the general. Makes it two energized bases against each other and it will inevitably become somewhat a battle between capitalism vs socialism. Bloomberg would be a disaster for Democrats in my opinion, although his money has certainly improved his polling numbers among Democrats which is astonishing.
speaking of Virginia I see a few Democrats went against Northam and joined Republicans and voted to shelf the assault weapons ban for a year. Including two Dems from Northern Virginia I believe.
There really couldn't be a more perfect showdown than Bernie vs. Bloomberg. It's a question about what, fundamentally, the Democratic party's base wants for the country.
I'm optimistic, but also just a little bit terrified.
Bruh whatDepends. If it's Biden or Mayor Pete, I am honestly undecided. If it's Bernie, which seems likely, I will 100% vote Trump.
Although Bernie I think has a decent shot in the general. Makes it two energized bases against each other and it will inevitably become somewhat a battle between capitalism vs socialism. Bloomberg would be a disaster for Democrats in my opinion, although his money has certainly improved his polling numbers among Democrats which is astonishing.
speaking of Virginia I see a few Democrats went against Northam and joined Republicans and voted to shelf the assault weapons ban for a year. Including two Dems from Northern Virginia I believe.
Depends. If it's Biden or Mayor Pete, I am honestly undecided. If it's Bernie, which seems likely, I will 100% vote Trump.
What's wrong with socialism?Depends. If it's Biden or Mayor Pete, I am honestly undecided. If it's Bernie, which seems likely, I will 100% vote Trump.
Although Bernie I think has a decent shot in the general. Makes it two energized bases against each other and it will inevitably become somewhat a battle between capitalism vs socialism. Bloomberg would be a disaster for Democrats in my opinion, although his money has certainly improved his polling numbers among Democrats which is astonishing.
speaking of Virginia I see a few Democrats went against Northam and joined Republicans and voted to shelf the assault weapons ban for a year. Including two Dems from Northern Virginia I believe.
Depends. If it's Biden or Mayor Pete, I am honestly undecided. If it's Bernie, which seems likely, I will 100% vote Trump.
Although Bernie I think has a decent shot in the general. Makes it two energized bases against each other and it will inevitably become somewhat a battle between capitalism vs socialism. Bloomberg would be a disaster for Democrats in my opinion, although his money has certainly improved his polling numbers among Democrats which is astonishing.
speaking of Virginia I see a few Democrats went against Northam and joined Republicans and voted to shelf the assault weapons ban for a year. Including two Dems from Northern Virginia I believe.