• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
Bernie vs Biden was a referendum on which voters you wanted in November, the edgy socialists or the moderate suburbanites and the party has collectively decided to go with the moderate suburbanites, which is fine and good, but then being surprised you didn't also get the edgy socialists is a weird complaint. You were never in a position to get both groups and its odd to ever think you were or base your strategy on that.
Pretty much

Put all of this shaming effort into trying to appeal to an even more inscrutable block of voters the party is so enamored with and try to turn some pink centrists baby blue. That was the endgame of the strategy, don't act like you were forced into this choice. The party and the media have been telling the left to fuck off—well forever, but more specifically—for the past year. Now they're fucking off.
 

Madison

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
8,388
Lima, Peru
Famous oppressor Virgil Texas once said about crazy transphobic republicans :

"These are the kind of people you alineate when talking about bathrooms. And good, I want them to be alineated from the mainstream"
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,244
Anyway, I don't really understand why so much time and effort is being expended on this back and forth about socialists voting for Biden or not. We already know that the vast majority of Bernie supporters will still turn out to vote for Biden in the GE, as they did in 2016. And Clinton was much more unpalatable than Biden. I'm honestly not worried about them, and wish this thread would move beyond that already. We're rehashing the same conversation over and over again and it's just tiring.

All I've cared about from the start is that the candidate who would be capable of building a winning coalition would emerge the winner. The results in Nevada were really exciting to me because it seemed like Bernie could be that candidate. It's a shame the rest of the primary didn't play out like that, but it is what it is.
 
Last edited:
Mar 18, 2020
2,434
Just want to say as a black dude, could you leave us out of these slap fights?

Especially the self-proclaimed leftists or "true progressives" who run with people who call black voters "low information" and think we're too stupid to hear the thinly-veiled "niggers" underneath.
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
And find out what? Who votes and who doesn't vote? If it's that hard to vote out Donald fucking Trump, then they probably weren't going to vote anyway. Let's be serious. The GOP lies to its voters and they vote because they believe their lives depend on it. If you want to sit out an election because a candidate doesn't match your viewpoints 100%, go ahead. You want Biden to earn your vote? He's moving leftward, like Clinton did after the 2016 primary. Did I see a whole bunch of "oh man, she's willing to work with us! We're going to be able to actually do something!" Nah, it was just "wow, I can't believe she's pandering." "She's not even a real progressive." "Lol, she's just lying to try to get our vote and she'll never actually pass anything progressive." If you want to be cynical, be cynical. But don't pretend like there's anything Biden can do to actually earn your vote. It's honestly a waste of time. It's exactly that one comic where the Republican is saying to Obama "alright, if you move a little, I'll move a little" only for the Republican to move even further away.
Find out if you need them or not. Bernie's "youth vote" advantage was with age <50 voters.

Love your horseshoe, btw. Antique, but in great condition.
 

Nox

Member
Dec 23, 2017
2,904
I like it when people say stuff like the DNC put Biden there instead of Bernie. Really absolves Bernie from the fact that people didn't vote for him
 

SmokeMaxX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,336
Just remember- it's unacceptable to try to court the suburban moms that carried Democrats to victory in 2018, but by god if you make one peep about how we're giving Joe Rogan a platform then you're not a TRUE progressive. Only we get to decide who we're allowed to try to win the votes of.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
Bernie vs Biden was a referendum on which voters you wanted in November, the edgy socialists or the moderate suburbanites and the party has collectively decided to go with the moderate suburbanites, which is fine and good, but then being surprised you didn't also get the edgy socialists is a weird complaint. You were never in a position to get both groups and its odd to ever think you were or base your strategy on that. I think electorally the moderate suburbanites were probably the strategically superior choice, but a choice was made. You resoundly rejected the socialist cake, going so far as to say the cake didn't exist (a claim borne out by primary performance) so why be upset you don't get to eat from it?
Pretty much

Put all of this shaming effort into trying to appeal to an even more inscrutable block of voters the party is so enamored with and try to turn some pink centrists baby blue. That was the endgame of the strategy, don't act like you were forced into this choice. The party and the media have been telling the left to fuck off—well forever, but more specifically—for the past year. Now they're fucking off.

I don't call myself a socialist but I would have crawled over glass shards to vote for Bernie in the November to stop Trump. Because he is an existential threat to our very way of life.

I would have hoped socialists would see Trump for the monster that he is as well. But instead we see prominent socialists advocating for Trump's re-election to punish Democrats.
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
I would have hoped socialists would see Trump for the monster that he is as well. But instead we see prominent socialists advocating for Trump's re-election to punish Democrats.
Going by the 2016 bernie to clinton numbers, I think you'll find all of this bickering was pointless. It's on biden if he loses, not some podcast hosts
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
It's the voters who soundly reject or embrace a candidate, not the other way around.
And one group of voters rejected the other group of voters and this is the fallout of that rejection. Again you would be delusional to ever think you were getting both groups and that you could get them to combine their electoral powers like the Planeteers.

Although in my mind there was a possibility of getting both camps under a Bernie campaign I did not really think it would be possible under a Biden campaign and baked this calculus into my support for Bernie.

But instead we see prominent socialists advocating for Trump's re-election to punish Democrats.
Okay, see, here is the problem. CTH are not "prominent socialists". Zizek is a "prominent socialist". Chomsky is a "prominent socialist". The CTH guys are comedians doing a novel and disruptive form of political entertainment, like the next evolution of the late night talk show. Thinking that they in any way, shape, or form, represent modern socialism is like saying Colbert leads modern liberalism.

Your obsession with these guys is really wild, they couldn't even get Bernie elected and you're worried that they'll hand November to Trump?
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,244
And one group of voters rejected the other group of voters and this is the fallout of that rejection. Again you would be delusional to ever think you were getting both groups and that you could get them to combine their electoral powers like the Planeteers.

Although in my mind there was a possibility of getting both camps under a Bernie campaign I did not really think it would be possible under a Biden campaign and baked this calculus into my support for Bernie.


Okay see, here is the problem. CTH are not "prominent socialists". Zizek is a "prominent socialist". Chomsky is a "prominent socialist". The CTH guys are comedians doing a novel form of political entertainment, like the next evolution of the late night talk show. Thinking that they in any way, shape, or form, represent modern socialism is like saying Colbert leads modern liberalism.
How did one group of voters reject the other? By not letting their preferred candidate win? Because some subset of one group said something dismissive of the other on Twitter?
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,244
It doesn't matter how many votes they affect, we should call out those who claim to be on the left advocating for Trump's re-election.
I'd rather not humor them. The effect of what they're doing is likely to be negligible. They had negligible influence on the primary, so what sort of impact could they really have on the GE?
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
How did one group of voters reject the other? By not letting their preferred candidate win? Because some subset of one group said something dismissive of the other on Twitter?
Yes, to both questions. At least that's how I see it. The CTH crowd was always going to take the loss of Bernie really personally and the twitter culture war stuff doesn't really help ease tensions there. I figured everyone already knew this already.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,899
Ontario
Just remember- it's unacceptable to try to court the suburban moms that carried Democrats to victory in 2018, but by god if you make one peep about how we're giving Joe Rogan a platform then you're not a TRUE progressive. Only we get to decide who we're allowed to try to win the votes of.
i mean when you're already validating Michael Bloomberg the idea of raising a fuss for someone over accepting the endorsement of a transphobe with affiliations to the far right doesn't seem like it is that important at the end of the day
 

SmokeMaxX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,336
i mean when you're already validating Michael Bloomberg the idea of raising a fuss for someone over accepting the endorsement of a transphobe with affiliations to the far right doesn't seem like it is that important at the end of the day
Yeah, but here's the thing- Biden is the "Unity/compromise" candidate who will accept any help to defeat Trump. That's like literally his brand this election. Sanders is the "pure, never been wrong on the issues" candidate. It's just hypocritical. It's like when evangelical pastors tell you how full of sin you are and then they're caught stealing money from their constituents and sleeping with all the young wives. "Do as I say, not as I do!"
 
Oct 27, 2017
12,979
The party and the media have been telling the left to fuck off—well forever, but more specifically—for the past year. Now they're fucking off.

You're wrong. Nothing wrong with progressive policies. That ain't it.

Core constituents on the left, like black voters Bernie pretended didn't exist, well we ain't got time for racist fauxgressives who are gonna erase our voices and tell us what's good for us.

Just want to say as a black dude, could you leave us out of these slap fights?

Especially the self-proclaimed leftists or "true progressives" who run with people who call black voters "low information" and think we're too stupid to hear the thinly-veiled "niggers" underneath.

This. Fucking all of this.

The privilege makes me sick. They show their asses quick too when they threaten us with not voting and keeping Trump in office.
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
2,899
Ontario
Yeah, but here's the thing- Biden is the "Unity/compromise" candidate who will accept any help to defeat Trump. That's like literally his brand this election. Sanders is the "pure, never been wrong on the issues" candidate. It's just hypocritical. It's like when evangelical pastors tell you how full of sin you are and then they're caught stealing money from their constituents and sleeping with all the young wives. "Do as I say, not as I do!"
that sounds like a narrative that you've created for yourself based on how you view his inflexibility

if Bernie won the nomination would eventually have to compromise in terms of who he was reaching out to.

Excusing Joe for his choices while chiding Bernie seems not to be fair at all. That's kind of a flimsy reason to hold a double standard
 

SmokeMaxX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,336
that sounds like a narrative that you've created for yourself based on how you view his inflexibility

if Bernie won the nomination would eventually have to compromise in terms of who he was reaching out to.

Excusing Joe for his choices while chiding Bernie seems not to be fair at all. That's kind of a flimsy reason to hold a double standard
This is just a bizarre argument. If you were to ask all Bernie supporters (or hell, all voters period) which candidate is the compromise candidate and which one ran on sticking to his guns (pun unintended), you think it'd even be close? I'm creating my own narrative? Lmao. You can't be serious. That's exactly what leftists claim to hate about Biden and what they love about Sanders. They hate that Biden is willing to compromise on his positions and many don't believe Sanders would.
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,244
that sounds like a narrative that you've created for yourself based on how you view his inflexibility

if Bernie won the nomination would eventually have to compromise in terms of who he was reaching out to.

Excusing Joe for his choices while chiding Bernie seems not to be fair at all. That's kind of a flimsy reason to hold a double standard
You and I understand that Bernie would've had to compromise on his ideals eventually, but do the most ardent of his supporters realize that?
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,899
Ontario
This is just a bizarre argument. If you were to ask all Bernie supporters (or hell, all voters period) which candidate is the compromise candidate and which one ran on sticking to his guns (pun unintended), you think it'd even be close? I'm creating my own narrative? Lmao. You can't be serious. That's exactly what leftists claim to hate about Biden and what they love about Sanders. They hate that Biden is willing to compromise on his positions and many don't believe Sanders would.

You and I understand that Bernie would've had to compromise on his ideals eventually, but do the most ardent of his supporters realize that?
maybe they're smarter then you give them credit for and understand that someone can be relatively more inflexible then joe biden while still picking his battles

not all of them obviously but more then seem to be credited here
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,676
Just want to say as a black dude, could you leave us out of these slap fights?

Especially the self-proclaimed leftists or "true progressives" who run with people who call black voters "low information" and think we're too stupid to hear the thinly-veiled "niggers" underneath.
It's w/e, and leftists deserve their agency, but my even as a libsoc my black ass is voting for self-preservation while our chapter spreads the good word. Can't be picky when I reside in a swing state and got family depending on Obamacare.

Just hoping we can get a solid, progressive policy platform for our next administration. The current crisis demands it.
 

GYODX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,244
maybe they're smarter then you give them credit for and understand that someone can be relatively more inflexible then joe biden while still picking his battles

not all of them obviously but more then seem to be credited here
I don't think they're unintelligent, I just think the loudest of them are more uncompromising in their ideological purity than you think they are.

The way they've turned on Elizabeth Warren despite the fantastic work she's done (to include the establishment of an entire agency dedicated to protecting consumers) is proof of that.

You could literally dedicate your entire career to helping out the little guy, but give an inch and suddenly you're a traitor to the cause and a snake.
 
Last edited:

ostrichKing

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,468
that sounds like a narrative that you've created for yourself based on how you view his inflexibility

if Bernie won the nomination would eventually have to compromise in terms of who he was reaching out to.

Excusing Joe for his choices while chiding Bernie seems not to be fair at all. That's kind of a flimsy reason to hold a double standard
When has Bernie ever compromised on anything ever? (Not necessarily a bad thing, but part of the reason he's never really been able to grow his base)
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
I was privately betting on the compromise voters to compromise with Bernie rather than expecting the purity voters to suddenly become compromise voters in the event of a Biden victory. Like I discussed with TheAlbatross earlier, I generally don't expect people to modify their behavior and behave contrary to their MO without great amounts of stress.

Basically, my idea was Bernie = purists + compromisers while Biden = only the compromisers. It turned out to be a bad call electorally, but why would anyone expect the purists to stop behaving like purists? That's just a bizarre expectation, like thinking Trump supporters will vote Biden. Its a made up fantasy and no one should be drafting plans around it.

The point is moot anyway. They represent an electorally insignificant segment of the population, going by primary performance, so the insistence that we gossip about THE CHAPOS here seems ludicrous to me.
 

SmokeMaxX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,336
I was privately betting on the compromise voters to compromise with Bernie rather than expecting the purity voters to suddenly become compromise voters in the event of a Biden victory. Like I discussed with TheAlbatross earlier, I generally don't expect people to modify their behavior and behave contrary to their MO without great amounts of stress.

Basically, my idea was Bernie = purists + compromisers while Biden = only the compromisers. It turned out to be a bad call electorally, but why would anyone expect the purists to stop behaving like purists? That's just a bizarre expectation, like thinking Trump supporters will vote Biden. Its a made up fantasy and no one should be drafting plans around it.

The point is moot anyway. They represent an electorally insignificant segment of the population, going by primary performance, so the insistence that we gossip about THE CHAPOS here seems ludicrous to me.
People that voted for Trump could vote Biden. I mean, many Obama voters went to Trump. It just depends what certain voters value more. The hardcore Trumpers are obviously a lost cause.
 

Fart Master

Prophet of Truth
The Fallen
Oct 28, 2017
10,328
A dumpster
Just want to say as a black dude, could you leave us out of these slap fights?

Especially the self-proclaimed leftists or "true progressives" who run with people who call black voters "low information" and think we're too stupid to hear the thinly-veiled "niggers" underneath.
^
this thread has had some embarrassing ass post in the last month
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
Here's a video of Brie pushing the "Trump is more left than Biden" narrative
After watching the video it seems like she's pushing a "just because everyone suddenly wants to give socialism a shot now doesn't mean we should just forget about it after the crisis is over" narrative.

Basically this:

I do think its exceedingly ironic the GOP is flirting with UBI as a response to COVID-19. That is some dialectic as hell materialism.
I wrote this one year ago and stand by it. People didn't want the easy transition to socialism which Bernie could've been and now they get to speedrun it.
You get a choice between an uncertain chaotic future or a guaranteed shitty future, unless you're of a certain wealth and class.

It is unfortunate it took a global pandemic to get people to give socialism a chance but now that its here we should milk it for all its worth.
 
Mar 18, 2020
2,434
Yeah...

In that Gray video she's just parroting the same lie about Biden saying he'd veto M4A in any form that was insanely popular last week.

And she definitely sounds like the kind of person who'd vote for Jill Stein. Kind of her to subtitle the clip.
 

ChippyTurtle

Banned
Oct 13, 2018
4,773
all this firing on Bernie by allies, the first Politico i was like "ehhh", but as more line up, seems to be truther than false.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
Yeah, wasnt a guy calling chapo republicans? Smh
Tell me how them advocating for their fans to stay home to help Trump win as a punishment against Democrats makes the any better than Republicans advocating to vote for Trump.

Whats the difference? As they are trying to achieve the exact same goal. Elect Trump. It is just their motivation is some sort of revenge based punishment due to being angry that they lost. But they are trying to achieve the same exact goal in November.

They are doing effectively the same exact thing. Pushing voters to act in a way to benefit Trump and help him get re-elected. Hell, what they are doing is actually WORSE because they are pushing help re-elect Trump in November towards an audience who may have been more receptive to voting Biden than an average Republican otherwise.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
I mean, fuck, they're pretty much campaigning for them at this point. If the shoe fits!
Yep! That's what my point is too.

There is no difference between pushing to re-elect Trump as punishment on Democrats for picking Biden over Bernie vs. pushing to re-elect Trump due to supporting Trump earnestly.

In the end it is all just support for Trump. Doesn't matter the intentions when the end goal is trying to achieve the same result.
 
OP
OP
Poodlestrike

Poodlestrike

Smooth vs. Crunchy
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
13,496
Yep! That's what my point is too.

There is no difference between pushing to re-elect Trump as punishment on Democrats for picking Biden over Bernie vs. pushing to re-elect Trump due to supporting Trump earnestly.

In the end it is all just support for Trump. Doesn't matter the intentions when the end goal is trying to achieve the same result.
Yup.
 

alexiswrite

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,418
I was privately betting on the compromise voters to compromise with Bernie rather than expecting the purity voters to suddenly become compromise voters in the event of a Biden victory. Like I discussed with TheAlbatross earlier, I generally don't expect people to modify their behavior and behave contrary to their MO without great amounts of stress.

Basically, my idea was Bernie = purists + compromisers while Biden = only the compromisers. It turned out to be a bad call electorally, but why would anyone expect the purists to stop behaving like purists? That's just a bizarre expectation, like thinking Trump supporters will vote Biden. Its a made up fantasy and no one should be drafting plans around it.

The point is moot anyway. They represent an electorally insignificant segment of the population, going by primary performance, so the insistence that we gossip about THE CHAPOS here seems ludicrous to me.

I don't know why anyone is surprised that the most visible face of the online left is being discussed.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
How do you let someone like this be a part of your campaign? You can't expand support beyond your factionalists if you're not bothering to earn anyone else's trust.
Narcissism. It's why nothing is ever learned. It's always someone else's fault. You're always a victim of the conspiracy you've created to explain away failure, preventing you from ever learning a goddamn thing.
 

V_Arnold

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,166
Hungary
User Warned: Hostility
Endorse Trump already, Brie.

We know you want to.

Fuck Bernie's senior campaign staff.
She's nothing more than a selfish and sanctimonious gas lighting troll.
to keep the grift going by any means necessary.

in short, shes terrible.

That you are this triggered by Brie pushing medicare for all because THAT is the most important issue during a FUCKING PANDEMIC, is just mind-blowing.
And of course, there is nothing even remotely controversial or even hostile in that video.

The length some of you go to prove the double standards regarding "unity" and "hostility" is just magnificient to watch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.