• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Oddish1

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,818
It's really weird to see people flipping out over Warren endorsing somebody because there isn't really a lot of evidence that endorsements are that effective. There's certainly little reason to suspect that Warren endorsing Sanders would have any effect on his campaign. It kinda just feels like Sanders' supporters are just grasping at straws to avoid admitting that the primary is pretty much over at this point.
 

TheGhost

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,137
Long Island
yeah might wanna check the news. no one needs to pressure them since they'll fall into line anyway.
Yeah....because that's what you do and it's about time. Republicans do it, it works for them all the damn time why can't we do it. Why does it always have to be "no this person is not good enough"

you know what republicans do? Oh it got a R next to it? Vote for it.
 

peppersky

Banned
Mar 9, 2018
1,174
Yeah....because that's what you do and it's about time. Republicans do it, it works for them all the damn time why can't we do it. Why does it always have to be "no this person is not good enough"

you know what republicans do? Oh it got a R next to it? Vote for it.
are you seriously asking this? because this isn't a fucking football game where it's just about one team winning over the other. maybe some people actually care about policies and shit
 
Oct 30, 2017
502
edition.cnn.com

CNN poll: Biden has double-digit lead over Sanders for Democratic nomination

Former Vice President Joe Biden has a double-digit lead over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for the Democratic presidential nomination, a new CNN poll of Democratic voters nationwide conducted by SSRS shows.

CNN poll: Biden has double-digit lead over Sanders for Democratic nomination

(CNN) Former Vice President Joe Biden has a double-digit lead over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for the Democratic presidential nomination, a new CNN poll of Democratic voters nationwide conducted by SSRS shows.
Biden is now the choice of a majority of Democratic voters nationwide, according to the poll, which was taken in the days after the former vice president's stronger-than-expected showing across Super Tuesday contests and as the field of Democratic contenders with a realistic shot at winning the nomination narrowed to two.
The poll finds 52% of registered voters who are Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents say they want to see Biden win the nomination, while 36% say they'd rather see Sanders win. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who dropped out of the race on Thursday, lands at 7% in the poll.
 

TwoDelay

Member
Apr 6, 2018
1,326
Open your eyeballs, go on Twitter
I'm not going do the work for you just so you can explain away someone's toxicity. If you don't see a problem with the shitty way people have been acting then there is going to be no getting through to you. Hell im sure you can find toxic Bernie fans on here as well.
Ok here are the replies to the AOC:

Is there a single horrible toxic bernie bro comment that'd you'd like to point out in particular? I really want to know what your basing your claims off
 

Capra

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,594
are you seriously asking this? because this isn't a fucking football game where it's just about one team winning over the other. maybe some people actually care about policies and shit

I'm just glad Bloomberg didn't win. Imagine the nuclear-hot takes we'd be seeing right about now if he had.
 

Pixieking

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,956
are you seriously asking this? because this isn't a fucking football game where it's just about one team winning over the other. maybe some people actually care about policies and shit

I mean, it's both. The Primary should have people voting for who they believe they want to run in November. And once November comes, anyone who cares about the future of the country should vote for whoever is the Democratic candidate.
 

DryCreek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,987
Open your eyeballs, go on Twitter
I'm not going do the work for you just so you can explain away someone's toxicity. If you don't see a problem with the shitty way people have been acting then there is going to be no getting through to you. Hell im sure you can find toxic Bernie fans on here as well.

If you are focusing on extremely online people then you are getting an extremely filtered and self selected and/or selected for you by an algorithm that feeds you content you engage with. combined with bad faith actors (trolls and other states wanting to sow discord) your view on society its likely not representative of reality.

You can find toxic fans of everything. But if we are talking about if Bernie fans being more toxic than other front runner fans, then even the data we have shows that Bernie fans are toxic to the same proportion as supporters of any of the other front-runners. yes it feels like they are more toxic because there is literally more very online bernie stans than of any other candidate.

I absolutely implore people to get off twitter. it gives very loud megaphones to absolute shitheads and it ends up with you getting views of what certain groups of people are like based off of a sample size that doesn't represent the group.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
We can't control the shit the GOP spews

We can however, not have "allies" and "leftists" willingly spread them and attempt to legitimize conspiracy shit from the right.

This isn't really about protecting Biden, at all. It's about our own site and the fact that we have people rushing in to tell us about how Biden is losing his mind and linking the same alt-right twitter account with the same doctored video.

We control our own house, that's what's at play right now. It's a small piece of a larger piece.

And for me, this is about trying to get people who talk about being progressive not fucking act like school yard bullies in regards to things like stutters or speech issues in relation to legitimizing and acting like people who suffer from those things have degrading minds or some shit.
Brilliant post that everyone needs to follow.

We shouldn't be doing the job of fucking DONALD TRUMP and spread alt-right smears and lies about the soon-to-be Democratic Nominee for President that will be our only hope to defeat Trump.
 

UltimateHigh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,500
We can't control the shit the GOP spews

We can however, not have "allies" and "leftists" willingly spread them and attempt to legitimize conspiracy shit from the right.

This isn't really about protecting Biden, at all. It's about our own site and the fact that we have people rushing in to tell us about how Biden is losing his mind and linking the same alt-right twitter account with the same doctored video.

We control our own house, that's what's at play right now. It's a small piece of a larger pie.

And for me, this is about trying to get people who talk about being progressive not fucking act like school yard bullies in regards to things like stutters or speech issues in relation to legitimizing and acting like people who suffer from those things have degrading minds or some shit.

it happened with hillary. and it will continue to happen with biden.
 

DryCreek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,987
its wrong to spread conspiracies yes, but there are genuine reasons to not be happy with Biden and if someone has a problem with Biden's many issues then they are well within their right to criticize him for that no matter their political background.

This just all sounds like setting up the backdrop to blaming Bernie supporters if Biden loses again...

Guys we have to come together as a group and i think characterizing fans of a nominee of being certain ways will do nothing but drive a wedge.

Biden fans:
Bernie supporters are scared because Biden doesn't want to do a lot of the things they feel is really important. Things that if they aren't done may lead to the further struggles of people they really care about. give them a carrot, tell them its going to be okay and that you will continue to fight for the things they care about, you just believe Biden is the first step on the way to those goals. yes its looks likely that Biden is gonna win the nominee so be a graceful winner I know its tough to talk to a lot of people that are being adversarial but its because they are feeling rejected its best to not make them feel further cast out.

Bernie fans:
Thigns are gonna be okay, Id rather bernie won too but if the democratic membership arent there for it then so be it. A lot of people in the US want politics to return to stability first. when we are on "solid ground" we can then work together to push for the more radical (for the US ) policies that we want to see. please be open to supporting Biden if he gets the nominee, he isn't perfect but we may not have a choice.
 
Last edited:

TheGhost

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,137
Long Island
A lot of people in the US want politics to return to stability first. when we are on "solid ground" we can then work together to push for the more radical (for the US ) policies that we want to see. please be open to supporting Biden if he gets the nominee, he isn't perfect but we may not have a choice.
This is where I've been at for months
 

peppersky

Banned
Mar 9, 2018
1,174
A lot of people in the US want politics to return to stability first. when we are on "solid ground" we can then work together to push for the more radical (for the US ) policies that we want to see.
That's literally impossible with Biden though. Even if Biden wins, which is doubtful, a return to Obama era "civility and stability" politics is not going to do anything to stop the rise of neo-facism in the US. And the US hasn't even gotten the worst of it, try having a real refugee crisis and the republicans are going to start winning literally everything.
 

DryCreek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,987
That's literally impossible with Biden though. Even if Biden wins, which is doubtful, a return to Obama era "civility and stability" politics is not going to do anything to stop the rise of neo-facism in the US. And the US hasn't even gotten the worst of it, try having a real refugee crisis and the republicans are going to start winning literally everything.

I know these are my concerns too. But a return to normal may allow the Democratic party to refocus on these issues instead of just being reactive against trump. I would be surprised if Biden can do any more than one term anyway so dems will have to get someone ready for 2024 (I'm hoping for AoC personally)

But even if things transpire as we fear then a managed decline is still vastly preferable to Trumps scorched earth. I know this isnt a very positive outlook on my half and it makes it more difficult to get enthusiastic about biden. but what happens is what happens.
 

Deleted member 2834

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,620

Deleted member 82

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,626
Doesn't feel like there were lessons learned from 2016 so it it's pretty clear that's exactly where we're heading

Speaking of lessons, as someone who didn't follow the 2016 election and didn't know who McGovern was, I find this look back on the 1972 election to be fascinating:

newrepublic.com

What Democrats Still Don’t Get About McGovern

The party took all the wrong lessons from his landslide loss to Richard Nixon in '72.

It's also pretty frightening and disheartening. The article was written in 2016, but many parts feel echo 2020 and 1972. It's a pretty long piece, but I suggest everyone read it. A few quotes:

But the Democrats' fear of McGovernism is misplaced. McGovern didn't lose because he was too far to the left. He lost because he was facing a popular incumbent presiding over a booming economy.

Instead of looking at Bernie Sanders and seeing George McGovern, Democrats should reconsider McGovern himself: He should have become the party's Barry Goldwater. [...] The GOP's response to Goldwater's landslide defeat couldn't have been more different from the Democrats' reaction to McGovern's. Whereas the Democrats shifted away from McGovernism towards tepid centrism, Republicans ultimately embraced Goldwater's radical conservatism, paving the way for Ronald Reagan's eight Goldwater-esque years in the White House.

Today, every Republican candidate prays at the altar of Reagan, not only by making his name a mantra, but also by making top-heavy tax cuts, muscular militarism, and denunciations of welfare a must for any GOP presidential contender. In reality, they're genuflecting at the shrine of Goldwater. Such has been the GOP's shift to the right that even the elements of Goldwaterism that Reagan downplayed for political expediency, especially the privatization of Social Security and Medicare, have found their way into GOP orthodoxy. For good reason, many liberals and conservatives now see Goldwater as perhaps "the most consequential loser in American politics."

The same could not be said of George McGovern.

The McGovern team devised a two-pronged strategy to counter the South's defection. First, McGovern would align himself with recent social movements to a degree that no previous Democrat had contemplated. This meant courting members of movements dismissed by many Democrats as mere "identity politics," including African Americans, students, women, and gays and lesbians. This strategy would not only solidify African Americans' shift to the Democratic Party, but also would add to the Democratic coalition a bevy of educated white-collar voters for whom issues like the Vietnam War or women's rights were paramount.

The second prong of McGovern's strategy was to woo poor and working-class whites in the North away from conservative Democrat George Wallace with a populist pocketbook pitch that foregrounded issues of economic inequality and the political power of the wealthy. Following decades of decline, income inequality began rising after 1968. At the same time, inflation was squeezing Americans' pocketbooks, and the U.S. tax system was becoming less progressive, thanks to rising rates for low- and middle-income Americans and both falling rates and expanding loopholes for the rich. Seven in ten Americans in the 1970s agreed that "the tax laws are written to help the rich, not the average man" and "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer." McGovern's message echoed the public's anger. "It is the establishment center," he said, "that has erected an unjust tax burden on the backs of American workers, while 40 percent of the corporations paid no federal income tax at all last year."

The combination of McGovern's outsider status and policy platform ensured that McGovern received support from few interest group leaders and outright opposition from most of the "Wall Street kingmakers" who had previously backed both Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. In response, the McGovern campaign tapped direct mail wizard Morris Dees to enable mass fundraising from small donors. The result was more than 40,000 contributions by February 1972 averaging less than $30. The McGovern campaign complemented Dees's direct-mail machine with a sophisticated door-to-door get-out-the-vote effort in key primary states.

To the surprise of nearly everyone outside of the McGovern campaign itself, the strategy worked. In confidential memos, the Nixon reelection campaign called the George Wallace and McGovern efforts "the only two smart campaigns." McGovern, in particular, worried Nixon's advisers because his "class appeal" was "pinning the adjective 'rich' to Republicans." McGovern had been "badly underestimated" and was "potentially very dangerous to the President," the Nixon analysis concluded.

Perhaps the deepest damage to McGovern's campaign came not from its own ineptitude, but from the candidate's fellow Democrats. Early in the primaries, an adviser for Hubert Humphrey, one of McGovern's main opponents for the nomination, promised, "We are going to show that McGovern is a radical, just like Goldwater was in 1964."

As McGovern barreled toward the nomination, leading Democrats' attacks became more desperate. Anti-McGovern Democrats staged an "Anybody But McGovern" movement at the convention.

In reality, neoliberalism was based on an electoral myth.

Any Democratic nominee was doomed in 1972. Modern election forecasting models based on variables like the state of the economy and the incumbent's approval ratings make clear, in retrospect, that Nixon was destined to win in a landslide. [...]
[The Democrats could have resurrected FDR and Nixon would have trounced him in 1972.

The neoliberals' decades-long mantra that McGovern's radicalism was to blame for Nixon's victory, then, is squarely at odds with the reality of the 1972 election. More significantly, this mistaken analysis has obscured the ways in which McGovern's campaign strategies and policies anticipated the political environment of the late-twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.

In contrast, McGovern's calls for loophole-closing tax reform, proposal to use federal aid to curb hikes in regressive state and local taxes, support for payroll tax-funded single-payer healthcare, and Demogrant plan all would have done much to combat inequality. Moreover, contrary to neolibs' insistence that McGovern's platform was little more than warmed-over big government liberalism, proposals like the Demogrant actually contained more than a little tinge of libertarianism, thanks to the simplicity of cutting every American a check, rather than forcing them to navigate a complex bureaucracy.

Sanders's political strategy of energizing young and working-class voters and soliciting large numbers of small donations is McGovernism at its best. However, whereas a key demonstration of McGovern's viability was his late-primary success in convincing African Americans to abandon Hubert Humphrey, Sanders has not yet had success wooing black voters away from Hillary Clinton, a shortcoming that may ultimately decide the fate of his candidacy.

But whether it's carried by Sanders this year or a candidate like Elizabeth Warren or Keith Ellison in a future election, both demographic trends and the political realities of rising inequality suggest that a McGovernesque message of economic populism and social liberalism represents the future of the Democratic Party.

Despite this, the echoes of neoliberalism's past in the Democratic Party establishment's denunciations of Sanders's candidacy suggest that if the Democratic nominee loses this fall, the explanation offered by party leaders and mainstream pundits will be the same one that has been trotted out after every Democratic defeat since 1972. If Sanders wins the nomination and loses in the general, it will be because the public wouldn't stand for Sanders's populist radicalism, and if Hillary wins the nomination and loses in the general, it will be because Sanders damaged her centrist credentials in the primary by pulling her too far to the left.

In other words, it will be because of McGovernism.

Whoever wins the nom - and it's pretty much guaranteed to be Biden, even if Warren magically endorses Bernie today -, it's gonna be tough. If Biden wins the nom, people should vote for him if they want the lesser of two evils, but I'm not sure the increased turn-out in the Primaries will translate to a GE turn-out that's energized enough to beat Trump's base, especially when some key demographics were overwhelmingly in favor of Sanders (namely the young and Latinx people). Trump, though he's sundowning like Biden, is still the incumbent, with a high approval rating and a perception that the economy is in good shape to boot. And Biden's appeal to decency and dignity and centrist platform might not provide enough contrast to Trump's platform to motivate everyone. It lacks boldness and vision but blindly acts like being dignified is enough to beat the guy who won precisely because he said "screw you" to the rules. It remains to be seen how much coronavirus impacts the race though. It's kind of a wild card. And I wonder how much ground game will matter as well; Biden campaigns more than he did before ST, but it's not like his appearances are long or anything. Then again, Sanders has been busting his ass off on that front from day 1, yet here we are.
 

Deleted member 46493

User requested account closure
Banned
Aug 7, 2018
5,231
What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
Get this rightwing conspiracy theory trash out of here. This is "Obama was born in Kenya."/"Hillary is hiding that she is very ill and dying" right wing fake social media trash.


What you "hear" is made up fake alt-right conspiracies that Bernie twitter has shamelessly latched on to.
 

Ortix

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,438
What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.

What you hear are lies spread by the Dirtbag Left on twitter. Check your goddamn sources.
 

Big Baybee

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,774
What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
I knew it would be like this when Bernie lost again. Was why I hoped he wouldn't run again and Warren, the much better politician, could grab those progressive votes and build on the coalition. People are losing their shit and it's really sad.
 

Slayven

Never read a comic in his life
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
93,042
www.nytimes.com

Cory Booker Endorses Joe Biden as Candidates Race Toward More Primaries (Published 2020)

Mr. Booker’s endorsement of Mr. Biden came one day after Kamala Harris’s, and a day before primary elections in Michigan, Washington State and elsewhere.

Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey endorsed former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. for president on Monday, adding to what has become a nearly complete consolidation of support from Mr. Biden's former top rivals to push him to the Democratic nomination.
 

Troast

Banned
Oct 31, 2017
844
This BS about Biden can't beat Trump needs to stop. The fact is Biden has a better chance than Bernie.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
I knew it would be like this when Bernie lost again. Was why I hoped he wouldn't run again and Warren, the much better politician, could grab those progressive votes and build on the coalition. People are losing their shit and it's really sad.
Instead of accepting the loss many are running straight into the arms of alt-right social media and embracing their vile disgusting conspiracy theories instead.

Like, how can someone claim to be left and do that?
 

Pixieking

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,956
Genuinely, more people need to critically and in an unbiased fashion examine the "news" they read. Because I refuse to believe every single person coming in here talking about dementia and changing debate rules because Joe asked and speaking for 7 minutes is doing it on bad faith. I cannot believe that people are so warped as to do that so much, so often, and so shamelessly.
 

Deleted member 46493

User requested account closure
Banned
Aug 7, 2018
5,231
Genuinely, more people need to critically and in an unbiased fashion examine the "news" they read. Because I refuse to believe every single person coming in here talking about dementia and changing debate rules because Joe asked and speaking for 7 minutes is doing it on bad faith. I cannot believe that people are so warped as to that so much.
I just read it somewhere - should've checked before posting about it. My bad. Doesn't seem to be true::

www.politico.com

Sanders, Biden camps clash over Arizona debate format

A proposal to have the candidates seated for the first time sparks tension.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
Genuinely, more people need to critically and in an unbiased fashion examine the "news" they read. Because I refuse to believe every single person coming in here talking about dementia and changing debate rules because Joe asked and speaking for 7 minutes is doing it on bad faith. I cannot believe that people are so warped as to that so much.
They blindly accept anything they see on social media that matches their pre-conceived opinions and are making zero attempt to vet the sourcing to see that it is doctored and heavily edited videos coming from the alt-right to divide Democrats and help Trump.
 

Ortix

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,438
Genuinely, more people need to critically and in an unbiased fashion examine the "news" they read. Because I refuse to believe every single person coming in here talking about dementia and changing debate rules because Joe asked and speaking for 7 minutes is doing it on bad faith. I cannot believe that people are so warped as to do that so much, so often, and so shamelessly. Because you all give "progressives" a bad name in doing this, whether it's naivete or not.
They blindly accept anything they see on social media that matches their pre-conceived opinions and are making zero attempt to vet the sourcing to see that it is doctored and heavily edited videos coming from the alt-right to divide Democrats and help Trump.

Sure, that's a big part of it.... But there's also the fact that this is being spread by people from the Sanders campaign itself. That's not really helping.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
Sure, that's a big part of it.... But there's also the fact that this is being spread by people from the Sanders campaign itself. That's not really helping.
That is the sad part. They are willingly spreading doctored videos created by the Trump campaign to help elect Donald Trump. It is maddening.
 

Kusagari

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,383
Ok here are the replies to the AOC:

Is there a single horrible toxic bernie bro comment that'd you'd like to point out in particular? I really want to know what your basing your claims off


The fact you keep defending the reaction to that innocuous tweet is hilarious. No wonder you're confused why people hate the dirtbag left.
 

Pixieking

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,956
Sure, that's a big part of it.... But there's also the fact that this is being spread by people from the Sanders campaign itself. That's not really helping.

No, it's really not, hence the "unbiased" part. Like, people need to use common sense and ask themselves if something could be true, or likely to be true, or just propaganda. Because every political campaign will be biased, and the Sanders campaign isn't immune to this.
 

Erpy

Member
May 31, 2018
2,996
That's literally impossible with Biden though. Even if Biden wins, which is doubtful, a return to Obama era "civility and stability" politics is not going to do anything to stop the rise of neo-facism in the US. And the US hasn't even gotten the worst of it, try having a real refugee crisis and the republicans are going to start winning literally everything.

How exactly will Sanders stop the rise of neo-facism in the US where Biden won't? A major factor that helped Trump in 2016 wasn't so much "economic anxiety", but rather a white conservative voter base seeing its cultural power diminish to the point where they felt like they were gonna be the minority soon and placing their hopes in the guy who promised to burn it all down. And despite Trump being in office, those same people still feel like they're losing the culture war. I feel a large part of this lies in factors that aren't directly influenced by who's in the White House meaning neither Sanders nor Biden would be able to do much to stop it.

Whoever wins the nom - and it's pretty much guaranteed to be Biden, even if Warren magically endorses Bernie today -, it's gonna be tough. If Biden wins the nom, people should vote for him if they want the lesser of two evils, but I'm not sure the increased turn-out in the Primaries will translate to a GE turn-out that's energized enough to beat Trump's base, especially when some key demographics were overwhelmingly in favor of Sanders (namely the young and Latinx people). Trump, though he's sundowning like Biden, is still the incumbent, with a high approval rating and a perception that the economy is in good shape to boot. And Biden's appeal to decency and dignity and centrist platform might not provide enough contrast to Trump's platform to motivate everyone. It lacks boldness and vision but blindly acts like being dignified is enough to beat the guy who won precisely because he said "screw you" to the rules. It remains to be seen how much coronavirus impacts the race though. It's kind of a wild card. And I wonder how much ground game will matter as well; Biden campaigns more than he did before ST, but it's not like his appearances are long or anything. Then again, Sanders has been busting his ass off on that front from day 1, yet here we are.

Why do you think the increased turn-out in the primaries won't translate to increases in the general? Especially how a large part of the increased turnout favored Biden, why would people vote to make him the nominee and then stay home in November?

To be honest, I believe that the "energized" argument is kind of overcredited. The biggest energizer and motivator in the race remains Donald Trump. Most Americans who aren't part of his MAGA base, moderates, independents and liberals alike, friggin' hate him and as unfortunate as it is, hate is often a bigger turn-out booster than any kind of positive message. It's how our brains are hard-wired.

The thing about "energizing" is that it's seldom a one-way street. What energizes a politician's base is also what frequently energizes a politician's critics. This is true for Trump and might be true for Sanders as well. It might partially explain why for all of Sanders' energized following, he got blown out by voters who didn't want him to become the nominee.
 

Bitch Pudding

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,202
User Banned (July 22): Repeatedly violating the Primary OT staff post
Speaking of lessons, as someone who didn't follow the 2016 election and didn't know who McGovern was, I find this look back on the 1972 election to be fascinating:

It's also pretty frightening and disheartening. The article was written in 2016, but many parts feel echo 2020 and 1972. It's a pretty long piece, but I suggest everyone read it. A few quotes:

(a few quotes)

Whoever wins the nom - and it's pretty much guaranteed to be Biden, even if Warren magically endorses Bernie today -, it's gonna be tough. If Biden wins the nom, people should vote for him if they want the lesser of two evils, but I'm not sure the increased turn-out in the Primaries will translate to a GE turn-out that's energized enough to beat Trump's base, especially when some key demographics were overwhelmingly in favor of Sanders (namely the young and Latinx people). Trump, though he's sundowning like Biden, is still the incumbent, with a high approval rating and a perception that the economy is in good shape to boot. And Biden's appeal to decency and dignity and centrist platform might not provide enough contrast to Trump's platform to motivate everyone. It lacks boldness and vision but blindly acts like being dignified is enough to beat the guy who won precisely because he said "screw you" to the rules. It remains to be seen how much coronavirus impacts the race though. It's kind of a wild card. And I wonder how much ground game will matter as well; Biden campaigns more than he did before ST, but it's not like his appearances are long or anything. Then again, Sanders has been busting his ass off on that front from day 1, yet here we are.

Next time you post bullshit like this, please start with "People who vote for Biden want the lesser of two evils". Saves me a lot of time without having to put you on any list, thanks in advance.
 

DryCreek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,987
This BS about Biden can't beat Trump needs to stop. The fact is Biden has a better chance than Bernie.

Both poll within spitting distance of each-other against Trump.

heh what i said is beingtaken to heart looking at the above posters.

stop othring sanders supporters if you want them to support biden.
 

Oddish1

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,818
Speaking of lessons, as someone who didn't follow the 2016 election and didn't know who McGovern was, I find this look back on the 1972 election to be fascinating:

newrepublic.com

What Democrats Still Don’t Get About McGovern

The party took all the wrong lessons from his landslide loss to Richard Nixon in '72.

It's also pretty frightening and disheartening. The article was written in 2016, but many parts feel echo 2020 and 1972. It's a pretty long piece, but I suggest everyone read it. A few quotes:


Whoever wins the nom - and it's pretty much guaranteed to be Biden, even if Warren magically endorses Bernie today -, it's gonna be tough. If Biden wins the nom, people should vote for him if they want the lesser of two evils, but I'm not sure the increased turn-out in the Primaries will translate to a GE turn-out that's energized enough to beat Trump's base, especially when some key demographics were overwhelmingly in favor of Sanders (namely the young and Latinx people). Trump, though he's sundowning like Biden, is still the incumbent, with a high approval rating and a perception that the economy is in good shape to boot. And Biden's appeal to decency and dignity and centrist platform might not provide enough contrast to Trump's platform to motivate everyone. It lacks boldness and vision but blindly acts like being dignified is enough to beat the guy who won precisely because he said "screw you" to the rules. It remains to be seen how much coronavirus impacts the race though. It's kind of a wild card. And I wonder how much ground game will matter as well; Biden campaigns more than he did before ST, but it's not like his appearances are long or anything. Then again, Sanders has been busting his ass off on that front from day 1, yet here we are.
I was reading this earlier and I thought it was pretty insightful. I do think that the article places too much value on what the "establishment" wants from a candidate versus what the electorate wants. Like, Jimmy Carter wasn't handpicked by party leaders, there was a primary that he won with a campaign and winning the most Dem voters. And I think the 2016 Republican primary shows that the party leaders can't actually stop a candidate that voters have picked so if a more socialist candidate formed on the Democrat side who had voters' support then they couldn't actually do much. So I'm hesitant to say that it's entirely the democrat leaders that have caused the party to become more centrist as much as it is the electorate changing at the time. And hopefully we're seeing it change again to more leftist policies.
 

RoKKeR

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,375
www.nytimes.com

Cory Booker Endorses Joe Biden as Candidates Race Toward More Primaries (Published 2020)

Mr. Booker’s endorsement of Mr. Biden came one day after Kamala Harris’s, and a day before primary elections in Michigan, Washington State and elsewhere.
They're really rolling them out huh. Let's see how he does tomorrow - even if he loses Michigan, he'll likely run up the score in other states and then we have FL the week following, which I expect won't go too well for Bernie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.