I want exampleYeah this only applies if the Bernie bro actually said it in toxic-less manner, you know they don't.
I want exampleYeah this only applies if the Bernie bro actually said it in toxic-less manner, you know they don't.
Open your eyeballs, go on Twitter
Yeah....because that's what you do and it's about time. Republicans do it, it works for them all the damn time why can't we do it. Why does it always have to be "no this person is not good enough"yeah might wanna check the news. no one needs to pressure them since they'll fall into line anyway.
are you seriously asking this? because this isn't a fucking football game where it's just about one team winning over the other. maybe some people actually care about policies and shitYeah....because that's what you do and it's about time. Republicans do it, it works for them all the damn time why can't we do it. Why does it always have to be "no this person is not good enough"
you know what republicans do? Oh it got a R next to it? Vote for it.
CNN poll: Biden has double-digit lead over Sanders for Democratic nomination
(CNN) Former Vice President Joe Biden has a double-digit lead over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for the Democratic presidential nomination, a new CNN poll of Democratic voters nationwide conducted by SSRS shows.
Biden is now the choice of a majority of Democratic voters nationwide, according to the poll, which was taken in the days after the former vice president's stronger-than-expected showing across Super Tuesday contests and as the field of Democratic contenders with a realistic shot at winning the nomination narrowed to two.
The poll finds 52% of registered voters who are Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents say they want to see Biden win the nomination, while 36% say they'd rather see Sanders win. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who dropped out of the race on Thursday, lands at 7% in the poll.
That is 100% what it is.It kinda just feels like Sanders' supporters are just grasping at straws to avoid admitting that the primary is pretty much over at this point.
Ok here are the replies to the AOC:Open your eyeballs, go on Twitter
I'm not going do the work for you just so you can explain away someone's toxicity. If you don't see a problem with the shitty way people have been acting then there is going to be no getting through to you. Hell im sure you can find toxic Bernie fans on here as well.
are you seriously asking this? because this isn't a fucking football game where it's just about one team winning over the other. maybe some people actually care about policies and shit
are you seriously asking this? because this isn't a fucking football game where it's just about one team winning over the other. maybe some people actually care about policies and shit
Open your eyeballs, go on Twitter
I'm not going do the work for you just so you can explain away someone's toxicity. If you don't see a problem with the shitty way people have been acting then there is going to be no getting through to you. Hell im sure you can find toxic Bernie fans on here as well.
Brilliant post that everyone needs to follow.We can't control the shit the GOP spews
We can however, not have "allies" and "leftists" willingly spread them and attempt to legitimize conspiracy shit from the right.
This isn't really about protecting Biden, at all. It's about our own site and the fact that we have people rushing in to tell us about how Biden is losing his mind and linking the same alt-right twitter account with the same doctored video.
We control our own house, that's what's at play right now. It's a small piece of a larger piece.
And for me, this is about trying to get people who talk about being progressive not fucking act like school yard bullies in regards to things like stutters or speech issues in relation to legitimizing and acting like people who suffer from those things have degrading minds or some shit.
We can't control the shit the GOP spews
We can however, not have "allies" and "leftists" willingly spread them and attempt to legitimize conspiracy shit from the right.
This isn't really about protecting Biden, at all. It's about our own site and the fact that we have people rushing in to tell us about how Biden is losing his mind and linking the same alt-right twitter account with the same doctored video.
We control our own house, that's what's at play right now. It's a small piece of a larger pie.
And for me, this is about trying to get people who talk about being progressive not fucking act like school yard bullies in regards to things like stutters or speech issues in relation to legitimizing and acting like people who suffer from those things have degrading minds or some shit.
This just all sounds like setting up the backdrop to blaming Bernie supporters if Biden loses again...
This is where I've been at for monthsA lot of people in the US want politics to return to stability first. when we are on "solid ground" we can then work together to push for the more radical (for the US ) policies that we want to see. please be open to supporting Biden if he gets the nominee, he isn't perfect but we may not have a choice.
That's literally impossible with Biden though. Even if Biden wins, which is doubtful, a return to Obama era "civility and stability" politics is not going to do anything to stop the rise of neo-facism in the US. And the US hasn't even gotten the worst of it, try having a real refugee crisis and the republicans are going to start winning literally everything.A lot of people in the US want politics to return to stability first. when we are on "solid ground" we can then work together to push for the more radical (for the US ) policies that we want to see.
Yeah this only applies if the Bernie bro actually said it in toxic-less manner, you know they don't.
That's literally impossible with Biden though. Even if Biden wins, which is doubtful, a return to Obama era "civility and stability" politics is not going to do anything to stop the rise of neo-facism in the US. And the US hasn't even gotten the worst of it, try having a real refugee crisis and the republicans are going to start winning literally everything.
Or look back at the 2018 midterms. In competitive districts, candidates backed by progressive groups like Justice Democrats and Our Revolution were shut out. They lost in either the primaries or the general election. There isn't a single Sanders-like member of Congress from a purple or red district. There are dozens of moderates.
Doesn't feel like there were lessons learned from 2016 so it it's pretty clear that's exactly where we're heading
But the Democrats' fear of McGovernism is misplaced. McGovern didn't lose because he was too far to the left. He lost because he was facing a popular incumbent presiding over a booming economy.
Instead of looking at Bernie Sanders and seeing George McGovern, Democrats should reconsider McGovern himself: He should have become the party's Barry Goldwater. [...] The GOP's response to Goldwater's landslide defeat couldn't have been more different from the Democrats' reaction to McGovern's. Whereas the Democrats shifted away from McGovernism towards tepid centrism, Republicans ultimately embraced Goldwater's radical conservatism, paving the way for Ronald Reagan's eight Goldwater-esque years in the White House.
Today, every Republican candidate prays at the altar of Reagan, not only by making his name a mantra, but also by making top-heavy tax cuts, muscular militarism, and denunciations of welfare a must for any GOP presidential contender. In reality, they're genuflecting at the shrine of Goldwater. Such has been the GOP's shift to the right that even the elements of Goldwaterism that Reagan downplayed for political expediency, especially the privatization of Social Security and Medicare, have found their way into GOP orthodoxy. For good reason, many liberals and conservatives now see Goldwater as perhaps "the most consequential loser in American politics."
The same could not be said of George McGovern.
The McGovern team devised a two-pronged strategy to counter the South's defection. First, McGovern would align himself with recent social movements to a degree that no previous Democrat had contemplated. This meant courting members of movements dismissed by many Democrats as mere "identity politics," including African Americans, students, women, and gays and lesbians. This strategy would not only solidify African Americans' shift to the Democratic Party, but also would add to the Democratic coalition a bevy of educated white-collar voters for whom issues like the Vietnam War or women's rights were paramount.
The second prong of McGovern's strategy was to woo poor and working-class whites in the North away from conservative Democrat George Wallace with a populist pocketbook pitch that foregrounded issues of economic inequality and the political power of the wealthy. Following decades of decline, income inequality began rising after 1968. At the same time, inflation was squeezing Americans' pocketbooks, and the U.S. tax system was becoming less progressive, thanks to rising rates for low- and middle-income Americans and both falling rates and expanding loopholes for the rich. Seven in ten Americans in the 1970s agreed that "the tax laws are written to help the rich, not the average man" and "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer." McGovern's message echoed the public's anger. "It is the establishment center," he said, "that has erected an unjust tax burden on the backs of American workers, while 40 percent of the corporations paid no federal income tax at all last year."
The combination of McGovern's outsider status and policy platform ensured that McGovern received support from few interest group leaders and outright opposition from most of the "Wall Street kingmakers" who had previously backed both Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. In response, the McGovern campaign tapped direct mail wizard Morris Dees to enable mass fundraising from small donors. The result was more than 40,000 contributions by February 1972 averaging less than $30. The McGovern campaign complemented Dees's direct-mail machine with a sophisticated door-to-door get-out-the-vote effort in key primary states.
To the surprise of nearly everyone outside of the McGovern campaign itself, the strategy worked. In confidential memos, the Nixon reelection campaign called the George Wallace and McGovern efforts "the only two smart campaigns." McGovern, in particular, worried Nixon's advisers because his "class appeal" was "pinning the adjective 'rich' to Republicans." McGovern had been "badly underestimated" and was "potentially very dangerous to the President," the Nixon analysis concluded.
Perhaps the deepest damage to McGovern's campaign came not from its own ineptitude, but from the candidate's fellow Democrats. Early in the primaries, an adviser for Hubert Humphrey, one of McGovern's main opponents for the nomination, promised, "We are going to show that McGovern is a radical, just like Goldwater was in 1964."
As McGovern barreled toward the nomination, leading Democrats' attacks became more desperate. Anti-McGovern Democrats staged an "Anybody But McGovern" movement at the convention.
In reality, neoliberalism was based on an electoral myth.
Any Democratic nominee was doomed in 1972. Modern election forecasting models based on variables like the state of the economy and the incumbent's approval ratings make clear, in retrospect, that Nixon was destined to win in a landslide. [...]
[The Democrats could have resurrected FDR and Nixon would have trounced him in 1972.
The neoliberals' decades-long mantra that McGovern's radicalism was to blame for Nixon's victory, then, is squarely at odds with the reality of the 1972 election. More significantly, this mistaken analysis has obscured the ways in which McGovern's campaign strategies and policies anticipated the political environment of the late-twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.
In contrast, McGovern's calls for loophole-closing tax reform, proposal to use federal aid to curb hikes in regressive state and local taxes, support for payroll tax-funded single-payer healthcare, and Demogrant plan all would have done much to combat inequality. Moreover, contrary to neolibs' insistence that McGovern's platform was little more than warmed-over big government liberalism, proposals like the Demogrant actually contained more than a little tinge of libertarianism, thanks to the simplicity of cutting every American a check, rather than forcing them to navigate a complex bureaucracy.
Sanders's political strategy of energizing young and working-class voters and soliciting large numbers of small donations is McGovernism at its best. However, whereas a key demonstration of McGovern's viability was his late-primary success in convincing African Americans to abandon Hubert Humphrey, Sanders has not yet had success wooing black voters away from Hillary Clinton, a shortcoming that may ultimately decide the fate of his candidacy.
But whether it's carried by Sanders this year or a candidate like Elizabeth Warren or Keith Ellison in a future election, both demographic trends and the political realities of rising inequality suggest that a McGovernesque message of economic populism and social liberalism represents the future of the Democratic Party.
Despite this, the echoes of neoliberalism's past in the Democratic Party establishment's denunciations of Sanders's candidacy suggest that if the Democratic nominee loses this fall, the explanation offered by party leaders and mainstream pundits will be the same one that has been trotted out after every Democratic defeat since 1972. If Sanders wins the nomination and loses in the general, it will be because the public wouldn't stand for Sanders's populist radicalism, and if Hillary wins the nomination and loses in the general, it will be because Sanders damaged her centrist credentials in the primary by pulling her too far to the left.
In other words, it will be because of McGovernism.
What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
Ok why are people still coming here to spread stupid bullshit?What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
Get this rightwing conspiracy theory trash out of here. This is "Obama was born in Kenya."/"Hillary is hiding that she is very ill and dying" right wing fake social media trash.What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
It reads as no thank you but okExcept that we literally have an example of people citing Michael Brooks saying "no" and a praying emoji as "attack".
Stop. Believing. Alt-Right. Lies. Jesus Christ people. This isn't funny.
I knew it would be like this when Bernie lost again. Was why I hoped he wouldn't run again and Warren, the much better politician, could grab those progressive votes and build on the coalition. People are losing their shit and it's really sad.What's this I hear of Joe's campaign only letting him speak for 7 mins at a rally and changing the debate rules so he can sit down? I guess they don't have to hide his condition anymore now that he's the frontrunner.
Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey endorsed former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. for president on Monday, adding to what has become a nearly complete consolidation of support from Mr. Biden's former top rivals to push him to the Democratic nomination.
Instead of accepting the loss many are running straight into the arms of alt-right social media and embracing their vile disgusting conspiracy theories instead.I knew it would be like this when Bernie lost again. Was why I hoped he wouldn't run again and Warren, the much better politician, could grab those progressive votes and build on the coalition. People are losing their shit and it's really sad.
I just read it somewhere - should've checked before posting about it. My bad. Doesn't seem to be true::Genuinely, more people need to critically and in an unbiased fashion examine the "news" they read. Because I refuse to believe every single person coming in here talking about dementia and changing debate rules because Joe asked and speaking for 7 minutes is doing it on bad faith. I cannot believe that people are so warped as to that so much.
They blindly accept anything they see on social media that matches their pre-conceived opinions and are making zero attempt to vet the sourcing to see that it is doctored and heavily edited videos coming from the alt-right to divide Democrats and help Trump.Genuinely, more people need to critically and in an unbiased fashion examine the "news" they read. Because I refuse to believe every single person coming in here talking about dementia and changing debate rules because Joe asked and speaking for 7 minutes is doing it on bad faith. I cannot believe that people are so warped as to that so much.
Genuinely, more people need to critically and in an unbiased fashion examine the "news" they read. Because I refuse to believe every single person coming in here talking about dementia and changing debate rules because Joe asked and speaking for 7 minutes is doing it on bad faith. I cannot believe that people are so warped as to do that so much, so often, and so shamelessly. Because you all give "progressives" a bad name in doing this, whether it's naivete or not.
They blindly accept anything they see on social media that matches their pre-conceived opinions and are making zero attempt to vet the sourcing to see that it is doctored and heavily edited videos coming from the alt-right to divide Democrats and help Trump.
Instead of accepting the loss many are running straight into the arms of alt-right social media and embracing their vile disgusting conspiracy theories instead.
Like, how can someone claim to be left and do that?
That is the sad part. They are willingly spreading doctored videos created by the Trump campaign to help elect Donald Trump. It is maddening.Sure, that's a big part of it.... But there's also the fact that this is being spread by people from the Sanders campaign itself. That's not really helping.
Ok here are the replies to the AOC:
Is there a single horrible toxic bernie bro comment that'd you'd like to point out in particular? I really want to know what your basing your claims off
Sure, that's a big part of it.... But there's also the fact that this is being spread by people from the Sanders campaign itself. That's not really helping.
That's literally impossible with Biden though. Even if Biden wins, which is doubtful, a return to Obama era "civility and stability" politics is not going to do anything to stop the rise of neo-facism in the US. And the US hasn't even gotten the worst of it, try having a real refugee crisis and the republicans are going to start winning literally everything.
Whoever wins the nom - and it's pretty much guaranteed to be Biden, even if Warren magically endorses Bernie today -, it's gonna be tough. If Biden wins the nom, people should vote for him if they want the lesser of two evils, but I'm not sure the increased turn-out in the Primaries will translate to a GE turn-out that's energized enough to beat Trump's base, especially when some key demographics were overwhelmingly in favor of Sanders (namely the young and Latinx people). Trump, though he's sundowning like Biden, is still the incumbent, with a high approval rating and a perception that the economy is in good shape to boot. And Biden's appeal to decency and dignity and centrist platform might not provide enough contrast to Trump's platform to motivate everyone. It lacks boldness and vision but blindly acts like being dignified is enough to beat the guy who won precisely because he said "screw you" to the rules. It remains to be seen how much coronavirus impacts the race though. It's kind of a wild card. And I wonder how much ground game will matter as well; Biden campaigns more than he did before ST, but it's not like his appearances are long or anything. Then again, Sanders has been busting his ass off on that front from day 1, yet here we are.
Speaking of lessons, as someone who didn't follow the 2016 election and didn't know who McGovern was, I find this look back on the 1972 election to be fascinating:
It's also pretty frightening and disheartening. The article was written in 2016, but many parts feel echo 2020 and 1972. It's a pretty long piece, but I suggest everyone read it. A few quotes:
(a few quotes)
Whoever wins the nom - and it's pretty much guaranteed to be Biden, even if Warren magically endorses Bernie today -, it's gonna be tough. If Biden wins the nom, people should vote for him if they want the lesser of two evils, but I'm not sure the increased turn-out in the Primaries will translate to a GE turn-out that's energized enough to beat Trump's base, especially when some key demographics were overwhelmingly in favor of Sanders (namely the young and Latinx people). Trump, though he's sundowning like Biden, is still the incumbent, with a high approval rating and a perception that the economy is in good shape to boot. And Biden's appeal to decency and dignity and centrist platform might not provide enough contrast to Trump's platform to motivate everyone. It lacks boldness and vision but blindly acts like being dignified is enough to beat the guy who won precisely because he said "screw you" to the rules. It remains to be seen how much coronavirus impacts the race though. It's kind of a wild card. And I wonder how much ground game will matter as well; Biden campaigns more than he did before ST, but it's not like his appearances are long or anything. Then again, Sanders has been busting his ass off on that front from day 1, yet here we are.
This BS about Biden can't beat Trump needs to stop. The fact is Biden has a better chance than Bernie.
I was reading this earlier and I thought it was pretty insightful. I do think that the article places too much value on what the "establishment" wants from a candidate versus what the electorate wants. Like, Jimmy Carter wasn't handpicked by party leaders, there was a primary that he won with a campaign and winning the most Dem voters. And I think the 2016 Republican primary shows that the party leaders can't actually stop a candidate that voters have picked so if a more socialist candidate formed on the Democrat side who had voters' support then they couldn't actually do much. So I'm hesitant to say that it's entirely the democrat leaders that have caused the party to become more centrist as much as it is the electorate changing at the time. And hopefully we're seeing it change again to more leftist policies.Speaking of lessons, as someone who didn't follow the 2016 election and didn't know who McGovern was, I find this look back on the 1972 election to be fascinating:
What Democrats Still Don’t Get About McGovern
The party took all the wrong lessons from his landslide loss to Richard Nixon in '72.newrepublic.com
It's also pretty frightening and disheartening. The article was written in 2016, but many parts feel echo 2020 and 1972. It's a pretty long piece, but I suggest everyone read it. A few quotes:
Whoever wins the nom - and it's pretty much guaranteed to be Biden, even if Warren magically endorses Bernie today -, it's gonna be tough. If Biden wins the nom, people should vote for him if they want the lesser of two evils, but I'm not sure the increased turn-out in the Primaries will translate to a GE turn-out that's energized enough to beat Trump's base, especially when some key demographics were overwhelmingly in favor of Sanders (namely the young and Latinx people). Trump, though he's sundowning like Biden, is still the incumbent, with a high approval rating and a perception that the economy is in good shape to boot. And Biden's appeal to decency and dignity and centrist platform might not provide enough contrast to Trump's platform to motivate everyone. It lacks boldness and vision but blindly acts like being dignified is enough to beat the guy who won precisely because he said "screw you" to the rules. It remains to be seen how much coronavirus impacts the race though. It's kind of a wild card. And I wonder how much ground game will matter as well; Biden campaigns more than he did before ST, but it's not like his appearances are long or anything. Then again, Sanders has been busting his ass off on that front from day 1, yet here we are.
They're really rolling them out huh. Let's see how he does tomorrow - even if he loses Michigan, he'll likely run up the score in other states and then we have FL the week following, which I expect won't go too well for Bernie.Cory Booker Endorses Joe Biden as Candidates Race Toward More Primaries (Published 2020)
Mr. Booker’s endorsement of Mr. Biden came one day after Kamala Harris’s, and a day before primary elections in Michigan, Washington State and elsewhere.www.nytimes.com