• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
Weird then that every candidate on the stage suggested it was then.
That isn't what they were suggesting, c'mon. If Bernie has like a 20 delegate lead, yeah, things are up in the air, but if he's within spitting distance of a majority 1000% he has the nom. Hell, I'd go so far as to say if he has a plurality that's 35% or greater he wins the nom.
 

RockGun90

Member
Jul 28, 2018
438
Besides it sucking that Bernie has less of a chance of winning, it is a bit funny that everyone said "lool stupid moderate candidates what're you going to do merge together like Voltron?" and then that's literally what they did.
In fairness, Moderate Voltron only worked on the assumption that every person that voted for a moderate combined would beat Bernie, even though some of their supporters second choice is Sanders.
 

jviggy43

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,184
They can say what they want. I believe the person with the delegate plurality will win the nomination.

If that's not what happens, then we can start bitching about how unfair this all is, and I would absolutely agree.
I think its safe to say, with the way those candidates discussed the possibility and the actions of the past few days of moving around to stop Bernie, we can safely say this option would be entertained. But I certainly hope your right and glad we both agree on that hypothetical being bad if it were to happen. I really really do hope youre right.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
It flies in the face of what you just said and you know it's not as simple as getting the most votes. You can't dismiss it as "it's politicks!" because it's fundamentally broken and needs to change.
The nomination hasn't been "stolen" until the Convention denies it to the person with the delegate plurality.

Which hasn't happened.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
That's why I put the word in quotation marks. And I believe that she's certainly more moderate and establishment-friendly than Bernie.



It may be too little too late at least for Super Tuesday. At least a few of the States have early voted already. Early Pete and Amy voters got left out cold.
If she were then she would be getting establishment support; she largely isn't.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,086
So you think he'll get the nomination taken away from him even if he clears a MAJORITY of delegates? Stop being delusional please. I prefer Sanders to Biden by a large amount but this is just absurd.
1991 is the majority, not 1990.

Honestly if Bernie has any less than 1900 he'll get robbed tho, very low chances of enough moderates backing him to beat a 100+ delegate defecit.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,179

Then you haven't been paying attention. Numerous people have already announced that this is their plan.

So you think he'll get the nomination taken away from him even if he clears a MAJORITY of delegates? Stop being delusional please. I prefer Sanders to Biden by a large amount but this is just absurd.

No, I think he'll get it stolen if he doesn't get an absolute majority. He needs to get 1,991 in order to become the nominee, otherwise the party will steal it from him.
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
I think its safe to say, with the way those candidates discussed the possibility and the actions of the past few days of moving around to stop Bernie, we can safely say this option would be entertained. But I certainly hope your right and glad we both agree on that hypothetical being bad if it were to happen. I really really do hope youre right.
Bernie would have been saying literally the same thing in their shoes. The option would be entertained if the margin between 1st and 2nd is tiny, like less than 2%.
 

jviggy43

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,184
That isn't what they were suggesting, c'mon. If Bernie has like a 20 delegate lead, yeah, things are up in the air, but if he's within spitting distance of a majority 1000% he has the nom. Hell, I'd go so far as to say if he has a plurality that's 35% or greater he wins the nom.
Its funny that you say this wont happen but then come out and go "well if he had a small lead then maybe things go up in the air". Idk what it is with some people and thinking that you need a certain amount more votes to not have the nom stolen from you, but I assure you, no one is going to look at it that way if they do it other than liberals who already are ok with that outcome and think such a threshold means the party, not the people, can decide who gets the nom (which they can, but that doesn't make it less fucked up)


Bernie would have been saying literally the same thing in their shoes. The option would be entertained if the margin between 1st and 2nd is tiny, like less than 2%.
Ive covered this with you and others at length already and I don't see the value in relitigating it.
 

Addie

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,733
DFW
Friendly reminder that Bernie Sanders' campaign helped write the 2020 primary rules. Or rather, Jeff Weaver, Nina Turner, and Larry Cohen were members of a commission that forced the DNC's hand in eliminating superdelegate voting from the first round of voting.

But I agree that this is incredibly premature.

Anyway, the best thing the Bernie camp can do between now and then is... earn as many delegates as possible. I'm going to assume that was their plan all along.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,290
wherever
Biden ran the laziest fucking campaign of all time. Got blown out in Iowa and NH because he couldn't muster up even the slightest bit of enthusiasm. He didn't know how to fundraise, and got outworked by damn near everyone in the field. He had no presence, marketing, or organization in the ST states. He barely had any volunteers. But in the end none of it mattered because of Clyburn and Reid and Obama and the rest of the party bailing his useless ass out.

Good luck in November, Joe. You're gonna need it. We're all gonna need it.
 

lmcfigs

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,091
I'd be more worried about Bernie losing Super Tuesday. Like why worry about the future when you can worry about what's happening now?
 

Byakuya769

Avenger
Oct 29, 2017
2,718
We can still do this. Super Tuesday will be a blowout even with endorsements. You watch. Bernie's ground game is second to none.

That's the attitude. If Bernie's going to have a Democratic revolution, he can't have his ardent supporters becoming wet noodles over the endorsements from a pack of losers to a candidate in blatant cognitive decline.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
1991 is the majority, not 1990.

Honestly if Bernie has any less than 1900 he'll get robbed tho, very low chances of enough moderates backing him to beat a 100+ delegate defecit.
Ok, if he gets 1,990 he's getting the nom. A lot of the establishment doesn't like him (no shit) and a lot would prefer Biden but acting like he's going to get robbed of the nomination if he has a sizable lead is just not realistic.
 

ChippyTurtle

Banned
Oct 13, 2018
4,773
Do threads get to 100 pages within 3 days normally?

I remain persistent in a unity ticket as the best hope for the party.
 
Dec 31, 2017
7,101
Like when Obama worked his ass off and spent a ridiculous amount of political capital to finally get healthcare reform through even knowing the backlash would be insane?

I'm glad Obama was able to take an incremental step; it says more about he political state of our country that so much effort needed to be expended to achieve that. We need a completely ground up change; but Democrats being the party of "whoa hold on let's not do TOO much now" is getting tiring. Gleefully endorsing the "reach across the aisle to republicans" candidate doesn't inspire much confidence; we will continued to get played by the GOP with this strategy.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
I'm talking about Bernie vs the establishment topic.

Maybe constantly attacking the party you're running in for a primary ends up being a bad idea when the potential coup de grace are the people you constantly attack and shit on end up endorsing the other guy.

Like, everyone was happy when Sanders was attacking "the establishment", when votes were split between half a dozen candidates and Sanders was winning decent victories... now the hard part comes when the game plan of attacking the fucking party starts to backfire when support coalesces around a singular candidate and suddenly it's not fair?

Sanders, for better or worse, made this bed... again. Sanders could have been a more unifying candidate in the party, but he keeps spending time attacking it.

It just find it mind boggling that people never saw this potential outcome coming.

1991 is the majority, not 1990.

Honestly if Bernie has any less than 1900 he'll get robbed tho, very low chances of enough moderates backing him to beat a 100+ delegate defecit.

You don't think Warren would give Sanders her delegates in this outcome?
 

mo60

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,198
Edmonton, Alberta
That's why I put the word in quotation marks. And I believe that she's certainly more moderate and establishment-friendly than Bernie.



It may be too little too late at least for Super Tuesday. At least a few of the States have early voted already. Early Pete and Amy voters got left out cold.
As long as biden can keep the difference between him and bernie around 100 in terms of delegates on ST he should be fine.
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
Its funny that you say this wont happen but then come out and go "well if he had a small lead then maybe things go up in the air". Idk what it is with some people and thinking that you need a certain amount more votes to not have the nom stolen from you, but I assure you, no one is going to look at it that way if they do it other than liberals who already are ok with that outcome and think such a threshold means the party, not the people, can decide who gets the nom (which they can, but that doesn't make it less fucked up)
I don't think it's a good thing if that happens, and I do think that a convention that close basically guarantees Trump wins, but follow the line I was talking about. I'm saying that that is the only circumstance that that even comes up as a possibility, even then it's not assured, and it's even less assured the closer to 50% both candidates are and it's completely out of the question if you're in a 4+% lead environment.
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,680
Ultimately I think people are putting the cart before the horse by resigning to a Bernie loss. I think his message resonates with a large portion of the party and tomorrow will prove that people are hungry for change.
 

Depths

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,512
The DNC really is committed to losing the GE. Trump will completely clown on Biden. It will work too because Biden consistently gives you moments to clown on him.
 
Oct 27, 2017
936
Biden ran the laziest fucking campaign of all time. Got blown out in Iowa and NH because he couldn't muster up even the slightest bit of enthusiasm. He didn't know how to fundraise, and got outworked by damn near everyone in the field. He had no presence, marketing, or organization in the ST states. He barely had any volunteers. But in the end none of it mattered because of Clyburn and Reid and Obama and the rest of the party bailing his useless ass out.

Good luck in November, Joe. You're gonna need it. We're all gonna need it.
We don't know if none of it mattered

Bernie can still very well win tomorrow because he actually put his back into this
 

chase beck

Banned
Jan 3, 2018
1,709
i try to stay away from politics but pokin my head in to say as a young voter seeing biden starting to pull ahead scares the ever living shit out of me.

bernie is not the answer to america's problems but fuck me i will not vote for biden. i wish america was ready for warren
 

Deleted member 18360

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,844
I'll take whatever given, I'm not trying to win a point. All I can do is explain my perspective as well as possible, and if that isn't received well, the best I can hope for is for people to be constructive in their rebuttal.

My constructive rebuttal is that it shows poor faith or argumentative virtue to do the (effectively) historically revisionist thing and level or invert two people with very different records.
 
Mar 9, 2018
3,766
Bernie can still win this. Stop pissing your pants and start pissing on your opponent's political lawns. Vote your *ss off like you're going to lose it.
 

blackw0lf48

Member
Jan 2, 2019
2,970
I'm wondering if Warren was in the position Bernie is in now, with Biden having the same kind of momentum he got after SC, whether we would still be seeing the same kind of coalescing around Biden.
 

soul creator

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,955
It is just hilarious how "never bernie" the moderates are; why are they SO scared? I haven't seen democrats so committed unified to doing something; if they put this much effort actually governing shit we might actually accomplish something.

In bizarro world, there are NY Times articles where the upper levels of the Democratic party power structure being quoted about their strategy to fight against health insurance companies and fossil fuel companies. In this world though, they're all about how to stop the socialist campaigning on guaranteeing health care to everyone, lol.
 
Dec 31, 2017
7,101
Bernie will win tomorrow, it's not doom and gloom, but today has definitely been a damaging day for his campaign. How damaging? Remains to be seen.

Some Bernie supporters are far too weak willed though; gotta persevere and carry on!
 

Teiresias

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,227
And here I thought Bloomberg would be the final boss, instead it's the entire Democratic Party

Fitting

Imagine considering the remaining Democratic electorate of this country that has yet to cast a single ballot in this primary to be a "final boss" in this context. Unbelievable. No wonder a contingent of Bernie supporters push potential supporters away.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,086
You don't think Warren would give Sanders her delegates in this outcome?
The final four candidates are literally the candidates I'd expect to make it to the convention without dropping out even if they had like 80 delegates because they're all so stubborn (Bernie included btw). There would have to be a long talk in a smoke filled room for Bernie and Warren to make ammends and talk out a deal even in that case IMO.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,179

So the party kingmakers won't let Bernie get the nomination even if he's only a few delegates shy of an absolute majority. They'd rather lose with Biden than risk winning with Bernie.

When you have Obama and others running around on the convention floor playing hardball to make sure everyone votes against Bernie it won't be that difficult for them to pull off.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
The final four candidates are literally the candidates I'd expect to make it to the convention without dropping out even if they had like 80 delegates because they're all so stubborn (Bernie included btw). There would have to be a long talk in a smoke filled room for Bernie and Warren to make ammends and talk out a deal even in that case IMO.
Bernie and Warren are much closer than Warren and Biden.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.