• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Barzul

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,965
not cave in to them? that's always been his thing.

it still happens in places like india and france and we did sort of see it happen here, just on a small scale with culinary 226. the leadership clearly wanted to endorse biden but the pro-bernie rank and file kept them from doing it. then when they tried to go against m4a the workers once again broke rank and voted for bernie. its small scale but it at least illustrates what happens when you have the support of workers.
All this assumes that these workers are going to be as engaged in 2021 and onwards as they are in 2020. US History tells me they won't.
 

Nocturne

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,727
i forgot we got things like minimum wage and 40 hour work weeks because people at the top kind of just decided we deserved them instead of continuous agitation and disruption by the working class. thanks for the refresher on us history
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
The precedent is already set
prospect.org

The Day One Agenda

The Next Administration: Using Presidential Power for Good

President Obama inspired a lot of progressive disappointment for often failing to live up to his lofty rhetoric. But a strain of liberal thought defended him by insisting that presidents just weren't that powerful.
Political scientist Brendan Nyhan mocked the mindset of the uninitiated by calling it the Green Lantern Theory of the Presidency, after the DC Comics hero who possessed a ring that gave him near-total power, bound only by his imagination and will.

This is dumb, we shouldn't keep wanting to expanding the Executive Branch's powers. We should be aiming for the Senate, aiming for two more states and securing a legislative stranglehold and ending the filibuster.

This is just a bad idea when better opportunities present itself, the erosion of the Legislature Branch because of political cowardliness is why we're in this mess

Although I guess I'm not shocked that people are literally advocating for Sanders to become a fucking king in order to get his agenda done, and then just going "oh don't worry we'll just turn off the king powers when he leaves no worries"
 

Fat4all

Woke up, got a money tag, swears a lot
Member
Oct 25, 2017
92,598
here
BXqXKMK.png
 
Jan 11, 2018
9,653
Just registered to vote, will be voting for the first time here ever. Also donated money for the first time to a political cause. I could only throw Bernie 15 bucks, but I hope it helps some. Really hoping he does well on Tuesday.
 

eyeball_kid

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,227
I actually completely agree with this on a theoretical level. The abuse and overuse of EOs is inappropriate.

But, the basic reality of the modern GOP's obstructionism makes their use largely necessary for a lot of government functions to operate effectively, and in the case of reversing Trump's EO's, within the bounds of acceptable morality.

If the GOP was a reasonable partner, I would absolutely support the drastic limitation of the power of EOs, even if that meant sometimes liberals weren't able to get everything they wanted on an issue.

The solution to that is not a further descent into authoritarianism by increased executive overreach, but a reform of our democratic institutions -- and end to gerrymandering, election reform, an end to the filibuster, an end to corporate money in politics, among other things would reset the terms of the game. And if we could elect someone who could rebuild the bridges between parties, that'd be a nice cherry on top but not really expecting that.
 

Deleted member 16657

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
10,198
crazy that Pete dropped before ST. hell its crazy that he dropped before Klobuchar or Warren.

Wonder how much that boosts Biden for ST. What a crazy primary so far
 

Eeyore

User requested ban
Banned
Dec 13, 2019
9,029
medicare 4 all is poggers

It's quite a trip to see Pepe used in reaction to M4A while also seeing it on signs and flags from white supremacists. The world is a strange place.

Just registered to vote, will be voting for the first time here ever. Also donated money for the first time to a political cause. I could only throw Bernie 15 bucks, but I hope it helps some. Really hoping he does well on Tuesday.

Awesome, welcome to the madness.
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,257
that may have looked sarcastic, because for some reason I read ! as sarcastic, but I genuinely meant it, I think it's good that you're getting involved to support a cause you believe in.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
The solution to that is not a further descent into authoritarianism by increased executive overreach, but a reform of our democratic institutions -- and end to gerrymandering, election reform, and an end to the filibuster, an end to corporate money in politics, among other things would reset the terms of the game. And if we could elect someone who could rebuild the bridges between parties, that'd be a nice cherry on top but not really expecting that.
Yeah...but that's not happening and the government still exists and massively impact the lives of billions of people every day.

It's either use what few tools we have, or not do anything.
 
Aug 12, 2019
5,159
Also, I'll ask this and see what comes of it because I'm curious. To the people who are so staunchly anti-Bernie until he (IF he does) becomes the nominee and "vote blue no matter who" becomes the practical apparatus by which you would vote for him as a candidate, how do you interpret the greater movement he is inspiring in younger voters and the overall sentiment of his "Not Me, Us" campaign? One of the reasons I'm such a particularly big Bernie supporter is because of that movement and the hope it inspires in me for our future as not only an electorate, but as human beings taking an active role in bettering the lives of everyone around the world to the best of our ability. To me, that movement and overall restoration of faith in the system for a new generation is far more important than Bernie himself, who I'm not so blinded by my respect to see that he does have some flaws such as not being as ideally receptive to more specific issues of minorities as he should be in his broader quest for economic justice (for example, I think his stance on trans rights largely doesn't exist beyond an umbrella equality for LGBTQ+ people) and the fact that his tendency to pivot to his main talking points can leave something to be desired when he's asked more specific questions that should also facilitate a more specific answer. I see those flaws and I'm more than willing to admit he has them, but like I said, his messaging and ability to rally people around a movement is unlike anything I've seen from a modern politician and he hits the nail on the head of "change does not happen from the top down, rather from the bottom up" constantly.

Does it not worry some of the more anti-Bernie people that you're throwing away that movement with someone like Biden being the nominee? Like, whoever has the plurality of voters going into the convention, I'll agree to support because I think that's fair and should be universal across the party, even if it is Biden despite the fact I don't particularly like him as a candidate. But I don't see him as the candidate that is doing much to inspire a base or that is organizing these really big sectors of the young population to get involved in the political spectrum, and that does genuinely scare the hell out of me personally. I think we desperately need to not only address the wide sweeping systemic issues plaguing our country, but also fundamentally reshape how voters interact with the government and the institutions of the US as a whole.

Like I don't expect this movement to wholly fall apart, and I don't actually expect much of the left to fundamentally not vote in protest against someone like Biden in the general, because I think that's mostly online people yelling and trying to earn more leverage than they actually have (which I also think applies to a lot of moderates who are trying to will leftists a similar way to vote more in line with their ideas)... But, I'm just concerned about the longevity of this movement without Sanders as sort of the rallying figure.

I'm not trying to guilt anyone into supporting Sanders with this post, I'm just genuinely asking and also giving my sort of take on things within that question to maybe frame my side of things a little bit if you so choose to answer.
 

fierygunrob

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jan 16, 2018
299
This is dumb, we shouldn't keep wanting to expanding the Executive Branch's powers. We should be aiming for the Senate, aiming for two more states and securing a legislative stranglehold and ending the filibuster.

This is just a bad idea when better opportunities present itself, the erosion of the Legislature Branch because of political cowardliness is why we're in this mess

Although I guess I'm not shocked that people are literally advocating for Sanders to become a fucking king in order to get his agenda done, and then just going "oh don't worry we'll just turn off the king powers when he leaves no worries"
...did you read past the second paragraph? The president ALREADY legally has the ability to do a ton without further expanding on executive powers. And you're goddamn right I'm on board with using existing legal executive powers to tackle climate reform, even if the president shouldn't have had those powers in the first place
 

GoldenEye 007

Roll Tide, Y'all!
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,833
Texas
I mean, I personally believe obviously, Obama should've been kinder to home owners, but it's also important to remember the genesis of the Tea Party began with somebody on CNBC's rant against people who shouldn't have gotten mortgages in the first place getting so-called bailouts. So, while I think that helping the economy in general would be a positive, I also think something far more direct could lead to an even bigger populist right wing backlash against the black President 'bailing out' minority homeowners who 'were given morgages because of affirmative action' or whatever would've been the soundbyte way to blame everything on things like the Community Reinvestment Act, instead of ya' know, the casino that was Wall Street.

Again, I'm not saying this to say that Obama's policy was right, but sometimes even passing the right policy doesn't stop populist backlash, of both the right and left wing variety.
Yeah, I'm sure a level of backlash would have happened. But I wonder if with that more direct personal action, if more people would have been energized to further support him and Dems down ballot after they saw what would have been a large Democratic led government action actually more immediately benefit a wide swath of people. A lot of people had sentiments that they were ignored and left behind - I wonder if that would have been lessened greatly. The downballot losses were especially bad under Obama.
 

Tukarrs

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,814
I dont know who this lady is but i like her.

Marisa Franco 🐜 (@marisa_franco) | Twitter

The latest Tweets from Marisa Franco 🐜 (@marisa_franco). writing a cool catchy twitter bio is on my to-do list. in the meantime, I’m building @conmijente


Marisa Franco is a Latino rights advocate and community organizer. Her activities have centered around Arizona, where she was born, as well as New York and California.[1]

Franco is the co-founder and director of Mijente,[2][3][4] an online organizing tool for Latinx[5] and Chicanx[5] activists.[6][7] Franco led the #Not1MoreDeportation[8] campaign which was recognized in 2014 by the National Organizing Institute as Campaign of the Year.[9] Franco is the Campaign Director at the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON)[10][11][12] where she actively fought against SB1070 which allowed police to ask anyone in Arizona for their immigration paperwork at routine traffic stops.[13]

She was selected as one of The Advocate's 40 under 40 in 2016.[14] She was an organizer with the People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER) in San Francisco, California[15][16] and worked on the campaign to enact the New York Domestic Worker's Bill of Rights.[1]
 

hidys

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
1,794
Klobuchar is almost certainly dropping out after ST even if she wins MN. If Warren doesn't drop then too Bernie will have a serious problem on his hands.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
Also, I'll ask this and see what comes of it because I'm curious. To the people who are so staunchly anti-Bernie until he (IF he does) becomes the nominee and "vote blue no matter who" becomes the practical apparatus by which you would vote for him as a candidate, how do you interpret the greater movement he is inspiring in younger voters and the overall sentiment of his "Not Me, Us" campaign? One of the reasons I'm such a particularly big Bernie supporter is because of that movement and the hope it inspires in me for our future as not only an electorate, but as human beings taking an active role in bettering the lives of everyone around the world to the best of our ability. To me, that movement and overall restoration of faith in the system for a new generation is far more important than Bernie himself, who I'm not so blinded by my respect to see that he does have some flaws such as not being as ideally receptive to more specific issues of minorities as he should be in his broader quest for economic justice (for example, I think his stance on trans rights largely doesn't exist beyond an umbrella equality for LGBTQ+ people) and the fact that his tendency to pivot to his main talking points can leave something to be desired when he's asked more specific questions that should also facilitate a more specific answer. I see those flaws and I'm more than willing to admit he has them, but like I said, his messaging and ability to rally people around a movement is unlike anything I've seen from a modern politician and he hits the nail on the head of "change does not happen from the top down, rather from the bottom up" constantly.

Does it not worry some of the more anti-Bernie people that you're throwing away that movement with someone like Biden being the nominee? Like, whoever has the plurality of voters going into the convention, I'll agree to support because I think that's fair and should be universal across the party, even if it is Biden despite the fact I don't particularly like him as a candidate. But I don't see him as the candidate that is doing much to inspire a base or that is organizing these really big sectors of the young population to get involved in the political spectrum, and that does genuinely scare the hell out of me personally. I think we desperately need to not only address the wide sweeping systemic issues plaguing our country, but also fundamentally reshape how voters interact with the government and the institutions of the US as a whole.

Like I don't expect this movement to wholly fall apart, and I don't actually expect much of the left to fundamentally not vote in protest against someone like Biden in the general, because I think that's mostly online people yelling and trying to earn more leverage than they actually have (which I also think applies to a lot of moderates who are trying to will leftists a similar way to vote more in line with their ideas)... But, I'm just concerned about the longevity of this movement without Sanders as sort of the rallying figure.

I'm not trying to guilt anyone into supporting Sanders with this post, I'm just genuinely asking and also giving my sort of take on things within that question to maybe frame my side of things a little bit if you so choose to answer.

I'm not "never Bernie" or what ever, but the general view is there isn't some greater movement he is creating, the numbers aren't supporting this idea at all and haven't been supported in 2016, 2018, or so far in 2020.

If we were getting record, historic turnout in this primary I would change my tune, but I'm literally seeing no evidence that Sanders is courting a generational shift of young voters that will completely shake up the current political equation.

So no, basically I don't see Sanders as a movement. I see Sanders as a personality candidate with a core group of very hardcore supporters. 2018 was the real litmus test if these people were actually politically motivated for drastic change, and the real litmus test for the political theory that "you just need to run our candidates and we will win in landslides!", only to lose in primaries and basically lose every single moderately competitive state in midterms.

The funny part of 2018 is the real change came from the suburban "moderates" that people in the Sanders camp keep wanting to vote out of office... the people who were the ones politically motivated enough to vote and support the blue wave that netted us 41 House seats and a House majority.
 
Last edited:

Barzul

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,965
Also, I'll ask this and see what comes of it because I'm curious. To the people who are so staunchly anti-Bernie until he (IF he does) becomes the nominee and "vote blue no matter who" becomes the practical apparatus by which you would vote for him as a candidate, how do you interpret the greater movement he is inspiring in younger voters and the overall sentiment of his "Not Me, Us" campaign? One of the reasons I'm such a particularly big Bernie supporter is because of that movement and the hope it inspires in me for our future as not only an electorate, but as human beings taking an active role in bettering the lives of everyone around the world to the best of our ability. To me, that movement and overall restoration of faith in the system for a new generation is far more important than Bernie himself, who I'm not so blinded by my respect to see that he does have some flaws such as not being as ideally receptive to more specific issues of minorities as he should be in his broader quest for economic justice (for example, I think his stance on trans rights largely doesn't exist beyond an umbrella equality for LGBTQ+ people) and the fact that his tendency to pivot to his main talking points can leave something to be desired when he's asked more specific questions that should also facilitate a more specific answer. I see those flaws and I'm more than willing to admit he has them, but like I said, his messaging and ability to rally people around a movement is unlike anything I've seen from a modern politician and he hits the nail on the head of "change does not happen from the top down, rather from the bottom up" constantly.

Does it not worry some of the more anti-Bernie people that you're throwing away that movement with someone like Biden being the nominee? Like, whoever has the plurality of voters going into the convention, I'll agree to support because I think that's fair and should be universal across the party, even if it is Biden despite the fact I don't particularly like him as a candidate. But I don't see him as the candidate that is doing much to inspire a base or that is organizing these really big sectors of the young population to get involved in the political spectrum, and that does genuinely scare the hell out of me personally. I think we desperately need to not only address the wide sweeping systemic issues plaguing our country, but also fundamentally reshape how voters interact with the government and the institutions of the US as a whole.

Like I don't expect this movement to wholly fall apart, and I don't actually expect much of the left to fundamentally not vote in protest against someone like Biden in the general, because I think that's mostly online people yelling and trying to earn more leverage than they actually have (which I also think applies to a lot of moderates who are trying to will leftists a similar way to vote more in line with their ideas)... But, I'm just concerned about the longevity of this movement without Sanders as sort of the rallying figure.

I'm not trying to guilt anyone into supporting Sanders with this post, I'm just genuinely asking and also giving my sort of take on things within that question to maybe frame my side of things a little bit if you so choose to answer.
Mostly because young people don't show up for midterms. Never have probably never will in any significance. I also just don't think Sanders can actually pass any of his major legislative talking points, he'll probably even face resistance from the party he wants to lead unlike say Obama and Trump even. Maybe he's a savvier politician than I've given him credit for but winning is one thing, governing is another. Him not achieving his lofty targets will just broaden the general apathy in American politics and imo lead to a worse right wing backlash than we saw under Obama. I could be absolutely wrong on all these but that's my big hesitancy with Sanders that the high of his movement will fade and they won't show up in 2022. I'll definitely encourage everyone vote for whoever the Democratic nominee though and I'll probably even volunteer to knock on doors here in TX if it looks like it's in play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.