Was Hillary very centric? Wasn't it pretty mich established she lost due to a combination of arrogance and gerrymandering from Republican governors?
Trump won because enough people in the middle wanted "something new" even though it clearly was a bad choice.
Calm down. This is a celebration thread. Only good vibes here.I need evidence that the poster intentionally lied about what the person he was quoting said?
The poster said: "whats the point of this thread if when he loses, you'll blame the "establishment" anyway as the sole reason why he lost"
Which isn't even CLOSE to saying: "so the establishment isn't complicit at all, good to know"
The poster was 100% being disingenuous and manipulative. Full stop. No argument.
You are right. I get a little worked in in political threads as I am autistic and the half truths people say to push narratives often get me worked up.Calm down. This is a celebration thread. Only good vibes here.
I wouldn't go that far, honestly. Unless I'm missing something, no one actually lied. It was only a few days (two, iirc) Sanders' spokesperson when asked why it wasn't revealed sooner: "that's the moment when the most accurate and up-to-date summary could be given by doctors." Which is fine, imo.
That would be the correct assumptionI have a sinking feeling warren and sanders are going to split the anti-establishment dem vote and leave us with Biden.
Not if he can't put a dent in Biden's African-American support. So far no one's been able to do that. I wish someone would, but Iowa doesn't matter if it doesn't change that dynamic.Bernie's taking Iowa and no one's stopping them after that.
Let's go.
ONE OF US. ONE OF US.Everybody be nice to Tall4Life he is young and dumb but we will make a comrade out of him yet
I think Sanders will take the first four primaries. The momentum will be huge if that comes to pass, and that could be what does it.Not if he can't put a dent in Biden's African-American support. So far no one's been able to do that. I wish someone would, but Iowa doesn't matter if it doesn't change that dynamic.
I disagree with this on a political level, but we don't even need to get into that - that's not how it's gonna go down simply because of how the primaries are structured. Momentum is too important, and the voting doesn't happen all at once. If there was a split within a single ideological group, it'd eventually be resolved with a focus on a single candidate between the two over the course of the voting season.I have a sinking feeling warren and sanders are going to split the anti-establishment dem vote and leave us with Biden.
Right now he's DOA in South Carolina. It's like a 24 point gap on the aggregate. There's going to need to be a GIGANTIC shift in the African-American vote for anyone to take that primary. And right now New Hampshire is a nailbiter in terms of polling. I'm not exactly getting my hopes up.I think Sanders will take the first four primaries. The momentum will be huge if that comes to pass, and that could be what does it.
I also think the chances of Biden crumbling continue to grow each time another candidate drops out. People like Buttigieg will eventually have to attack Biden to steal voters from them to continue scraping by.
If there was a split within a single ideological group, it'd eventually be resolved with a focus on a single candidate between the two over the course of the voting season
He's not winning SC, but the other three are certainly possible.I think Sanders will take the first four primaries. The momentum will be huge if that comes to pass, and that could be what does it.
I also think the chances of Biden crumbling continue to grow each time another candidate drops out. People like Buttigieg will eventually have to attack Biden to steal voters from them to continue scraping by.
I disagree with this on a political level, but we don't even need to get into that - that's not how it's gonna go down simply because of how the primaries are structured. Momentum is too important, and the voting doesn't happen all at once. If there was a split within a single ideological group, it'd eventually be resolved with a focus on a single candidate between the two over the course of the voting season.
Biden might still take it, of course, but that's definitely not gonna be the reason if it does.
Full story inside on Politico
It's a interesting development to see. Who knows what the horse race will look like when primaries start in 2 months.
Eh, still a long way until the voting starts.
But I think there's a reasonable argument that if Sanders loses vs. Trump it's very likely Biden (or Buttigieg or Warren) would have as well, and I'd rather have Sanders lead the charge than the others. Can still stomach plenty of other candidates still in, though; I'm not a buster.
Don't apologize. Everything you were saying was 100% right. And I say this as someone who will be voting for Bernie in the primaries.You are right. I get a little worked in in political threads as I am autistic and the half truths people say to push narratives often get me worked up.
I am glad Biden doesn't have this thing lock up.
The guy is going to do it.Bernie's taking Iowa and no one's stopping them after that.
Let's go.
So you're gonna vote Sanders over Biden? Assuming those are the only likely choices in your state when it comes time to vote.I mean, total honesty, I'm really hoping someone other than Biden wins. I've got issues with all of the candidates, but I'd really prefer not to have to hold my nose and vote for Biden in the general. At this point, the primary just feels a lot like the 2016 GOP primary. There's a candidate with an important chunk of the electorate on lock and everyone else is just waiting for them to screw up instead of attacking because they want to grab that support.
Welcome to the team!I've accepted it at this point, to be honest.
I wish him well in the general, our court system depends on it. Apart from that, he'll be slightly easier to tune out than Trump, especially once reality hits his supporters.
Please stop.
If that's the choice by the time it gets to NY? Yup. If you thought otherwise then you really don't know me at all.So you're gonna vote Sanders over Biden? Assuming those are the only likely choices in your state when it comes time to vote.
Please stop.
(I do have to say, as much as we disagree and butt heads, you're probably my favorite Sanders stan, lol)
Sorry, didn't mean to assume.If that's the choice by the time it gets to NY? Yup. If you thought otherwise then you really don't know me at all.
Have a feeling it's all going to be done and dusted by the time I get to vote though. I'm pretty late in the cycle this time.
(I do have to say, as much as we disagree and butt heads, you're probably my favorite Sanders stan, lol)
LMAO. You actually engaged me and we discussed in another thread. You're good people.
Oh stop now, you're good people too.
Thanks Buddy.Please stop.
(I do have to say, as much as we disagree and butt heads, you're probably my favorite Sanders stan, lol)
My issues with Bernie have always been his history on gun control, his pivoting to generalized income inequality on every single issue, and his need to put his foot in his mouth when it comes to race.
That's true, but my hope is his campaign will make socialism seem less crazy than we have been educated to believe in this country.Being painted with the Socialist paintbrush is going to hurt. Trump is going to do so much damn fear mongering.
My issues with Bernie have always been his history on gun control, his pivoting to generalized income inequality on every single issue, and his need to put his foot in his mouth when it comes to race.
Like I said, I got issues with everyone this cycle.
My issues with Bernie have always been his history on gun control, his pivoting to generalized income inequality on every single issue, and his need to put his foot in his mouth when it comes to race.
Like I said, I got issues with everyone this cycle.