That MGSV was a success in sales doesn't change the fact that their video game division had effectively become Kojima's personal playground for hyper-expensive pet projects.
while true, it doesn't change the fact its still super corny
Konami has actually been more profitable ever since they dumped Kojima.
Cool, how does it work for a refund? Do you call Sony or is it through on line chat? I've never asked for a refund from them.
I'm not hating on this game, but it kills me that we didn't get the InFamous Vita game that they pitched.
Email or call or both.
Right. Still way smaller than GG, a behemoth who made AAA high end console titles
Konami doesn't care. We're not privy to what went on behind closed doors, but I'm not going to pretend that Kojima was blameless in his falling out with the company. The only thing that matters to Konami at this point is that they're doing better financially now than they were with Kojima making Hollywood blockbusters. That they're mostly a gambling machine/health club company at this point is beside the point.
Konami doesn't care about video game critical acclaim. If they did, they'd have a deeper investment in video games than they currently do.
I gues he played it a lot more since to where the flaws became a lot more apparent.
I'm all good. The Sony rep was fantastic and the funds are back in my wallet. Refund processed.
Not true. It was known that Konami forced Kojima to keep working on MGS games. Ever since MGS 3 or 4, Kojima kept saying in interviews that he would like to work on something new. Also, regarding his games, it was also said (by insiders) that Kojima's games were often, if not always, on budget.
Didn't you say the game would be getting 72 or something? :P
I hope youre joking now. Games that reviewed well like Ubi open worlds, RDR 2 and W3 are reviewed well because they range from good to fantastic to all time greats, not because its specifically targeted towards critics. if that was the case those same games would not be praised on the internet, would not get accolades from user voting. And production quality is only one the ingredients , ubi games rely on systemic open world design , gameplay loops and rewards. RDR 2 and W3 as much as they rely on presentation , without stellar writing theyre nothing . And majority of people considered those same games unforgettable experiences, flaws and all. So I have no idea where are you coming from
For me it was when you gave the worst Uncharted game a 10.
