Its very necessary since they dont function at all like zombies .They are more mutants then anything.
Ok, if you say so.
Its very necessary since they dont function at all like zombies .They are more mutants then anything.
gotcha ;)are you for real man, look at the textures on that dudes leather jacket this game is going to be lit
to be fair you're working on the game (correct me if i'm wrong) so you can't really be unbiased. i don't think most of the people who are super hyped for it are expecting a 90+ metascoreI mean obviously it's impossible to predict for sure, but I believe it has that potential, that's all.
Horizon Zero Dawn was the worst and the most hilarious on release day. Days Gone "concern" is about 5% on the HZD scale.
People are more cautious these days and with good reason.
well it has the same exact score on opencritic so no.To be fair though it would've been if not for a couple low ball scores from a couple sites that count a lot in the MC average.
it's a tryhard move, i agree.Still can't get over insisting on calling Zombies "Freakers". So unimaginative and unnecessary.
I expect a solid 85 for Days Gone.
Day One!, I hope We can read the previews soon.
One has 115 reviews the other has 156. Not the same at all. Pretty sure if you take the GameCritics, Quarter to Three and US Gamer review away it goes to a 90 on MC.
I don't see how that is unnecessary.I am slowly coming around to this game and almost getting hyped for it. Really impressed with what they are doing here. Still can't get over insisting on calling Zombies "Freakers". So unimaginative and unnecessary.
That's not going to happen dude. Expect 80+ and you'll be happy at the end.
That trailer is back to 30fps now I would not expect that to be honest.
you're making things too complicated, that's not how average scores work. you said metacritic's method and giving more weight to certain site has made it get the 89, but it also has an 89 on opencritic. all games get higher averages if you take out the more negative scores. that's a pointless argument.One has 115 reviews the other has 156. Not the same at all. Pretty sure if you take the GameCritics, Quarter to Three and US Gamer review away it goes to a 90 on MC.
One of the biggest console warriors on here calling someone else biased. Hilarious.gotcha ;)
to be fair you're working on the game (correct me if i'm wrong) so you can't really be unbiased. i don't think most of the people who are super hyped for it are expecting a 90+ metascore
that someone else is actually localizing the game, and he didn't object, you don't need to do it for him.One of the biggest console warriors on here calling someone else biased. Hilarious.
One of the biggest console warriors on here calling someone else biased. Hilarious.
Go to Opencritic and average up the scores they share with Metacritic then. Only way to tell. I'm just saying I seem to remember Horizon having a 90 on MC until a couple of those low 6's dropped. We've seen that happen for a lot of games. Pretty sure the Gamecritics review or Washington Post review alone caused Uncharted 4 to drop from a 94 to a 93 on Metacritic.you're making things too complicated, that's not how average scores work. you said metacritic's method and giving more weight to certain site has made it get the 89, but it also has an 89 on opencritic. all games get higher averages if you take out the more negative scores. that's a pointless argument.
sure, when you can't actually counter the points someone makes call him a console warrior. sad. i'm out.
I am slowly coming around to this game and almost getting hyped for it. Really impressed with what they are doing here. Still can't get over insisting on calling Zombies "Freakers". So unimaginative and unnecessary.
well it has the same exact score on opencritic so no.
it's a tryhard move, i agree.
That doesn't make you an arbiter of who is biased and who isn't. Not with the shit you commonly spew in Days Gone threads.that someone else is actually localizing the game, and he didn't object, you don't need to do it for him.
Ppl probably had a problem with clickers too I assume. Ah wellI honestly don't know why folks get hung up on this. It's an in-universe name for the enemies. Why does it bother folks that this universe uses a different name than another one?
You missed The Last of Us man! That's exactly what you're describing there in the first sentence!finally, a zombie survival game that uses more than one button and has actual gameplay to it. none of that movie, cutscene galore bullshit. still can't believe it's a Sony title
day one brehs
i liked the name clickers because they made weird clicking noisesPpl probably had a problem with clickers too I assume. Ah well
Yeah, they remind me of the Darkseekers in "I Am Legend", which is a very good thing since I adore that movie. In the end though, they are still zombies to me :)I don't see how that is unnecessary.
These "zombies" need to eat, drink, sleep and can even build nests. They are inteligent (not as much as a human but more like animals). They also have different types that are stronger compared to the "normal" ones and even some that are weaker than the average freaker which means there is even cannibalism in their society.
If anything they are more like vampires but that still wouldn't make sense because vampires drink blood and these don't.
i liked the name clickers because they made weird clicking noises
I do call them zombies too when I describe the game to people but if I go in detail I call them the in universe name because they are way too different from other zombies.Yeah, they remind me of the Darkseekers in "I Am Legend", which is a very good thing since I adore that movie. In the end though, they are still zombies to me :)
freak ass freakers
I guess that whole post was trolling The Last of Us.You missed The Last of Us man! That's exactly what you're describing there in the first sentence!
If it's good, why not? Last zombie game we got was a 91 metacriticgotcha ;)
to be fair you're working on the game (correct me if i'm wrong) so you can't really be unbiased. i don't think most of the people who are super hyped for it are expecting a 90+ metascore
They did. It was silly then and it's silly now. Im glad creators don't consult with the general public on details like this lol.Ppl probably had a problem with clickers too I assume. Ah well
I know ;) Subtlety doesn't seem to be one of the poster's strongest suits.
Why does it matter? Not like you are a fan of Horizon or God of War. You have already made up your mind about this game long ago.Well... I just don't see how this game could achieve what GOW and Horizon did with being games at the pinnacle of their respective genres and studios. This seems disappointing in comparison to Sony's other studios.