I'm not sure why people feel D&D should be granted immunity from facing any kind of public questioning regarding their work
"granted immunity"
the phrasing is so telling. Like a crime. Like a judge
I'm not sure why people feel D&D should be granted immunity from facing any kind of public questioning regarding their work
While I do agree that it's nice if creators respected their fans and offer explanations, at some point artistic choice is artistic choice and there's nothing else anyone can really do about it. At most, they would shrug their shoulders and say, "this is the way we felt it should end". People are free to call them hack writers, but fans have to cut their loss at some point and realize that they're not going to get anything out of this. Given the response they've received, I'm sure D&D heard everything loud and clear already.I've seen a few in this very thread with variations of people wanting to ask them difficult questions to paint them into a corner and they shouldn't have to deal with that.
Your own assertion of "the show is over, move on. No one is entitled to an explanation" is also implying that writers/directors/showrunners should be free from any discussion as once a show has aired then we [fans] should move on.
I'm sure some want a public shaming [walking them naked through the streets with someone following them with a bell?] but the vast majority of fans of the show who watched the quality drop over season 8 (i don't see the problem with season 7 in isolation, but in context it was the start of the decline) would like to opportunities to discuss it, not just the cookie cutter responses in magazines or their woeful own explanation show following each episodes. I mean even their own explanation show pulled the final episode which covered the finale because even they must have known some of their choices were questionable.
If these show runners and cast members are holding these panels why can't people ask questions? Or should even they get over it and move on since the show is over?
If they hadn't received death threats i'd be surprised since you just need to fart the wrong direction and you get them on Twitter, although i do question the sincerity of some like "just die" etc, but still not right at all nobody should have to face real or childish threats
What a bunch of cowards leaving the actors having to deal with questions that only they can answer
I don't think that's going to be my reaction for when that happens. More like a sad facepalming expression.Imagine the hate after they will screw up SW even more than now.
Just don't watch their SW movies. Simple as that.I don't think that's going to be my reaction for when that happens. More like a sad facepalming expression.
The fact you think the Mad Queen Dany plotline took place in a single episode and wasn't forshadowed all season long and even hinted at in previous seasons shows me just how far apart we are from agreeing or finding common ground. So like I said before. Agree to disagree."Mad Queen Dany" could be a theory D&D co-opted onto their show to get to the ending as quick as possible. Like there was no build up, nothing. She hears some bells, goes mad and then burns down KL. Mad Queen Dany started and ended in one episode - an easy solution to kill off the character and end her story.
I don't think that's GRRM's take on the character because that would make his story entirely nihilistic - the moral being that people cannot grow beyond what bigoted society thinks of them. Dany could not escape her father's fate, despite being a far better person, ended up going mad because of genes and that's it. Bastard Jon was a traitor - precisely what Westeros said he would be because bastards are born of lust and hence traitorous. He too cannot escape his birth. Arya thought she would never fit in because she was a lady and she did not. She had to leave Westeros. Sansa betrayed her family to become queen in book one and she ends up being queen by again betraying her brother.
That's just not the story GRRM is telling IMO. Jon himself is going to be a fundamentally different character in book 6 - more or less a fire wight. Arya will be a master politician adept in languages and poisons. Book Bran is an entirely different, central character and the prince/lord of winterfell. Dany will no doubt burn KL, kill thousands and then get redemption up North - she has a lot of parallels to Stannis. And above all the primary antagonist in the books is the Others - not stupid Cersei.
The show itself hinted at this ending in the house of the undying vision that Dany sees in season 2. She first sees a burned down throne room, then hears the cry from beyond the wall and goes there to the afterlife with Dhrogo and the child. Somewhere D&D changed the order probably to have Lena Headey/Cersei stick around longer after rushing and finishing off the WW/AOTD story in one episode.
Prophecies like 'Nissa-Nissa' is still a thing in the book - where the PTWP sticks a sword into the person he loves and forges lightbringer. It's very possible that Jon does kill Dany similarly - but for a different reason and Dany willingly makes the sacrifice to defeat the Others.
On the show, they discarded all the prophecies, mythology, legends everything and finished off the central premise of the books - the AOTD - halfway through the season. Then they decided to focus on Cersei as the big bad and once again the game of thrones. Basically the entire story changes after that and Jon has to kill Dany for entirely different reasons...
👏👏👏👏👏 Well said. No wonder they didn't want to perform. No one would.Yeah let's blame the showrunners for this cancellation instead of the millions and millions of raging, entitled whiny assholes on the internet who want to role play as Tom Cruise from A Few Good Men.
I was talking about my reaction about the manbabies crying on the internet and threatening the people in charge.
HBO was willing to give them 2-3 more full length seasons to wrap it up properly.
They chose to move on and make a Star War instead. It was not a matter of them doing what they could with what they had.
They had the number of episodes they wanted to make well before they were asked to do Star Wars. The two things were not related.
The first time they announced GoT would end around 70 episodes was in May 2015. TFA wasn't released until December. B&W announced their Confederate show in 2017, they probably hadn't agreed to do Star Wars until after that controversy.
Honestly I agree with you about the coster waldau incident and think that's a far better example to use. But using some curse words on an internet forum and thinking the writers should give an explanation as to what happened doesnt really come close to any kind of behavior i would consider worrisome.I disagree that personal insults and demanding an explanation for the ending, leaps of logic like blaming the showrunners because some antisocial fans were following Coster Waldau around getting a coffee, slamming their 'egos' because they want to work on Star Wars, well not a more calm way to take in the aftermath of a popular TV show. Sure these examples not death threats but to be honest, it's hardly flattering.
Oh the audacity of having a q and a with the showrunners for the final season of the most popular tv show in the world at a popular culuture conventionYeah let's blame the showrunners for this cancellation instead of the millions and millions of raging, entitled whiny assholes on the internet who want to role play as Tom Cruise from A Few Good Men.
Oh the audacity of having a q and a with the showrunners for the final season of the most popular tv show in the world at a popular culuture convention
Oh how will the rich white men continue to survive after being asked questions about a tv show. They must be protected from the savagery of nerds dressed as the khaleesi
Please miss me with this shit
Are they even still a go?
Have you ever actually seen a comic con panel or are you just imagining a horde of people just jumping on to the stage and screaming in their facesMy bad. I didn't realize they deserved a bunch of whiny babies screaming at them because they were white dudes. Carry on.
Iger reconfirmed when the backlash was still fresh lol.
Only white dudes would think shit like Confederate are good idea
When it became one of their next projects. You dont think people are going to wonder about it after all of the dumb racially insensitive shit they did even in season 8 of game of thrones?
I don't get your point.This thread really is sticking to made up narrative that "crazed fanboiiis would be just lurking in bushes with baseball bats and shitty questions to hurt D&D anyways and nothing else" huh?
Even if we take step back and just say argument is that writers / showrunners shouldn't need to face any Q&A about their productions from their fans then why to have any panels like this for fans? For anything, ever if writers are beyond reproach?
This thread really is sticking to made up narrative that "crazed fanboiiis would be just lurking in bushes with baseball bats and shitty questions to hurt D&D anyways and nothing else" huh?
Even if we take step back and just say argument is that writers / showrunners shouldn't need to face any Q&A about their productions from their fans then why to have any panels like this for fans? For anything, ever if writers are beyond reproach?
It's a post-mortem Q&A for a entertainment product people paid money for. People, who are also paying to be at Comic-Con, are well within their rights to ask them whatever they want as long as they aren't rude about it.I don't get your point.
You think asking questions at a panel is the same as lobbing criticism and or shooting expletive?
It's not supposed to be an exam or an inquisition or something.
Yes, exactly.It's a post-mortem Q&A for a entertainment product people paid money for. People, who are also paying to be at Comic-Con, are well within their rights to ask them whatever they want as long as they aren't rude about it.
"Did you watch X-Men: The Last Stand and think that would be a great way to end the Jon/Dany storyline?" would be kind of rude.
90% of the discussions on this forum can be boiled down to "it's just a tv show/movie/video game". Bringing this up because there is a large amount of criticisms being levied at one of the biggest shows of all time ever is beyond silly, here of all places. Its a nothing statement that's dismissive of any conversation revolving around criticism.I can think of many things I'd rather do than sit in a sweaty room with a bunch of Thrones fans, so I don't really blame them.
As for the backlash, let the angry mob of entitled twats shriek into the void. It's just a fucking TV show.
I can think of many things I'd rather do than sit in a sweaty room with a bunch of Thrones fans, so I don't really blame them.
As for the backlash, let the angry mob of entitled twats shriek into the void. It's just a fucking TV show.
If these guys are getting legit death threats and/or are being subjected to constant personal attacks because people don't like their handling of a TV show about dragons and zombies, then yes, it is entirely appropriate to inject some basic perspective into the discussion. I will happily dismiss any and all criticisms of a work of fiction before being okay with actual human beings getting attacked over it.90% of the discussions on this forum can be boiled down to "it's just a tv show/movie/video game". Bringing this up because there is a large amount of criticisms being levied at one of the biggest shows of all time ever is beyond silly, here of all places. Its a nothing statement that's dismissive of any conversation revolving around criticism.
Ok?
People should be dismissive of what passes as criticism in many of these discussions. It's a lot of people making shitty comments and continuing to act like either 1) they're still owed something, or 2) something needs to happen so that writers are "held accountable".90% of the discussions on this forum can be boiled down to "it's just a tv show/movie/video game". Bringing this up because there is a large amount of criticisms being levied at one of the biggest shows of all time ever is beyond silly, here of all places. Its a nothing statement that's dismissive of any conversation revolving around criticism.
Hypothetical death threats notwithstanding, were using extremes to act like the entirety of criticisms being used here and fans wanting D&D to talk about the ending is tantamount to death threats and other toxic behavior. Which at least here isnt happening and I havent read anything so extreme like the examples youre giving in most places either.If these guys are getting legit death threats and/or are being subjected to constant personal attacks because people don't like their handling of a TV show, then yes, it is entirely appropriate to inject some basic perspective into the discussion. I will happily dismiss any and all criticisms of a work of fiction before being okay with actual human beings getting attacked over it.
Ok?
People wanting to hear their thought processes and decision making isnt the same as people wanting to hold a public stoning of these individuals.People should be dismissive of what passes as criticism in many of these discussions. It's a lot of people making shitty comments and continuing to act like either 1) they're still owed something, or 2) something needs to happen so that writers are "held accountable".
It's insane. It's insane that someone told you a story, and you didn't like it, and your reaction to that is thinking that someone needs to be "held accountable". It's people telling stories! No crime was committed. It's people making up dragon stories to entertain people, and they came up short. That is not an offense that needs to be swelled upon.
"Someone told you a story" as if this was handed out for free on street corners.People should be dismissive of what passes as criticism in many of these discussions. It's a lot of people making shitty comments and continuing to act like either 1) they're still owed something, or 2) something needs to happen so that writers are "held accountable".
It's insane. It's insane that someone told you a story, and you didn't like it, and your reaction to that is thinking that someone needs to be "held accountable". It's people telling stories! No crime was committed. It's people making up dragon stories to entertain people, and they came up short. That is not an offense that needs to be swelled upon.
Paying money to watch a show doesn't mean you're owed satisfaction, it means you're owed getting to see a show. Grow up."Someone told you a story" as if this was handed out for free on street corners.
And in turn said show runners publicly airing show for all to see means they can listen to criticism about it. Thats the thing about making your art public, you open yourself and the art up for feedback, both positive and negativePaying money to watch a show doesn't mean you're owed satisfaction, it means you're owed getting to see a show. Grow up.
You're free to give your feedback, but they're not obligated to listen. They were paid by HBO to write a show and they did. End of story.And in turn said show runners publicly airing show for all to see means they can listen to criticism about it. Thats the thing about making your art public, you open yourself and the art up for feedback, both positive and negative
It's a consumer product. People have a right to complain about the quality of it.Paying money to watch a show doesn't mean you're owed satisfaction, it means you're owed getting to see a show. Grow up.
imagine posting something like this
Paying money to watch a show doesn't mean you're owed satisfaction, it means you're owed getting to see a show. Grow up.
They seems like an utter waste of time for all involved then.Lol have you people ever watched SDCC panels for popular shows before. These things are only about the guests fucking around and telling the audience how awesome everything is.