I was just thinking the same thing — I haven't seen it in a while but I'm pretty sure the second film made it clear the zombies didn't have a long expectancy and died out after a while.
I named it "28 months later" just because it's kind of a fan tittle that has been running for a while now.
I did read before posting. So what? They are talking and have ideas, that qualifies as "working on". I never said it's being filmed already.
- Yeh this is pretty much what the film makes out. The outbreak isn't a thing that could last forever, because they a) weren't really undead b) don't reproduce outside of infecting others c) aren't sustained by any supernatural means and would succumb to starvation / bodily harm / deterioration.
I like the "small" scale of the outbreak in the first two movies and hope they don't overdo it with the 3rd. I'd like to see a movie set in universe where competent governments have managed to hold a line somewhere in central Europe. It's a tenuous line, but after two years of conflict the infected are beginning to dwindle in numbers after France was overrun in a matter of weeks. But I'm not sure where the tension would come from. So I see them reconning the infection and introducing a mutation- sort of like they did in 28 Weeks.
It burned out in days because infected can't swim and the virus is too fast acting for infected people to bring it across. It was limited to the island, basically. In weeks that kid was a carrier and spread it to Paris so there's no telling how far it'll go
How dare you question Idris Elba's methods. He canceled the apocalypse!
I meant at the end of 28 weeks later, it spread to Paris.
