-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
I'd be shocked if they developed a AAA next-gen title in-house, given the skeleton crew that works there.
Were the last few games they made worthwhile? I swear i haven heard anything about them since ryse.
Is that true? Wikipedia claims they have 290 employees still (based on https://www.gameswirtschaft.de/wirtschaft/groesste-spiele-entwickler-deutschland-2020/)
Another Crysis game seemed pretty inevitable, especially given the re-release of 1.
Yeah, Ryse only really needed more depth to it's combat to be a great game.
Yeah, Ryse only really needed more depth to it's combat to be a great game.
Last edited:
Guess that Lumberyard sale was way more lucrative for them than I expected. I would hate to see Crytek be relegated to strictly a GAAS dev (though Showdown is brilliant) so hopeful Ryse 2 becomes a thing.
I thought EA owned it but the remaster says the copyrights and whatnot belong to Crytek so I think they reverted or were bought back or something. EA didn't publish the remaster.
I never brought an Xbox One. Can you tell me what appeals to you with this game? To me, it always looked so bland and someone who actually played it might point out it's competencies :)
What I wouldn't give for a RYSE sequel fully-fleshed out and developed with Series X in mind.
HNNNNNGGGG
HNNNNNGGGG
Fortunately for the IP, Son of Rome ended in a way where they can basically do whatever with a Ryse 2. I'd be shocked if they didn't try a new approach after the mediocre reception it received.
As someone who didn't own an Xbox one but is getting an Xbox Series X, I would love a patch for Ryse to take advantage of the higher resolutions and frame rates of the XSX. I know the game was already a looker so at 4k60 I'm sure it will hold it's own with most games out there now.
I would like a Ryse sequel. Not many games set in the Roman Republic or Empire that aren't strategy games.
I don't get the love for it in this thread. It was very mediocre in every possible aspect except the graphics.
The presentation was quite amateurish and made the gameplay and encounter design feel even worse.
It's available on Steam btw, that's how I played it.
Yeah sorry I should have added I was mainly referring to the visuals. To this day it's still a looker and one of the graphical showcases of current gen for me. Having said that, while the combat was ultimately rather shallow and the story fairly short I still had a tonne of fun with it and was seemingly one of the few people who really enjoyed the MP arena side of it too
As others have pointed out, a fully fleshed sequel could be something very special!
A Ryse sequel could be great, so I hope the rumours are true. Yes, the original was average, but it did begin development as a 360 Kinect title, that was then switched to be an X1 release that had to keep the Kinect controls. Being free of Kinect alone could lead to a sequel being much better.
Ryse was pretty good in its highest difficulty setting. That being said, I wouldn't be mad if they remove the repetitive QTE combat and replace it with a souls like combat.
Crytek self-published Crysis Remaster so I guess not. At least not currently.
I hope they decide to return to a Crysis single player campaign in the vein of 1 & warhead. I absolutely adore those games .
This was my first reaction to seeing this list. I loved Ryse.
Yup:
"3. Intellectual Property Rights CRYSIS and all copyrights, trademarks, and all other intellectual property rights related thereto are owned by CRYTEK and are protected by German and international copyright law and other applicable law. Licensee shall have no ownership or intellectual property rights in or to CRYSIS, including, without limitation, all copyrights related thereto. "
Good find. Actually, looking at the back of my original 2007 DVD case, it says the same thing, so EA never owned the rights to the franchise.
