Can't say I'm shocked that people from developed countries are defending these prices. It's not like they care about what happens to us, really.
I mean, Sony has nothing to do with it. Blame it on a country that imposes crazy taxes to imports.
Sony has lots of anticonsumer policies, probably the company that has the most, but this is not one of them, and Barlog is crearly not slamming Sony.
EDIT: man, I'm reading the tweets and OP and that id just silly, is Playstation going to charge you, I don't know, 200€ for something that costs 500€ to manufacture just because you live in a poor country? Videogames and software is different matter, but hardware? Plain stupid.
Maybe not base pricing on a loss leader luxury product based on the minimum wage in a 3rd world country?
This is the fakest of fake outrage...the last thing Brazil needs is to focus on making a dedicated video game machine affordable...are some of you serious??? Maybe the minimum wage is so low because Brazil has other serious problems besides being able to afford a new system within ONE YEAR of release...
Can't say I'm shocked that people from developed countries are defending these prices. It's not like they care about what happens to us, really.
That's why in Brazil is pretty common to see Bootleg Sega consoles, because they're made in Brazil and is a lot cheaper to buy.
Thread title is quite sensational... for all we know, Cory is well aware of the super high tariffs in Brazil and those are the "bullshit" he is referring to. He doesn't slam Playstation anywhere.
They were not bootleg consoles. TecToy was (and as far as i know still is) licensed by sega to do... whatever they wanted with sega property, basically. And it paid off.
Yeah, was my mistake. They're not bootleg consoles, but licensed.They were not bootleg consoles. TecToy was (and as far as i know still is) licensed by sega to do... whatever they wanted with sega property, basically. And it paid off.
"also, to be clear, I mean it is bullshit they cost that much and price is not adjusted accordingly per region"
I don't know who else besides PlayStation he could be talking about here.
That's...kinda incredible. I've never heard of someone licensing out their consoles, especially not with that much freedom. Guess Brazil was the perfect environment to test that arrangement out, and Sega the perfect company.
For everyone saying that the problems it's the taxes, I can mostly agree on that, but why in the Xone/PS4 era we had at launch:
2013 Dollar -> $1 = R$2,40 (good times)
Xbox One w/Kinect:
USA Price: $500
Converted price wo/taxes: R$1200
Price with Taxes: R$2200
PS4:
USA Price: $400
Converted price wo/taxes: R$960
Price with Taxes: R$4000
Even counting the taxes, how MS could sell Xones at almost half of the price as the console was pricier than PS4? What MS did differently?
I don't know who else besides PlayStation he could be talking about here.
Microsoft produced xboxes in Zona Franca till the X1 (industrial complex in Manaus). Thats how they skirted around the taxes.
For everyone saying that the problems it's the taxes, I can mostly agree on that, but why in the Xone/PS4 era we had at launch:
2013 Dollar -> $1 = R$2,40 (good times)
Xbox One w/Kinect:
USA Price: $500
Converted price wo/taxes: R$1200
Price with Taxes: R$2200
PS4:
USA Price: $400
Converted price wo/taxes: R$960
Price with Taxes: R$4000
Even counting the taxes, how MS could sell Xones at almost half of the price as the console was pricier than PS4? What MS did differently?
That, of course, is a necessity. But it doesn't excuse a better price. And no, I don't fall for the idea that it doesn't maker business sense. If people didn't buy these devices at such a high price, they'd reduce. To be clear, I'm blaming both rich people who pay these prices and the companies who are okay with only letting rich people be their audience.Well, on hardware, a PS5 with disc drive was launched here at US$ 341. So, you know, isn't really much more to do or say, other than reform the whole country really.
"also, to be clear, I mean it is bullshit they cost that much and price is not adjusted accordingly per region"
I don't know who else besides PlayStation he could be talking about here.
Microsoft produced xboxes in Zona Franca till the X1 (industrial complex in Manaus). Thats how they skirted around the taxes.
Because the Xbox One was manufactured here from the start. The PS4 would become a nationalized product only in 2015.
That, of course, is a necessity. But it doesn't excuse a better price. And no, I don't fall for the idea that it doesn't maker business sense. If people didn't buy these devices at such a high price, they'd reduce. To be clear, I'm blaming both rich people who pay these prices and the companies who are okay with only letting rich people be their audience.
These companies have the means to make a profit with both hardware and software.
Do they sell Xbox officially there? I had to buy my Series X here in Peru through a store that imported it.In my country (Chile), PS5 digital version costs the same as xbox series X and Ps5 with disk is approximately 120 dollars more expensive.
Ya that sounds about right, just sucks that they can't do this before launch so that Brazilians can game at an affordable cost.They did exaclty that with the PS4. But I don't see they doing this right now, maybe in a few years time.
Hardware? Our taxes are a fairly convoluted and regressive affair that seeks to penalize expenditure rather than capital and were actually designed to hinder imported goods as a way to make local products more competitive, but this policy never worked - specially for tech - due to all sorts of complicated reasons. Plus, R$ is weak nowadays against US$.
Games? That's on Sony.
They could make the consoles here instead of importing, to begin with. They choose not to.Selling a PS5 here, at US$ 341, is selling it US$ 150 cheaper than you get elsewhere. And Sony is taking and even bigger loss, because in this US$ 341 are the seller margin, logistics and marketing costs. Now, add to that the fact that they are still losing money selling it at US$ 499 elsewhere.
I don't see how much more they could cut. Do you? How much do you think they should charge? US$ 100?
Want to blame them for software prices? Fair game, Sony could very well adjust prices to our market.
They could make the consoles here instead of importing, to begin with. They choose not to.
We have to stop with these blatant lies based on 1st world guilt...a $500 dedicated videogame machine that Sony takes a loss on isn't a luxury product? Those other items you mentioned are WAY more important, and widely cheap and available. Also...taxing luxury goods is a socialist core ideal. And "foreign sports cars" are cheaper than you think, and can avoid taxes via grey market reselling (it's why Cuba has such a great car culture).
So yeah...all those things still can be luxury products. Last time I checked, PS4 and Xbox Ones still work...but let's act like it's some human right for everyone to have anything they want immediately! Literally the main problem with consumerism, and how companies use it to put higher profit margins on a product (like $70 games).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luxury_goods
People are defending the cost?Can't say I'm shocked that people from developed countries are defending these prices. It's not like they care about what happens to us, really.
Sega was not... traditional in how they handled business. And it paid off, TecToy took the brunt of the work, translated games to portuguese, handled all the marketing, converted game gear/genesis games to the sms for brazil, even made new games from scratch, and the console really soared. While our market was full of famiclones, sega dominated gaming for two gens (and lasted several more) and with official hardware and software to boot. Shows how much actually caring for a market can do.
Maybe it's giving him too much credit, but he could be putting all the actors (Sony, the local government, etc.) in the same basket. I dunno.
I'd be willing to wager he wouldn't start publicly advocating Sony sell PS5's at a huge loss in Brazil due to the government-imposed tariffs. And I doubt he believes that privately, but who knows.
yes, they sell it official hereDo they sell Xbox officially there? I had to buy my Series X here in Peru through a store that imported it.
Ah, that's nice. My Series X ended up costing about $900 here 😢
We have data from companies who used to manufacture here. Feel free to do some research on that.Well, for that debate we would need to have reliable data on their local costs. We don't, so it's all guesses on our part.
On the other hand, Sony has closed their manufacturing facilities in Brazil. I would hazard a guess that building a new factory here just to assemble PS5s would be a huge investment that they'll need to recoup somewhere, probably on hardware sales, defeating the whole point of actually manufacturing the thing here.
It's possible to sell things at a lossI mean, that's how much the hardware costs to produce + taxes. There's nothing to "slam" here
We have data from companies who used to manufacture here. Feel free to do some research on that.
And, they closed it. Again, their own choice.
Why are you defending them when we're the ones who have to pay so much for an imported console?
Oh 😔Ah, that's nice. My Series X ended up costing about $900 here 😢
"Slams". Really? Do you write for the Washington Post or something?
And pricing has always been an issue, also here in Europe. Sony thinks 499 USD === 499 EUR.
hardware wise no, none of them offer it any cheaper unless producing in brazilian soil (or assembling it, like sony did before)Curious how much the new XBox Series X and Switch is in those regions in comparison to US? Honest question, but does MS adjust prices? Does Nintendo? Or is it a Sony-only thing?
Can you please point out where I said they should reduce the price out of kindness?Yeah, their choice, but neither one of us has numbers to judge if that was a choice made just to screw us over (probably wasn't) or if it was a solid business strategy. I guess Sony likes money, and as soon as having factories here wans't making them enough, they just decided to not have them anymore. Do I like or defend them from closing here? I don't care, really.
Sony closes all its manufacturing facilities - which includes TV, sound gear and everything else - for a reason. I'd say they weren't happy about their profits here and I'm telling you that expecting that they'll, less than a year after the decision to close everything, do a 180 turn and invest in building a new factory to make an extremely scarce top tier product, which they are facing lots of troubles to deliver everywhere, is not really feasible. And that's not defending them, it's just applying reason, they are a multibillion dollar corporation and I assure you that they want to remain as one. Anything beyond that wishful thinking and naiveté.
What I'm trying to do, and failing, is giving you data and context to reflect oversimplifications, some of them made by you. As I said, their pricing on software is egregious, it's absolutely their fault, and could and should be adjusted to our reality. Hardware? Not so much, as I pointed out to you, they sell their hardware here, now, at a bigger loss than they do elsewhere. Do I like it? No. Do I think it could be less out of their kindness? No. Facts are facts and it's juvenile to expect that a company will sell a premium product here at a fraction of what it does outside.
See, you are using alot of classicism and exaggeration with no nuance, to totally ignore the wikipedia link I posted...this is a $500 dedicated console that just came out...so yes that is firmly in the luxury product category...did you even read the link in my last post? Yes, a Kia is not a luxury product for most people and a Ferrari is for most people...What? Unless you also consider computers to be luxury products there's no world where gaming consoles are "luxury" and must be taxed 40 and 50%. These are mass consumer electronics that eventually end up on the shelf next to toasters, but yeah I guess a Nintendo Switch is literally a Patek Phillipe. And not sure what your point is with grey market sports cars lol my point is you'd expect obscene taxes on a fucking Ferrari, a Rolex or a designer product. Yeah I'm aware a gaming console costs slightly more than a microwave, that doesn't make it some bourgeoisie product. I also don't think anyone here is suggesting this is the biggest and most serious problem in the world right now.
Sorry but here has been a lot of posts covering those prices , also blaming MS for the same practices hardware wise (sometimes even worse than Sony).Curious how much the new XBox Series X and Switch is in those regions in comparison to US? Honest question, but does MS adjust prices? Does Nintendo? Or is it a Sony-only thing?
Can you please point out where I said they should reduce the price out of kindness?
That, of course, is a necessity. But it doesn't excuse a better price. And no, I don't fall for the idea that it doesn't maker business sense. If people didn't buy these devices at such a high price, they'd reduce. To be clear, I'm blaming both rich people who pay these prices and the companies who are okay with only letting rich people be their audience.
Also, why do you think they aren't actively lobbying from less taxes?
Where did I mention a boycott? I said rich people are the only ones who can afford a PS5 at its price at the moment. Am I wrong? I also said that, because there are people who buy at the current price, there's no incentive to reduce it. Am I wrong?You didn't said that nor I said you did. What you said was:
To what I have pointed out that they are actually selling their product at a way bigger loss here already, so they are doing what you are saying they should because you "don't fall for the idea that it doesn't make business sense". I won't get into the "rich people buying things drives prices up" because I see no point on it really. Nobody will boycott this and data showing that boycotting hot products drives prices down, or have any effect on long term business practices, are scarce or simply state that, actually, boycotts don't work.
That's a bold claim I would want to see backed by evidence. Do you happen to have any?
Where did I mention a boycott? I said rich people are the only ones who can afford a PS5 at its price at the moment. Am I wrong? I also said that, because there are people who buy at the current price, there's no incentive to reduce it. Am I wrong?
I've been invested in the whole situation about the issues with games for over a decade now. The only victims are customers. Rich people don't care. Governments and companies are both at fault. If you want, you can do some research on how. I don't have the time to do this for you at the moment. But trust me when I say this, as I don't have any reason to lie about something that we'd all benefit from. If companies wanted gaming to be more affordable in Brazil, we'd be there years ago.
As a Brazilian who plays mostly on Sony's platform since the PS1, I've been slowly shifting to PC since the last year and I think it will be hard for me to go back with Sony current direction for our region.
PlayStation Store sales are a joke rn, no PlayStation Now for Brazil too. The recent PS+ 33% increased price.
Around BRL 4500 for a PS5, I've payed less than that for a good laptop which I can use to work, study and play most of recent titles with good performance at 1080p 60fps.
Just to mention a couple of recent releases price comparison between Sony's platform and PC:
Guilty Gear Strive Deluxe Edition on the PS Store: BRL 424 / On Steam: BRL 180
Ninja Gaiden Master Collection on the PS Store: BRL 214 / On Steam: BRL 75
Not to mention that most of PC games digital stores have ACTUAL sales, with actual good discounts and a wide variety of choice for those discounted games.
So yeah, I'm staying away from PlayStation unless things get better at a regional level.
Cory is a cool guy and I agree with him.
If you say so. It's sad, but not surprising, that you're going on that path. It's just disappointing to have Brazilians who go out of their way to defend companies who are not on our side. I guess I should know by now that's the norm. But learning how to not engage with some people about some topics in this forum is a skill I'm still learning, and I think this is one I need to let go of.