• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Oddish1

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,821
In regards to friendship it's more of a case that we should be able to be critical of who peoples are friends with and how they handle their friendships (because holy shit they've all had a long time to talk to Natalie about this in private) and not be told we're trying to destroy people's friendships.
I'm going to go ahead and say that we should absolutely not do that. That is a gross overstep of what we are allowed to do as consumers of their content. We have no business deciding who people should be friends with or the nature of their relationship.

Even going beyond how much of an invasion of their personal lives that is, just think of how exhausting that would be to be monitoring who your fav youtuber's friends are and what they say.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,122
...am I wrong in thinking a simple "damn I see what yall sayin" would've prevented all this? lol

I feel like so much of this "worship" for these youtubers causes them to make the smallest shit huge controversies. I'm not saying it is wrong to look up to whatever "lefttube" creator as someone you deeply admire, but....man...I feel like it just leads to stuff like this. People can't even take a breath before making the dumbest moves possible and letting fame get to their heads.

I'm saying all this on the side of the people critiquing Contra/Lindsey/etc btw. Again, I don't want to say it's wrong to admire youtubers or whatever, but I feel like treating them like some random person would be for the best. Criticize, cool off their content and let them get the message (or not), cause its clear people love to be stubborn
 

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
I'm going to go ahead and say that we should absolutely not do that. That is a gross overstep of what we are allowed to do as consumers of their content. We have no business deciding who people should be friends with or the nature of their relationship.

Even going beyond how much of an invasion of their personal lives that is, just think of how exhausting that would be to be monitoring who your fav youtuber's friends are and what they say.

I'm not entirely sure that I agree. These are public personalities who don't just associate with each other, but signal boost each other. I don't know that there's anything inherently wrong with saying "Your close friend keeps doing things that hurt an entire community of people. Do you believe the same things, or endorse those beliefs?" Especially because nobody went out of their way to "monitor" anyone. Ellis and PT are close friends of Contra's, both have large platforms of their own, and Contra platformed someone horrible. I don't think it's unreasonable to take those pieces of info and then go "I wonder how her friends who are also influential figures on breadtube feel about this."

When PDP brings Ben Shapiro on his show or whatever, I don't think it's a problem to criticize their association, nor do I necessarily feel its wrong to ask his close public friends with large platforms if they are ok being friends with someone who runs in the same circles as neo nazis.



Unsubbing Philosophytube and following this guy.


Jack Saint's channel is great. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdQKvqmHKe_8fv4Rwe7ag9Q
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,122
I'm not entirely sure that I agree. These are public personalities who don't just associate with each other, but signal boost each other. I don't know that there's anything inherently wrong with saying "Your close friend keeps doing things that hurt an entire community of people. Do you believe the same things, or endorse those beliefs?" Especially because nobody went out of their way to "monitor" anyone. Ellis and PT are close friends of Contra's, both have large platforms of their own, and Contra platformed someone horrible. I don't think it's unreasonable to take those pieces of info and then go "I wonder how her friends who are also influential figures on breadtube feel about this."

When PDP brings Ben Shapiro on his show or whatever, I don't think it's a problem to criticize their association, nor do I necessarily feel its wrong to ask his close public friends with large platforms if they are ok being friends with someone who runs in the same circles as neo nazis.
hmm, you changed my mind on this/reminded me that I secretly agree. I most definitely dropped Markilplier, who seems to be a pretty inoffensive guy, because his very vocal PDP stanning was too much for me
 

Icemonk191

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,814
You really see what kind of person someone is when they're faced with criticism. You either take the criticism to heart, admit your mistakes and try to do better in the future or, like what a lot of BreadTube is doing, you circle the wagons, put your fingers in your ears and declared any criticism as harassment.
 

Macil

Member
Apr 2, 2019
11
What exactly is ambiguous about this situation that you felt the need to mention a more 'extreme' situation like white supremacy?
Natalie had someone on in a video where they only provide voice for reading a quote and don't state any of their bad exclusionary views. The person has been known for trans advocacy. Natalie has previous videos where she argues against the bad exclusionary views that happened to be expressed by this person.
I don't think all of that makes it fine and beyond criticism, but all of that makes it a very different situation than one where none of that were true like my hypothetical. (The point of my hypothetical was not "it would be worse if the person attacked black people than nb people", sorry if it came off that way! I thought of the hypothetical by subtracting the specific context and trying to think of an obviously-bad but sadly-common platforming situation, and I see I did that a little awkwardly.)
 
Last edited:

John Dunbar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,229
I admit I am totally clueless about this whole controversy, but even I am a bit bothered about the whole "my next video will explain" bit. If the problem is this Buck character, something Wynn seems to agree with, how on earth could her next video relate to featuring Buck on this one? Has a total "you will be ashamed of your words and deeds" vibe.
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,963
Just saw that Kat Blaque is annoyed because she, too, is being asked to chime in. I can sympathize with that, especially coming from someone who, to the best of my knowledge, is not closely associated with Natalie (unlike Olly, Lindsay and HBomb). I do feel it's unreasonable to expect the whole of Leftube to make a statement.

I just saw this.

I feel bad for Kat, because she's taking a position on this whole thing that is definitely not going to be very popular.
 

bulbasort

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
383
Natalie had someone on in a video where they only provide voice for reading a quote and don't state any of their bad exclusionary views. The person has been known for trans advocacy. Natalie has previous videos where she argues against the bad exclusionary views that happened to be expressed by this person.
I don't think all of that makes it fine and beyond criticism, but all of that makes it a very different situation than one where none of that were true like my hypothetical. (The point of my hypothetical was not "it would be worse if the person attacked black people than nb people", sorry if it came off that way!)
Buck Angel is not known for trans advocacy. Buck Angel is known for being a porn star who outed Lana Wachowski and is hateful towards nonbinary people (and anyone who isn't trans in the exact same way he is).
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,963
Buck Angel is not known for trans advocacy. Buck Angel is known for being a porn star who outed Lana Wachowski and is hateful towards nonbinary people (and anyone who isn't trans in the exact same way he is).
Funny enough, this is the hill Kat Blaque is dying on.
 

Ketkat

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,727
Funny enough, this is the hill Kat Blaque is dying on.

Her point is so strange. She seems to be advocating for patience and understanding of older trans people as they learn about these concepts, while also not diminishing any good they've done in the past.

She is right that Buck Angel is one of the most prominent trans men in popular culture but that was largely as a porn star as I really only saw his name next to Bailey Jay. And I've been in these talks and watched these conversations grow up close for well over a decade. However, it's weird to have this idea that we can't call him out on his bigotry without constantly mentioning any positive activism in the past. Regardless of any good he's done in the past, he does massive amounts of harm and that's really all that matters in this specific situation imo.
 

Deleted member 2426

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,988


Unsubbing Philosophytube and following this guy.


one day he will slip up and you will end up feeling disappointed. The point of all this is not to jump from idol to idol, but to be better at communicating grievances without harassment, and to acknowledge other's pain without second guessing or dismissal.
 

Icemonk191

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,814
one day he will slip up and you will end up feeling disappointed. The point of all this is not to jump from idol to idol, but to be better at communicating grievances without harassment, and to acknowledge other's pain without second guessing or dismissal.
Contrapoints: says a bunch of shitty things about NB people and has a bigot in her video

People: "WTF why would you do these awful things?"

You: "Wow I can't believe you're harassing her like this! Cancel culture strikes again! I am smart."
 

Deleted member 32561

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 11, 2017
3,831
I admit I am totally clueless about this whole controversy, but even I am a bit bothered about the whole "my next video will explain" bit. If the problem is this Buck character, something Wynn seems to agree with, how on earth could her next video relate to featuring Buck on this one? Has a total "you will be ashamed of your words and deeds" vibe.
Natalie has always come across to me as putting artistry first. So it's not shocking, just reinforces the criticism that she doesn't engage with the people she claims she wants to help as well as she should be.
 

25th Baam

Member
Jan 9, 2018
272
Thinking a bit more about the whole controversy, and thanks for all the people that replied to me earlier, I got a lot of things cleared up. Even as a gay guy gender issues were always kinda new to me, so it's good to learn.

Other thing, I was reading the reddit thread about the apologies, and one comment said something like "why natalie would do something that would be seen so clearly as supporting a transmedicalist , while the Transtrender video she putted right before dismantles it?". Is it a bit odd? Or I'm just out of the loop again, and that video wasn't so against transmedicalism as I remember. I fail to see the point she is trying to make, it just sounds weird.
 

Oddish1

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,821
I'm not entirely sure that I agree. These are public personalities who don't just associate with each other, but signal boost each other. I don't know that there's anything inherently wrong with saying "Your close friend keeps doing things that hurt an entire community of people. Do you believe the same things, or endorse those beliefs?" Especially because nobody went out of their way to "monitor" anyone. Ellis and PT are close friends of Contra's, both have large platforms of their own, and Contra platformed someone horrible. I don't think it's unreasonable to take those pieces of info and then go "I wonder how her friends who are also influential figures on breadtube feel about this."

When PDP brings Ben Shapiro on his show or whatever, I don't think it's a problem to criticize their association, nor do I necessarily feel its wrong to ask his close public friends with large platforms if they are ok being friends with someone who runs in the same circles as neo nazis.
That sounds awful. Are we seriously going to start holding Lindsey Ellis accountable for being friends with somebody who put somebody else with troubling views in a video? It's one thing to hold Contra responsible but to then go to her public friends and ask them to share in it seems like a bridge too far. We're essentially policing their friendships with each other and holding them all accountable if one does something we find disagreeable. I saw some comments in this thread saying that nobody is intending to isolate Contra from her friends but even if that's not the intent, that is the results of this line of thinking.

Even asking them because they're all famous "breadtubers" feels too far because none of them are leftube's representative or leader. It's an informal group of youtubers who have similar politics. Y'know, breadtube isn't a formal organization with member cards. So treating them as such and asking that the group answer for one individual isn't fair to anyone.
 

Deleted member 2426

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,988
Contrapoints: says a bunch of shitty things about NB people and has a bigot in her video

People: "WTF why would you do these awful things?"

You: "Wow I can't believe you're harassing her like this! Cancel culture strikes again! I am smart."

I just think this conversation can be had without antagonisms and without making others feel bad, specially because we all are allies.
 

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
That sounds awful. Are we seriously going to start holding Lindsey Ellis accountable for being friends with somebody who put somebody else with troubling views in a video? It's one thing to hold Contra responsible but to then go to her public friends and ask them to share in it seems like a bridge too far. We're essentially policing their friendships with each other and holding them all accountable if one does something we find disagreeable. I saw some comments in this thread saying that nobody is intending to isolate Contra from her friends but even if that's not the intent, that is the results of this line of thinking.

Even asking them because they're all famous "breadtubers" feels too far because none of them are leftube's representative or leader. It's an informal group of youtubers who have similar politics. Y'know, breadtube isn't a formal organization with member cards. So treating them as such and asking that the group answer for one individual isn't fair to anyone.

You just restated the thing you already said, but much more dramatically for some reason, and you didn't even have the decency to address a single one of my points.

I just think this conversation can be had without antagonisms and without making others feel bad, specially because we all are allies.

The bolded is a bad assumption.
 

Oddish1

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,821
You just restated the thing you already said, but much more dramatically for some reason, and you didn't even have the decency to address a single one of my points.
Well, to be honest, the only point you seemed to make was that it's fine to police their friendships because they have a platform. Which I admit I don't have much of a response to other than, like, no that isn't okay.
 

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
Well, to be honest, the only point you seemed to make was that it's fine to police their friendships because they have a platform. Which I admit I don't have much of a response to other than, like, no that isn't okay.

I mean that's not even one of the points I made let alone all of them, but thanks for letting me know you don't want to participate in a discussion before I wasted too much time. Not everyone is that up front about it, and I appreciate it.
 

Landford

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,678
The more I read this thread, the more I believe people are using wathever they can to paint Points in what negative Light that they can.

If people have problems with her videos or views, leave a comment or tweet at her. Dont try to go around to her friends so you could "get " to her.

That is weak as fuck.
 

Oddish1

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,821
I mean that's not even one of the points I made let alone all of them, but thanks for letting me know you don't want to participate in a discussion before I wasted too much time. Not everyone is that up front about it, and I appreciate it.
Thank you. I appreciate you're comments and contributions to the discussion as well. Have a good one.
 

Deleted member 3294

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,973
The more I read this thread, the more I believe people are using wathever they can to paint Points in what negative Light that they can.

If people have problems with her videos or views, leave a comment or tweet at her. Dont try to go around to her friends so you could "get " to her.

That is weak as fuck.
While there definitely bad actors who take advantage of situations like this to harass, you really shouldn't paint people frustrated with Contrapoints with such a broad brush. Trans and genderqueer people are affected by a large personality like Contrapoints, especially one who is trusted by a large amount of people to know her shit about transgender topics, making shitty comments about them and highlighting someone like Buck Angel. There's plenty with good reason to be frustrated with her, and it's shitty to say that cause others used our frustration and pain as an excuse to harass that these criticisms aren't valid. Genderqueer people are not looking to paint her in a negative light, we'd just like her to stop throwing us under the bus.
 

Coiote

Member
Oct 25, 2017
234
I know more about Buck Angel and his views on account of this whole situation(which now involves people whose crime is just being friends with contra) thanon account of a voice over which you need to consult the credits to know who did it, let alone his hateful opinions. I don't feel this backlash is entirely proportionate to the harm caused.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
I know more about Buck Angel and his views on account of this whole situation(which now involves people whose crime is just being friends with contra) thanon account of a voice over which you need to consult the credits to know who did it, let alone his hateful opinions. I don't feel this backlash is entirely proportionate to the harm caused.

Maybe that's because the backlash was just smoldering embers until it was stoked by people going "Nothing to see here!" instead of just acknowledging the criticism and endeavoring to do better in the future. Also, it's not like this situation exists in a vacuum wherein this is the first time Contra has ever done or signed off on something shitty and then buried her head in the sand about it.
 

Landford

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,678
While there definitely bad actors who take advantage of situations like this to harass, you really shouldn't paint people frustrated with Contrapoints with such a broad brush. Trans and genderqueer people are affected by a large personality like Contrapoints, especially one who is trusted by a large amount of people to know her shit about transgender topics, making shitty comments about them and highlighting someone like Buck Angel. There's plenty with good reason to be frustrated with her, and it's shitty to say that cause others used our frustration and pain as an excuse to harass that these criticisms aren't valid. Genderqueer people are not looking to paint her in a negative light, we'd just like her to stop throwing us under the bus.

I have no problem with people shitting on her. While I think the opulence video is one of her best, I also think she didnt do a good job on a few of her last ones. She should be criticized by her content, There is no denying that. Also her views if she says or do something harmful.

What I wont stand is people scrounging together snippets of relevance in their lives by going after someones friend and demanding them to publicly shame and crucify someone that the person wants to hurt.

In normal circunstances, that would already be shitty as hell, but they are going after a trans persons friend. Sometimes all that is keeping them together is their group of loyal friends that support and love them.

Like I said, criticize the contents or the views. Dont ask their friends to cut them off.
 
Jun 22, 2019
3,660

So Theryn, the assistant director of the video essay, posted on the r/ContraPoints about the whole situation, sorry I suck at linking reddit posts :P

In short: "I didn't know he held horrible views."
Why was there such a big time delay to simply say that?

And Contra's "you'll find out in the next video" Kojima-esque 4D chess attempt only continues to befuddle me.
If there was ever a time to be honest and transparent, it was already in the past. The second best time is immediately.
 

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
What I wont stand is people scrounging together snippets of relevance in their lives by going after someones friend and demanding them to publicly shame and crucify someone that the person wants to hurt.

Who are these people you're describing? I keep hearing tell of the lynch mobs demanding PT and Lindsey Ellis and Homberguy rip Contra apart lest they be cancelled, but where are all of these people? Who is demanding any of them cut their friend off?
 

Veelk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,707
Okay, so I've been refraining from making any sort of statement on this situation because I'm a cis man and my opinion shouldn't really amount to much on any trans or nb community policy, so I've just kind of shut up about it.

But I feel I can comment on one general aspect of this situation: I don't think we have a lot of tools for processing problematic viewpoints in people we either support or aren't strictly speaking against.

Because like, a lot of the opposition we face is either trolls or highly damaging, toxic, and just shitty individuals like steven crowder. There's no real conflict to saying "Fuck Steven Crowder" because he's a net negative to the community, pushing alt-right lies and propoganda while persecuting innocent gay people like Carlos Maza.

But then we have situations like this where Natalie Wynn clearly has issues, which are significant to the point that it's legit hurting some people, but is also a major source of good with her videos that communicate a trans perspective and deconstruct alt-right groups and other topics. And the responses I see range from "Okay, she fucked up, but have empathy" where it seems like we're just supposed to forgive her and seemingly give her a carte-blanche until she crosses some line of being truly reprehensible and unforgivable, or "She fucked up bad, and we need SOMETHING from her", be it an apology, a resignation, whatever.

And obviously neither of these are particularly productive, but then what other path do we take here? When one facet of a person is doing active, genuine good and another facet is doing harm, how do we work about preserving the former while fixing the latter? I don't know if we have the linguistic or conceptual tools for that because so much of our energy is spent on assholes that are absolutely reprehensible.

I'm not sure what the fix is, this is just my observation so far.
 

25th Baam

Member
Jan 9, 2018
272
Theryn responded again, clarifying it the post

ayX7W58.png

Ps: someone knows how to make reddit links work?
 

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
Okay, so I've been refraining from making any sort of statement on this situation because I'm a cis man and my opinion shouldn't really amount to much on any trans or nb community policy, so I've just kind of shut up about it.

But I feel I can comment on one general aspect of this situation: I don't think we have a lot of tools for processing problematic viewpoints in people we either support or aren't strictly speaking against.

Because like, a lot of the opposition we face is either trolls or highly damaging, toxic, and just shitty individuals like steven crowder. There's no real conflict to saying "Fuck Steven Crowder" because he's a net negative to the community, pushing alt-right lies and propoganda while persecuting innocent gay people like Carlos Maza.

But then we have situations like this where Natalie Wynn clearly has issues, which are significant to the point that it's legit hurting some people, but is also a major source of good with her videos that communicate a trans perspective and deconstruct alt-right groups and other topics. And the responses I see range from "Okay, she fucked up, but have empathy" where it seems like we're just supposed to forgive her and seemingly give her a carte-blanche until she crosses some line of being truly reprehensible and unforgivable, or "She fucked up bad, and we need SOMETHING from her", be it an apology, a resignation, whatever.

And obviously neither of these are particularly productive, but then what other path do we take here? When one facet of a person is doing active, genuine good and another facet is doing harm, how do we work about preserving the former while fixing the latter? I don't know if we have the linguistic or conceptual tools for that because so much of our energy is spent on assholes that are absolutely reprehensible.

I'm not sure what the fix is, this is just my observation so far.

I don't really see these two things as being mutually exclusive or unproductive. People are hurt and upset, but most acknowledge that she has generally been a force for good which makes the pain worse. People have been pretty patient with her numerous missteps precisely because she isn't some alt-right dingdong. People will continue to criticize her and grow more tired until she either fixes her pattern of bad behavior and re-earns some good will, or people will slowly just unsub from her as this continues to happen.

Either way, I don't think this represents some kind of dramatic new paradigm. Just continue to criticize her in good faith, and if you think she crosses a line from being a net good to a net harm unsub from her and continue to speak out.
 

25th Baam

Member
Jan 9, 2018
272
Lindsay Ellis' tweet on the prev page
Oh I see, but they are not the same person so the point is weird. Plus Lindsay said that regarding the patron post without any inside knowledge of what happened, maybe she meant plan as in a plan to talk about the controversy? Not saying that the whole thing doesnt just smell like a big fuckup though.
 

Madison

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
8,388
Lima, Peru
damn, Natalie realllllly keeps fucking up huh

the whole "watch the next video to find out" shit is fucking gross

everytime this stuff happens I question my subscription more and more

Opulence was ok, this isnt
 
Oct 25, 2017
8,354
Gordita Beach
I'd probably agree more that we shouldn't drag her friends into this shit if they were criticizing her behind the scenes, but I get the vibe that's not really the case. Considering the dumb shit she's said is kinda gross it's kinda fair to question her crew if they're willing to go to bat for her.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,927

So Theryn, the assistant director of the video essay, posted on the r/ContraPoints about the whole situation, sorry I suck at linking reddit posts :P
I don't know if that's me or my outlook on the newer (let's arbitrarily say the last 6 months) content underlying the continued controversy about her personally, or if it is her changing (or being more vocal about certain things) or Theryn's more direct influence on the actual writing and directing of the channel. I don't care for Theryn but I don't want to saddle her with all the small things I am not caring for in new videos, and it could just be a bias that I'm seeing them more now that I'm aware that for a while she's been having a more pronounced and active role in the creation of episodes.

Thanks Theryn!

(does not excuse Natalie at all, btw)
 

25th Baam

Member
Jan 9, 2018
272
In short: "I didn't know he held horrible views."
Why was there such a big time delay to simply say that?

And Contra's "you'll find out in the next video" Kojima-esque 4D chess attempt only continues to befuddle me.
If there was ever a time to be honest and transparent, it was already in the past. The second best time is immediately.
Ehh maybe they took extra care answering to avoid further backlash, or maybe it took them by surprise? Either way Contra position is still very weird, but weird is better than bigoted in my book :P

I'd probably agree more that we shouldn't drag her friends into this shit if they were criticizing her behind the scenes, but I get the vibe that's not really the case. Considering the dumb shit she's said is kinda gross it's kinda fair to question her crew if they're willing to go to bat for her.
The issue is that they were pressuring Natalie's friends to take a stand against her, Theryn is a different thing as she is part of the actual Contra team, but Lindsay and PT for example are just close friends. Plus Theryn herself said that she criticizes Natalie on those points too, just gives her the benefit of doubt because she trusts her.

Thanks Theryn!

(does not excuse Natalie at all, btw)
Yea in the end Nat's silence is not a good look if she expects to explain herself. But I guess that's worth it for her for some reason. I still think she is not going to pull the Kojima-esque excuse and will actually apologize, but that's because I trust her, and it's a very risky move regardless.
 
Last edited:

Syril

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,895
Okay, so I've been refraining from making any sort of statement on this situation because I'm a cis man and my opinion shouldn't really amount to much on any trans or nb community policy, so I've just kind of shut up about it.

But I feel I can comment on one general aspect of this situation: I don't think we have a lot of tools for processing problematic viewpoints in people we either support or aren't strictly speaking against.

Because like, a lot of the opposition we face is either trolls or highly damaging, toxic, and just shitty individuals like steven crowder. There's no real conflict to saying "Fuck Steven Crowder" because he's a net negative to the community, pushing alt-right lies and propoganda while persecuting innocent gay people like Carlos Maza.

But then we have situations like this where Natalie Wynn clearly has issues, which are significant to the point that it's legit hurting some people, but is also a major source of good with her videos that communicate a trans perspective and deconstruct alt-right groups and other topics. And the responses I see range from "Okay, she fucked up, but have empathy" where it seems like we're just supposed to forgive her and seemingly give her a carte-blanche until she crosses some line of being truly reprehensible and unforgivable, or "She fucked up bad, and we need SOMETHING from her", be it an apology, a resignation, whatever.

And obviously neither of these are particularly productive, but then what other path do we take here? When one facet of a person is doing active, genuine good and another facet is doing harm, how do we work about preserving the former while fixing the latter? I don't know if we have the linguistic or conceptual tools for that because so much of our energy is spent on assholes that are absolutely reprehensible.

I'm not sure what the fix is, this is just my observation so far.
I really do want to just acknowledge fuckups and hope she'll get better. I'm not as familiar with Natalie as I am with other creators, but it's harder to just write her off because I know she's not just some alt-right chucklehead who speaks in bad faith arguments.

But, at the same time, and this isn't even about her latest video, I'm trying to figure stuff out about my gender myself, and I've been feeling a lot of impostor syndrome stuff feeling like I'm nb but not experiencing dysphoria or having any strong desire to change my pronouns or present differently, and it really hurts seeing some of the things she's said. It hurts more coming from her because it's something I never thought I'd ever see her say.
 

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
I'm scrolling through the replies to HBbomb's tweet about how this is shitty and he doesn't like being forcibly associated with someone like Buck Angel and so far nobody is telling him that it isn't enough, or that he has to excommunicate his friend, or that he's cancelled, or that he's horrible, or anything else. It's mostly just dozens of people going something like "thank you, this is all we really wanted" with a handful going so far as to say 'Thanks, we never asked for her to be cancelled, we just wanted to be heard.'

So maybe MAYBE the issue here is people who have historically been marginalized feel hurt by someone's pattern of actions, and a mere acknowledgment of their pain and their criticisms is a balm that has soothed a lot of people, and not everyone simply making an issue out of nothing.
 

Icemonk191

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,814
I'm scrolling through the replies to HBbomb's tweet about how this is shitty and he doesn't like being forcibly associated with someone like Buck Angel and so far nobody is telling him that it isn't enough, or that he has to excommunicate his friend, or that he's cancelled, or that he's horrible, or anything else. It's mostly just dozens of people going something like "thank you, this is all we really wanted" with a handful going so far as to say 'Thanks, we never asked for her to be cancelled, we just wanted to be heard.'

So maybe MAYBE the issue here is people who have historically been marginalized feel hurt by someone's pattern of actions, and a mere acknowledgment of their pain and their criticisms is a balm that has soothed a lot of people, and not everyone simply making an issue out of nothing.
Nah. Something something cancel culture something something left eating it's own something something stop making a big deal out of this something something.