• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Deleted member 3294

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,973
This is pretty disingenuous. She doesn't say this in the least. She said she could not find source material for the claim and she already went to lengths trying to find it and going further to find it is looking for a reason to hate someone. Because of that, she doesn't have any proof of how this situation specifically went down or a transcript of what Buck actually said so she's not going to assume what he said in the article.

I still suggest you watch what she says about it to get her take because I probably missed some parts but your description is just outright wrong.
So, even at best she's saying "people who looked into Buck Angel's bullshit more than I did are just looking to find a reason to hate him".

I haven't bothered to watch that much of the video (I'm already informed enough of her bullshit and doesn't sound like this 100 minute video actually adds anything valuable aside from confirming what we already know about Contra) but any way you slice is she's disingenuously describing people who have been critical of her truscum bullshit.
 

Aine

Member
May 27, 2019
1,815
Contra quitting twitter isn't inherently that unpopular of an idea, it's the framing of it that people don't like but I truly hope she never goes back to tweets that aren't purely announcements about content or actually content. If only so we don't have to see Lindsay post about living your truth and your brand ever again.

Oh no you're right, she just said they looked like fascists pretending to be trans, that's so much better

Frankly, I've long been tired of "left" youtube as a whole. Cults of personality built around opportunistic liberals complaining about them uppity minorities.
 

Landford

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,678
Incredbly well made video. The ending punchline of "and no one else" was amazing hahaha
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,254
Frankly, I've long been tired of "left" youtube as a whole. Cults of personality built around opportunistic liberals complaining about them uppity minorities.

that doesn't seem to describe anyone in the left tubes though? (it does seem to describe a certain circle of leftist podcasters though, i'll grant you that)

it is pretty funny seeing content creators get called liberals now as a criticism even though there's been no major shift in their content's brand on that front.
 

jeelybeans

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
that doesn't seem to describe anyone in the left tubes though? (it does seem to describe a certain circle of leftist podcasters though, i'll grant you that)

it is pretty funny seeing content creators get called liberals now as a criticism even though there's been no major shift in their content's brand on that front.

Especially since left tube includes socialists, communists, anarchists, and minorities...
 

Deleted member 58141

user requested account closure
Banned
Jun 23, 2019
400
fixed because this video's part on buck

Even then, she called him out on his usage of the term transsexual and clarified that she disagrees with his attempt in separating himself from us.

She just said she's not comfortable announcing him truscum directly since she couldn't find any record of him openly attacking NB people and she wants to give him the benefit of the doubt for all his trans activism work in a time where being trans was even more difficult than today.

It sounded to me like she's desperate to give him a chance because he was an inspiration to her early in transition, but she still highlighted his problematic behavior and said she disagrees with him... So...
 

jeelybeans

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
User Banned (1 week): Inflammatory Generalizations
Even then, she called him out on his usage of the term transsexual and clarified that she disagrees with his attempt in separating himself from us.

She just said she's not comfortable announcing him truscum directly since she couldn't find any record of him openly attacking NB people and she wants to give him the befit of the doubt for all his trans activism work in a time where being trans was even more difficult than today.

It sounded to me like she's desperate to give him a chance because he was an inspiration to her early in transition, but she still highlighted his problematic behavior and said she disagrees with him... So...

You're giving a lot of context and nuance and that's not what these people want.
 

Landford

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,678
User Banned (1 Week): Inflammatory generalisations.
You're giving a lot of context and nuance and that's not what these people want.
So true. Usually its going as
"She said this obvious bad thing on the video"
"She didnt, in fact, she said the exact opposite"
"I dont care, I'm not watching it."
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
Looks like Contra has been up by over 500 subscribers since I last checked, so I'm gonna go with "yeah fuck this, cancel culture is a fake idea and if she gave a shit about harassment she wouldn't have made this video the way she did"
 

Manu

Member
Oct 27, 2017
17,114
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Looks like Contra has been up by over 500 subscribers since I last checked, so I'm gonna go with "yeah fuck this, cancel culture is a fake idea and if she gave a shit about harassment she wouldn't have made this video the way she did"


Even the Some More News guys who made the "cancel culture isn't real, you snowflakes" video seem to agree with her version of it here.
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
that doesn't seem to describe anyone in the left tubes though? (it does seem to describe a certain circle of leftist podcasters though, i'll grant you that)

it is pretty funny seeing content creators get called liberals now as a criticism even though there's been no major shift in their content's brand on that front.
Which podcasters complain about uppity minorities? I'll be sure to avoid them
 

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
Glad we have another group determined to smear the nonbinary community in a thread about someone the nb community has criticism's of. /s

So like, this is why I've dropped out of online left spaces and only go to read world left spaces (activist meetings, ACLU, BLM gatherings, protests for Dreamers, etc) because the online left (and really, it's a subset of online left on Twitter/Tumblr, etc) will immediately accuse you of "hating all x people" by using the pathology described in the video (Abstraction, etc).

If I accused every white person of being a racist for asking a slightly uncomfortable question or trying to have a discussion, none of these spaces would have any white people left. And we need those white allies.

If those white allies need to be placated at the expense of the minority, then they are unhelpful allies at best.
 

jeelybeans

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
If those white allies need to be placated at the expense of the minority, then they are unhelpful allies at best.

So...to what end? I think where we disagree is that I don't think they are unhelpful allies if they actually show up and help (all of these organizations need all the help they can get). I can say their statements might be *unhelpful* at worst, but usually they aren't intended to hurt, but to learn, vent, or understand. Sometimes it might be an out of line joke out of ignorance (the James Charles examples). I don't even know what you mean by being placated? Because either explaining to them the answer to their question, explaining your experience or positions to them so that they understand, or calling them out for anything they said that's actually inappropriate and seeing how they feel about that, isn't placating them. It's allowing them to grow and learn.

If she's apologized for her tweets and said she has issues with some of the things someone who was on her show has said, and she has a history through her content of educating and promoting the NB community, what else is left? Is continuing to watch her videos "placating" if it educates more people about trans and NB issues? Is accepting she is not going to be on twitter anymore placating? The outrage can be better directed to other places.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623


Even the Some More News guys who made the "cancel culture isn't real, you snowflakes" video seem to agree with her version of it here.


My problem with this is the same thing Kyuuji's said a few times. The term is too vague or too broadly used to mean anything, and the most common usages are well outside of the use case of harassing small trans creators -- remember, the whole "cancelled" slang derives from black social media communities, mainly for dealing with cases of anti-Black racism that straddle the line between casual and structural. We have plenty of words to describe things like "dogpiling" and "harrassment" but people agree that those aren't inherently great things, so it's hard to really argue that an hour of time is worth discussing that.
 

Manu

Member
Oct 27, 2017
17,114
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Just saying that the people who made the video that's been used to say "cancel culture is not really a thing" for months now, even they agree cancel culture DOES exist in this context.

So people saying it doesn't exist shouldn't be automatically dismissed or being accused of being disingenuous/using right rhetoric/whatever.

That's it. That was my whole point.

I've seen a lot of accusations being thrown around at people super lightly.
 

Manu

Member
Oct 27, 2017
17,114
Buenos Aires, Argentina
My problem with this is the same thing Kyuuji's said a few times. The term is too vague or too broadly used to mean anything, and the most common usages are well outside of the use case of harassing small trans creators -- remember, the whole "cancelled" slang derives from black social media communities, mainly for dealing with cases of anti-Black racism that straddle the line between casual and structural. We have plenty of words to describe things like "dogpiling" and "harrassment" but people agree that those aren't inherently great things, so it's hard to really argue that an hour of time is worth discussing that.

That's fair.

Thanks for taking the time to answer.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
32,021
This is ironic and sad to hear, given that Natalie is probably the main reason I'm still alive today as a non-binary person. I spent my whole life struggling with my gender identity in a country where any form of non-normativity is punished by death, and I was in my lowest point when I discovered ContraPoints, which made me rediscover who I am and get a new perspective on life.

The thing is, all of her problematic stuff is things she said on twitter. Her channel, her main platform, has always been 100% pro-nb with 0 ambiguity. As she said in the video, 10% of her videos are about non-binary identity. 'Transtrenders' is the main video I link to people skeptical about nb identities, and it almost always work in changing those people's mind.

Now that she left Twitter for good, all what's left is her channel which is, and has always been, 100% pro-nb. I don't understand how she can be seen as dangerous at all.
As an enby I can only speak for myself but I have never felt invalidated or looked down upon from Contrapoints. If others feel the same, they are more than able to do so, I don't feel the same at all.

But for this video specifically, I think it's the wrong subject matter for her to tackle. She's too close to the subject and her dredging up her own dirty laundry and drama isn't why I'm interested in her work. I understand why she felt it had to the done, but it is alienating to me in that regard.

That being said, I'm only one person and you should watch and make your own opinion for yourself if you haven't already :)
Might not agree with elements of them but appreciate seeing your posts. I was willing to remain eh but supportive until the Buck inclusion, response and the Buck and Ellis blocks here. Perhaps it's having been through a particularly trying festive season but this really felt like two videos that warranted clear separation between them. I found it genuinely hard to take those portions sincerely, though appreciated the breakdown around her own tweets. As you might expect I'd never think harassment is validated for anything she's done, so for me it's always been about discussions here and supporting her directly. Where she's obviously endearing (though, again, the presentation is evidently engineered toward this) and genuinely apologetic it definitely works but as before the Ellis and Buck chunks were just a slog honestly, and felt like it was less about the genuine criticisms levelled and more turning on the bombast again to hype up things again.

So...to what end? I don't even know what you mean by being placated? Because either explaining to them the answer to their question, explaining your experience or positions to them, or calling them out for anything they said that's actually inappropriate and seeing how they feel about that, isn't placating them. It's allowing them to grow and learn.
I appreciate you're almost certainly unaware but these collection of words is practically a meme at this point in this specific case.
 

Deleted member 203

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,899

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
32,021
So just ignore my post and call it a meme...
What's there to say to a post that's been put out almost verbatim for every single thread around her issues and the NB community?

Also a little rich from someone that threw out "these people" and ignored the responses. Could expand exactly on who you meant there.
"These people"? You're doing nothing to quell the divide you act like you're above.
 

jeelybeans

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
What's there to say to a post that's been put out almost verbatim for every single thread around her issues and the NB community?

Also a little rich from someone that threw out "these people" and ignored the responses. Could expand exactly on who you meant there.

Not the best language and I apologize, but these people simply means "the mob" and not any particular community.
 

jeelybeans

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
What 'mob' is there in this thread and why do you feel confident stoking a divide you're wholly apart from?

Genuinely.

Well, it's being argued throughout the thread, and it's described very articulately in the video. But the mob that is not interested in the nuance of any discussion, in flaws everyone has, in how people change and grow over time, in the grays and ambiguity in discussion, in the stupidity of essential-ism, and aren't really positively contributing to "the cause" either in any way. The entire thing feels very self-masturbatory, "punching up" type to me. At the same time I have to acknowledge that there are hurt NB people among the mix and caught in the cross fire too.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
32,021
Well, it's being argued throughout the thread, and it's described very articulately in the video. But the mob that is not interested in the nuance of any discussion and aren't really positively contributing to "the cause" either in any way. The entire thing feels very self-masturbatory, "punching up" type to me. At the same time I have to acknowledge that there are hurt NB people among the mix and caught in the cross fire too.
I think you have to ask why you've placed yourself as an arbiter of who that is and what contributes positively towards 'the cause' (??). Like, non-binary people feel differently about this video, from outright rejection to enjoying it and believing it a good capping off of these topics - with the usual spectrum inbetween. So how are you determining which of us are the mob and which are being positive additions to this nebulous cause?

You're the one applying it to this thread, so don't point to Wynn.
 

Deleted member 60096

User requested account closure
Banned
Sep 20, 2019
1,295
Well, it's being argued throughout the thread, and it's described very articulately in the video. But the mob that is not interested in the nuance of any discussion, in flaws everyone has, in how people change and grow over time, in the grays and ambiguity in discussion, in the stupidity of essential-ism, and aren't really positively contributing to "the cause" either in any way. The entire thing feels very self-masturbatory, "punching up" type to me. At the same time I have to acknowledge that there are hurt NB people among the mix and caught in the cross fire too.
I saw another one doing the same but gonna use this post as an example, can people stop doing the whole "all of the people disagreeing with Contra just don't care about the nuance. "
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
Contra is literally a wealthy entertainer with an enormous platform, and the "canceling" has had no material impact on her.

Exactly. Any analysis of violence that ignores power dynamics between those involved is useless. Usually we don't call this level of ostracism "canceling", and, hell, since the victims of it are usually so obscure, most people don't even realize it's happening in the first place.
 

jeelybeans

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
I think you have to ask why you've placed yourself as an arbiter of who that is and what contributes positively towards 'the cause' (??). Like, non-binary people feel differently about this video, from outright rejection to enjoying it and believing it a good capping off of these topics - with the usual spectrum inbetween. So how are you determining which of us are the mob and which are being positive additions to this nebulous cause?

[1] I'm not the arbiter. But I do work for non profits and am in a lot of activist circles. I don't think people using Contrapoints as a punching bag is helping anyone in the real world nor is it going to make any NB people on twitter feel better about their futures. Especially because she's apologized.
[2] Not all non-binary people feel the same about Contrapoints, about her content, about her tweets, or about the apology, I agree there.
[3] The mob =/= NB people, I don't know where you got that idea. (You are using the language "we"). I am going to assume the majority of the Twitter left that jumped on the hating Contra bandwagon are not even NB.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
32,021
[1] I'm not the arbiter. But I do work for non profits and am in a lot of activist circles. I don't think people using Contrapoints as a punching bag is helping anyone in the real world nor is it going to make any NB people on twitter feel better about their futures. Especially because she's apologized.
[2] Not all non-binary people feel the same about Contrapoints, about her content, about her tweets, or about the apology, I agree there.
[3] The mob =/= NB people, I don't know where you got that idea. (You are using the language "we"). I am going to assume the majority of the Twitter left that jumped on the hating Contra bandwagon are not even NB.
You're the one that applied it to this thread. You keep going back to people harrassing her on Twitter. I'm asking how you're determining which of us in this thread are 'the mob'?
 

Deleted member 60096

User requested account closure
Banned
Sep 20, 2019
1,295
[1] I'm not the arbiter. But I do work for non profits and am in a lot of activist circles. I don't think people using Contrapoints as a punching bag is helping anyone in the real world nor is it going to make any NB people on twitter feel better about their futures. Especially because she's apologized.
[2] Not all non-binary people feel the same about Contrapoints, about her content, about her tweets, or about the apology, I agree there.
[3] The mob =/= NB people, I don't know where you got that idea. (You are using the language "we"). I am going to assume the majority of the Twitter left that jumped on the hating Contra bandwagon are not even NB.
1. She explicitly didn't apologise for most of the controversies, including the Buck Angel one.
3. probably from experience with how bigots talk about marginalised groups? and with the fact enbies have been maliciously tarred under the same brush as the harassers since this whole discourse started?
 
Oct 26, 2017
10,499
UK
If we're going to arbitrate who's allowed to discuss this can we at least cut out all the Natalie fans who defended her in the other threads despite the blatant bigotry? I thought the takeaway from those threads was that people should listen to what the enbie/trans community her had to say?

Contra is literally a wealthy entertainer with an enormous platform, and the "canceling" has had no material impact on her.

100% this. It's kinda sad to see seemingly everybody in her circle brush aside her problematic statements, deny her privilege, and throw those she attacked in with hate-mobs. If you want to bring up the issue with targeted harassment then fine, but stop trying to link it to cancel culture; especially with the absurd Buck should be given another chance/#MeToo aspects of the video.

Also people were talking about how people were attacking her for leaving Twitter. She does this every time and always goes back to Twitter to fuck up again and say the same thing. If she stuck to her guns she's wouldn't be *as* deep in this mess.
 

Tfritz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,254
Also people were talking about how people were attacking her for leaving Twitter. She does this every time and always goes back to Twitter to fuck up again and say the same thing. If she stuck to her guns she's wouldn't be *as* deep in this mess.

the specific criticisms about her leaving twitter were because alt-right shitheads latched onto it as her being bullied off the platform by those awful sjws, and people on this very forum were blaming her for alt-right shithead using the situation to stir shit
 

Deleted member 3294

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,973
Well, it's being argued throughout the thread, and it's described very articulately in the video. But the mob that is not interested in the nuance of any discussion, in flaws everyone has, in how people change and grow over time, in the grays and ambiguity in discussion, in the stupidity of essential-ism, and aren't really positively contributing to "the cause" either in any way. The entire thing feels very self-masturbatory, "punching up" type to me. At the same time I have to acknowledge that there are hurt NB people among the mix and caught in the cross fire too.
I want to give Contrapoints the benefit of the doubt, but at this point she absolutely does not deserve it. The buck angel thing was far from the first time she's said stuff about trans and/or genderqueer people that's questionable at best. Each time she deleted the tweets where she said truscum shit, sometimes maybe apologized (i honestly don't remember if she did), and later would do the same shit. Now she made a 100 minute long video in which she barely apologizes, says some shit about cancel culture, defends herself and spends a long amount of time defending buck angel.

I have zero reason to believe that she will actually grow and change for the better.
 

Deleted member 60096

User requested account closure
Banned
Sep 20, 2019
1,295
sometimes maybe apologized (i honestly don't remember)
This video contains the first proper apologies shes ever given for previous controversies so yeah previously she just let all the cis people forget or never find out it ever happened which indeed doesn't inspire confidence in her ability to not fuck up again
 

mantidor

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,792
Well I just watched it. Yikes, I had no idea about how bad the Buck Angel controversy was, and I really don't know where to start.

I feel she is very much about discussion, arguments, making a point (and a contrapoint to it :P), basically having a discourse, a debate, where people exchange ideas and arguments and challenge them, because the world is not as simple as "people = good/bad". By the tweets she has apologized for I can clearly see twitter as a terrible platform for it, something that she acknowledges, and she should have abandoned it a long time ago. But at the surface it seems twitter is a place of exchange of ideas, and I'm sure initially she enjoyed the "discussions" there, but at the end the place is just terrible for that, and that she likes more youtube as a way of discussion is the sane decision.

basically tl:dr; twitter was a mistake.
 
Oct 26, 2017
10,499
UK
the specific criticisms about her leaving twitter were because alt-right shitheads latched onto it as her being bullied off the platform by those awful sjws, and people on this very forum were blaming her for alt-right shithead using the situation to stir shit

It seemed more like a lot of the posters here siding with the alt-right folks who were claiming she was bullied off of Twitter by those awful SJWs despite many of us pointing out Natalie specifically said that wasn't the case. Though of course that's just on this forum.

How many people were genuinely attacking her for her leaving Twitter being latched onto by the alt-right? The most I remember here was people rightly being sceptical of her actually leaving Twitter.

Though to be honest I think then making your next video about cancel culture does kind of play into the hands of those alt-righters? Like, maybe release an actual apology first for attacking a minority community and defending Buck rather than leaping onto how you were unjustly attacked by leftwing/trans Twitter?
 

Deleted member 21411

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
4,907
Having sat, thought through, and read anything in this thread it's clear to me non-binary folks continue to get shafted on this website by people pretending to be progressive.

My feelings about the video are this.

A) everything that isn't about her seemed pretty accurate, I do agree with usually how mob mentality takes hold. There's so much emotion that at some point it becomes about justifying that emotion more then it has to do with the people or topic at hand.

B) HOWEVER I don't believe that proper apologies don't work, it's just every time shit comes around everyone in the head lights makes the same mistake. Don't run from it, think, actually learn, and above all psa or donate. Public figures can actively help those they hurt but they rarely think this way.

Example I'm making up is pro Jared after we learned he abused his wife. Instead of just calling her a lier, donate to causes that help women who come from these situations. "While I cannot prove my innocence I take this situation very seriously, I will donate to this cause to help to those effected by such things and take a break. " Something along those lines helps the blow.

It's very clear she put herself front and center rather then non binary folks. The fact this thread is so quick to dismiss those people disgusts me, they are lumping different groups together.

C) it was an apology with a million buts in front of it, in my eyes I don't think it was enough. I am not the victim and ultimately I do not view her as a villian but I don't think following the channel is worth my personal time.

Edit: oh I'm also very bothered she left identifiable info when showing some of the tweets. That I can easily see them becoming targets from people watching the video
 
Last edited:

En Avant

Alt account
Banned
Dec 28, 2019
73
I guess I wasn't clear enough with that post, so sorry about that. It would be pretty ridiculous of me to even think about doing that given that Contrapoints and I share the same FFS doc. My own experience with deciding to have FFS is what gave me a lot of my patience with and empathy for her in her discussions of that subject.
I guess I wasn't clear enough with that post, so sorry about that. It would be pretty ridiculous of me to even think about doing that given that Contrapoints and I share the same FFS doc. My own experience with deciding to have FFS is what gave me a lot of my patience with and empathy for her in her discussions of that subject.

If that wasn't your intent then I apologize for misreading your post.

But there's a lot of rhetoric in the Trans community that has become increasingly common the past couple years that is incredibly offensive and invalidating to binary trans people and their lived experiences, as well as a bunch of outright shaming and hostility directed towards Trans people who want to pass and especially towards those who wish or choose to go stealth. It's completely unacceptable and needs to be called out a lot more than it currently is.
 

Icemonk191

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,814
Thank god the Cis folks have shown up to tell us LGBTQ+ folks how we should act and feel about this. What would we ever do without them telling us that blatant bigotry is no big deal and we're wrong.
 

Deleted member 20630

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,406
So she has a rich past full of things NB people in particular have criticized her for.

During her last controversy her close friend essentially defended her choice to not apologize by insinuating her NB critics were a mob who could not be appeased

Which, as an aside, this sure sounds like it comes from the same playbook as posts like this:
You're giving a lot of context and nuance and that's not what these people want.


In the video in this thread Contra muddies the waters by trying to present criticism, particularly NB criticism, as being indistinguishable from harassment. She goes on to dismiss much of the criticism as coming from literal nazis or "fake" trans people.

Am I mistaken, or did Contra also equate NBs and the alt right a few months ago after Opulance came out? Or am I thinking of another Lindsey Ellis tweet from that time defending her?

I know all of the people shouting down hurt NB people and those sympathetic to them really like to talk about nuance, so why don't we all consider the greater context this controversy exists within - A greater context that includes at least half-a-dozen distinct instances where Contra has found herself being criticized for shitty viewpoints prior to this.
 

Deleted member 3294

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,973
Am I mistaken, or did Contra also equate NBs and the alt right a few months ago after Opulance came out? Or am I thinking of another Lindsey Ellis tweet from that time defending her?
Idk if Contra did, but around that time someone made a tweet saying that NB people calling Contra out was "gamergate 2.0" which was liked by Lindsay.
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,648
Frankly, I've long been tired of "left" youtube as a whole. Cults of personality built around opportunistic liberals complaining about them uppity minorities.
What I dislike is all this philosophical stuff but few are advocating or driving people to get out and vote. Use your platform to get people to polling stations!
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
In the video in this thread Contra muddies the waters by trying to present criticism, particularly NB criticism, as being indistinguishable from harassment. She goes on to dismiss much of the criticism as coming from literal nazis or "fake" trans people.

Full agreement here. The most frustrating thing about the 'harassment' montage is that some of the tweets being centered are pretty anodyne, and it's also not obvious to me from what's shown that they're directed at her specifically in the first place. They mention her by name, yes, but aren't actually part of her experience unless she's actively looking for them by way of namesearching or google alerts. Most of the accounts I recognize and have followed or interacted with notably were not directing their criticisms into interactions with her.

So that's the question to me. Why is what they're doing, airing their grievances in public, worse than what Contra has done in her last several videos? How is it worse than what Buck Angel did?