IMO, the cameo is what moved this from questionable but acceptable choice to a potential issue.
Don't get me wrong. What Geoff did for Hideo after the whole Konami mess up was amazing, and his cameo is an obvious thank you to him. No questions that Geoff is an amazing person.
The problem lies with the perception of the Awards. Right now the Game Awards were created because of Geoff wanted the gaming scene to be more recognised as something bigger then VGA's that was laughed at. So as the Game Awards took off and in the essence of perception; Geoff = Game Awards. Regardless if there is a jury that Geoff is not a part of as Geoff is seen as the figurehead and the one in control. If he wants the Game Awards to be seen as fair and just, its a difficult choice.
Now Geoff has been no stranger to being close with the big men. Nintendo, MS and Sony as he was regularly getting exclusives from Reggie along with banter only friends could have but going back to the beginning of what I said, they never put him in as a cameo did they, and that's is the big difference.
In the end tho, the Game Award is only one of hundreds of thousands of journalistic sites who will give their own GOTY awards to whoever they please. Even if Death Stranding wins big, it's not a sprint.
I know Geoff hosts the ceremony, but does he has any ownership/stake whatsoever in the company that organize the award itself? Genuine question here, since he looks way more invested in this for a mere host.
Today we were made aware of the Videogame Awards nominees, and one of the debated about it was regarding if Death Stranding should've been nominated as the Awards' host, Geoff Keighley, makes a small cameo in the game. Keep in mind Geoff is the host but he has no influence whatsoever in the votings.
How do you feel about the game being nominated?
I mean, Disco Elysium has 13 perfect scores and only 3 scores under 8/10 or equivalent out of 51 reviews, and yet somehow didn't make the cut.
Yes, it IS totally fine.Just note that when a woman is involved, we get "ethic in journalism" gamergate. But with this, it's totally fine.
No, I think it's fair.
However, Geoff should be nowhere near the stage anytime Kojima accepts an award.
I mean...that's literally every award show. You think people tune in to the oscars to hear who won for best sound mixing and makeup?Nah. TGA is basically a long commercial for companies. The awards themselves are irrelevant, and if you don't believe me, watch the last one, there were a tons of 'small' categories that got lumped together in a 1 minute section.
My overall point is 'don't take it too seriously' I guess. It was just a dumb cameo in a game.I mean...that's literally every award show. You think people tune in to the oscars to hear who won for best sound mixing and makeup?
Not that you're entirely wrong, it is an entirely commercial event, but your point does next to nothing to prove it.
How if he's not the one that chose it? I'm struggling here. Would it be better for people if he chose it and someone else announced it?Well if Geoff announces Game of the Year (he typically does) and it wins, that's an issue.
Out here really comparing the rise of the alt right to a game getting nominated for an award lmaoJust note that when a woman is involved, we get "ethic in journalism" gamergate. But with this, it's totally fine.
Famitsu is in the jury btw :DThen it'll be like Famitsu's 40/40 and the win will get mocked and devaluated until the end of time.
Out of the 6 nominated game, 3 of which doesn't allow you to shoot humans to death, Death Stranding isn't one of them. :)Yep, there is no problem here at all.
Besides, would be nice if the game that is about reconnecting people instead of shooting them wins.
Well yes of course. And they removed Giant Bomb and EDGE this year, didn't they?
It's not a good look but at the same it's too late to change that perception anyway.....people who are triggered by the public display of support and friendship from GK and Kojima won't take these awards to serious.
Then replace the term with whatever term you feel comfortable with. I got the point across.Can we stop using "triggered" to refer to people disliking the optics of a silly video game/video game awards show? You're still devaluing the term when it's already been devalued by years of misuse.
How is it not disclosed? Millions of players have the game with him in it and the cameo was revealed in September at another show Geoff hostedAgree to disagree.
I think is good people question the validity of the awards for a potential conflict of interest.
I don't think Death Stranding being a GOTY has anything to do with Geoff, but I think it should be at the very minimum disclosed he was in it as a cameo. He is a producer of the show after all.
Seriously, this.
Then replace the term with whatever term you feel comfortable with. I got the point across.
How is it not disclosed? Millions of players have the game with him in it
You're naive to think that the most promoted and watched award event in the industry has no monetary or financial consequences.if it was a real award show my answer might be different but this is a commercial so who cares.
It's Geoff's show, he makes the rulebook. People getting up in arms about "conflict of interest" is silly... even if Geoff had a pro-Kojima influence on the outcome, it's not that serious folks. If you personally think the optics look bad and undermine the integrity of the awards, that's fine... nobody should be taking the awards that seriously anyway.
Frankly, the people complaining about this mostly just come off as being salty that Bad Game Death Stranding got nominated for GOTY when [Insert Other Game Here] got snubbed.
?You're naive to think that the most promoted and watched award event in the industry has no monetary or financial consequences.
Did you also question potintial conflict of interest when VGA was getting bankrolled by the same companies that have games nominated, like... Pretty much every year? It's a commercial event made to make money, that's why the body organizing the event isn't involved in picking nominations or voting for winner, what's the difference between Geoff being in Death Stranding or Geoff show being openly bankrolled by Sony, Nintendo, Activation, etc... When they have games nominated every year?Agree to disagree.
I think is good people question the validity of the awards for a potential conflict of interest.
I don't think Death Stranding being a GOTY has anything to do with Geoff, but I think it should be at the very minimum disclosed he was in it as a cameo. He is a producer of the show after all.
What's a real "award show"? When all the biggest most well known and prestigious ones for movies, music and TV shows are all produced the same way?! This is how pretty much all big awards shows are made, commercial for profit events!if it was a real award show my answer might be different but this is a commercial so who cares.
You're naive to think that the most promoted and watched award event in the industry has no monetary or financial consequences.
In 2015, during the #fuckKonami he got emotional just because Kojima couldn't receiv the award, and called that "a tragedy".
Meanwhile there was a game about the real story of the death of the programmer's son.
But, you know, THE TRAGEDY was Kojima butthurt ego.
Let's be real here, there will be a ton of toxicity from both sides even if DS doesn't win.At this point I'd want Death Stranding to lose if only because it would help prevent hundreds of toxic posts and the ensuing shitstorms that would come with a win. We've already seen people's intelligence be insulted, accusations of fanboyism (and console fanboyism) and usages of terminology associated with the alt-right's smearing of 'SJWs' and the game has only just been nominated. It's ridiculous.