A 1070Ti isn't meaty, it's 2020 and the game will be on next-gen hardware too.
970 is like 6 years old. I doubt that is next gen territoryBlooming eck, GTX 970 as the recommended minimum!? Aye, safe to say we're in next gen territory now @.@
Dude, everything below 20XX is a generation of GPUs behind and the 30XX cards will come soon.When a game pushes the specs beyond a 1060 as recommended I would consider that meaty and as I said this is before ray tracing.
970 is still recommended for most games. Or a 1060 which is not much better. Microsoft Flight Sim recommended is a 970. It being minimum is absolutely a big shift, I wouldn't be surprised if this is the first time it has ever been the minimum spec period.
The Medium lists the GTX 1060 for the minimum GPU, for "1080p Low details".970 is still recommended for most games. Or a 1060 which is not much better. Microsoft Flight Sim recommended is a 970. It being minimum is absolutely a big shift, I wouldn't be surprised if this is the first time it has ever been the minimum spec period.
The Medium lists the GTX 1060 for the minimum GPU, for "1080p Low details".
That's the winner so far.
GPU jumps take longer and are smaller than ever. Despite being 6 years old the current top card (2080Ti) is only 3.5-4x faster than a 970, meaning that if a 970 is actually minimum then all hardware is going to struggle at 4K.
Again the same kind of logic applies to what I said above here. Most Turing cards aren't that much faster than a 1060, especially when you apply the resolution factor.Six year old GPUs for the minimum, no need to panic.
Games are appearing that confirm our PCs can no longer sleepwalk through ports anymore. Sink or swim time is upon those who rode out the PS4 generation with Maxwell/GCN GPUs.
The Medium lists the GTX 1060 for the minimum GPU, for "1080p Low details".
That's the winner so far.
Rather than the recommended being meaty it's the minimum requirements that are pretty extreme. But minimum can mean all sorts of things.
GPU jumps take longer and are smaller than ever. Despite being 6 years old the current top card (2080Ti) is only 3.5-4x faster than a 970, meaning that if a 970 is actually minimum then all hardware is going to struggle at 4K.
Again the same kind of logic applies to what I said above here. Most Turing cards aren't that much faster than a 1060, especially when you apply the resolution factor.
I often have the feeling people overestimate the difference between newer & older cards. Like if the 1060 is truly minimum low at 1080p then there is no card that can do 4K atm because the 2080Ti is only 3x faster and that's not enough. You can't drop settings either as the 1060 is already at low.
That said if that were really the case then the XSX shouldn't be able to hit native 4K 30fps with a 2080 tier GPU unless we get another HZD tier port. I'll just guess that the minimum settings are somewhat overstated or they're referring to 60fps on PC.
When a game pushes the specs beyond a 1060 as recommended I would consider that meaty and as I said this is before ray tracing.
A 1070Ti isn't meaty, it's 2020 and the game will be on next-gen hardware too.
It will have dirt tracingDoes Dirt 5 support ray tracing? if it does, hopefully theres dlss support
Correct.
Yeah there's only 20% difference between a 970 & 6gb 1060.
Simply by age and performance. A 1070Ti is a good card, but far from "meaty". I expect recommended specs in games that'll release on next-gen hardware to target high-end hardware.
CPU load is independent from resolution.Holy crap this game must be CPU intensive. I hope that's just for 4K resolution. I have a R7 1700X and a 2070 Super, and my aim is to play upcoming games at or above PS5/XSX benchmarks in 1080p.
(I also have a NVMe SSD to meet recommended SSD specs).
Holy crap this game must be CPU intensive. I hope that's just for 4K resolution. I have a R7 1700X and a 2070 Super, and my aim is to play upcoming games at or above PS5/XSX benchmarks in 1080p.
(I also have a NVMe SSD to meet recommended SSD specs).
Simply by age and performance. A 1070Ti is a good card, but far from "meaty". I expect recommended specs in games that'll release on next-gen hardware to target high-end hardware.
It might be worth upgrading to a 3600 or 3700X assuming you can do so without changing your motherboard.
That makes sense. The 5700 XT next to the 1070 Ti was strange.Lol. They changed the recommended:
AMD Vega 64---->5700XT
Ryzen 5 2600X--->3600X
Lol. They changed the recommended:
AMD Vega 64---->5700XT
Ryzen 5 2600X--->3600X
Yeah, 5700XT being recommended alongside 1070Ti looks like someone's mistake really.Don't understand the recommended GPUs.
Why a 5700 XT if the one from Nvidia is "only" a 1070 Ti?
What about Vega 64, 5600 XT, 5700?
2060 isn't "meaty" by any metric, mostly because it's a $300 GPU right now which will be upgraded to a cheaper 30 series one in three months or so.A 1070Ti isnt considered meaty in 2020?
That thing has RTX 2060 just shy of 1080 levels of performance...if you are telling me the RTX 2060 isnt meaty you reall need to get out of your bubble.