That they revise the ridged chin as this vein-y dental indentation just so perfectly encapsulates how Fox kept screwing this up. The shame in the weirdness of the original comic designs, the need to fix and recontextualize it so that it "makes sense" and "looks realistic", all of it. And yet here comes Captain Marvel giving us green dudes with pointy ears and ridged chins, toned down a bit from the comics but still properly representing them, and it's worked wonders.
It's hilarious, because it shows a basic misunderstanding of the source material. "It looks silly." Motherfucker, they're super hero comic books, that's the point.
We had an accurate Carlie-27 on screenNonsense.
If there is something the MCU showed us, is that colorful costumes accurate to the source can be properly translated to movies.
Heck, look at MCU's Skrulls, they look like the comic counterparts.
Not everything has to be black leather and loose similarities like these plant-like Skrulls.
Further proof that taking away X-Men from Fox was the best thing that could've happened. Anyone who prefers this obviously doesn't read comics and probably think Maguire was the best Spider-Man.
They were making comic book movies, but comic books were BANNED FROM THE SET.
The flying heck is this bullcrap?!"Bryan Singer had this thing that people would think he really wanted to take comic book characters seriously, as real three-dimensional characters, that people who don't understand these comics might think they're two-dimensional, so no one was allowed [comics]..."
It helps that the movie had a reasonable explanation for the big head and big eyes. Same thing for Mysterio. Two of the most outlandish looking comic villains have good reasons for their designs.I think Warner has learned the lesson and it is embracing the goofy. Look at Aquaman's Black Manta.
Remember it next time anybody says the X-Men movies were good. They were literally terrible on purpose.
Did they just watch M. Night Shyamalan's Signs and say "copy + paste"?
They were good to me, but that's just me.Remember it next time anybody says the X-Men movies were good. They were literally terrible on purpose.
Pigs roll around in mud. Find happiness where ever you can, I guess.
You give me good writing I'll forgive changes.Pigs roll around in mud. Find happiness where ever you can, I guess.
And fox quiksilver was better in every way than the MCU version and a highlight of DOFP.YES! I was so happy the worker bee Skrulls were in it.
You might have forgotten what happened with Age of Ultron/Days of Futures Past.
Marvel reveals they're using Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver in Age of Ultron. As those are shared characters between the two companies, Fox quickly changes an elaborate scene where Juggernaut breaks Magneto out of prison to the Quicksilver scene in DoFP just to beat Marvel to using the character on-screen.
And fox quiksilver was better in every way than the MCU version and a highlight of DOFP.
And starlord isnt starlord. Who cares.Except one was actually Quicksilver. I won't argue that the character in Days of Future Past wasn't cooler, because he was, but he's not Quicksilver. I recognize that almost everyone doesn't give a shit.
they also look bad for completely different reasonsFor comparison, Skrulls in Captain Marvel
I prefer MCU Skrulls tbh.
MCU Skrulls are meant to be sympathetic and relatable, which is important because of how they are implemented in the plot. These concept Skrulls are monstrous, inhuman, and devoid of emotion or recognizable facial features, which suggests they were only meant to be disposable cannon fodder, which is a huge waste.